To: Dajjal
Kind of funny when “We the People” have no standing to demand that a candidate for the President of the United States actually meets the constitutional requirements to do so.
3 posted on
10/25/2008 1:54:56 AM PDT by
DB
To: DB
Way back when...
It is a State’s issue. It is up to the SOS to vet candidates that appear on the ballot(s).
46 posted on
10/25/2008 3:39:33 AM PDT by
EBH
( Welcome to the United Socialist States of America. Oct. 1, 2008)
To: DB
88 posted on
10/25/2008 6:12:34 AM PDT by
tutstar
(Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
To: DB
Kind of funny when “We the People” have no standing to demand that a candidate for the President of the United States actually meets the constitutional requirements to do so.Not funny haha....but smashing your funny bone funny.
183 posted on
10/25/2008 8:53:56 AM PDT by
NoGrayZone
(Michelle Obama...Queen of the Damned (courtesy of CougarGA7)
To: DB
That expresses my thoughts on it too. Since when do we not have a right to make sure a candidate is qualified to be president? I guess this judge is not only consulting European norms but mid evil ones at that, since he thinks we’re ignorant serfs.
206 posted on
10/25/2008 9:27:56 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Is Obamanation what our founding fathers, our fallen men in combat, and Ronald Reagan had in mind?)
To: DB
Get ready for it, I’m already screwed.
272 posted on
10/25/2008 11:12:00 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(Quiet by nature, standing tall)
To: DB
This judge knows that if he shuts down Obama’s campaign at this point in the game, he’s going to wind up like a lot of former Klinton operatives: in a lonely country road ditch, dead in a one-car “accident”. They’re not above putting a bag of cocaine in the jockey box and some kiddie porn in the trunk to really screw his legacy. I’m scared to imagine what the psycho pro-Obamans are capable of.
284 posted on
10/25/2008 12:03:09 PM PDT by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(Never argue with idiots. They'll pull you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: DB
Kind of funny when “We the People” have no standing to demand that a candidate for the President of the United States actually meets the constitutional requirements to do so."
The Constitution is too limit the government and only the government has standing to enforce the Constitution.
What would our Founders say and do to change this?
292 posted on
10/25/2008 12:44:15 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(As insane as McCain is , my principles can't allow someone like Huessein to be president.)
To: DB
I wonder WHO does have standing in this case? If the voters and citizens don’t who does? Maybe Elisabeth II?
318 posted on
10/25/2008 3:47:42 PM PDT by
April Lexington
(I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson