Posted on 10/24/2008 12:00:01 PM PDT by RetiredArmy
Im for the guy who can tell the lion from the lamb.
Contrarian that I am, Im voting for John McCain. Im not talking about bucking the polls or the media consensus that its over before its over. Im talking about bucking the rush of wet-fingered conservatives leaping to Barack Obama before theyre left out in the cold without a single state dinner for the next four years.
I stand athwart the rush of conservative ship-jumpers of every stripe neo (Ken Adelman), moderate (Colin Powell), genetic/ironic (Christopher Buckley) and socialist/atheist (Christopher Hitchens) yelling Stop! I shall have no part of this motley crew. I will go down with the McCain ship. Id rather lose an election than lose my bearings.
First, Ill have no truck with the phony case ginned up to rationalize voting for the most liberal and inexperienced presidential nominee in living memory. The erratic temperament issue, for example. As if McCains risky and unsuccessful but in no way irrational attempt to tactically maneuver his way through the economic tsunami that came crashing down a month ago renders unfit for office a man who demonstrated the most admirable equanimity and courage in the face of unimaginable pressures as a prisoner of war, and who later steadily navigated innumerable challenges and setbacks, not the least of which was the collapse of his campaign just a year ago.
McCain the erratic is a cheap Obama talking point. The 40-year record testifies to McCain the stalwart.
Nor will I countenance the dirty campaign pretense. The double standard here is stunning. Obama ran a scurrilous Spanish-language ad falsely associating McCain with anti-Hispanic slurs. Another ad falsely claimed McCain supports cutting Social Security benefits in half. And for months Democrats insisted that McCain sought 100 years of war in Iraq.
McCains critics are offended that he raised the issue of William Ayers. Whats astonishing is that Obama was himself not offended by William Ayers.
Moreover, the most remarkable of all tactical choices of this election season is the attack that never was. Out of extreme (and unnecessary) conscientiousness, McCain refused to raise the legitimate issue of Obamas most egregious association with the race-baiting Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Dirty campaigning, indeed.
The case for McCain is straightforward. The financial crisis has made us forget, or just blindly deny, how dangerous the world out there is. We have a generations-long struggle with Islamic jihadism. An apocalyptic, soon-to-be-nuclear Iran. A nuclear-armed Pakistan in danger of fragmentation. A rising Russia pushing the limits of revanchism. Plus the sure-to-come Falklands-like surprise popping out of nowhere.
Who do you want answering that phone at 3 a.m.? A man whos been cramming on these issues for the last year, whos never had to make an executive decision affecting so much as a city, let alone the world? A foreign-policy novice instinctively inclined to the flabbiest, most vaporous multilateralism (e.g., the Berlin Wall came down because of a world that stands as one), and who refers to the most deliberate act of war since Pearl Harbor as the tragedy of 9/11, a term more appropriate for a bus accident?
Or do you want a man who is the most prepared, most knowledgeable, most serious foreign-policy thinker in the United States Senate? A man who not only has the best instincts, but has the honor and the courage to, yes, put country first, as when he carried the lonely fight for the surge that turned Iraq from catastrophic defeat into achievable strategic victory?
Theres just no comparison. Obamas own running mate warned this week that Obamas youth and inexperience will invite a crisis indeed a crisis generated precisely to test him. Can you be serious about national security and vote on November 4 to invite that test?
And how will he pass it? Well, how has he fared on the only two significant foreign policy tests he has faced since hes been in the Senate? The first was the surge. Obama failed spectacularly. He not only opposed it. He tried to denigrate it, stop it, and finally deny its success.
The second test was Georgia, to which Obama responded instinctively with evenhanded moral equivalence, urging restraint on both sides. McCain did not have to consult his advisers to instantly identify the aggressor.
Todays economic crisis, like every other in our history, will in time pass. But the barbarians will still be at the gates. Whom do you want on the parapet? Im for the guy who can tell the lion from the lamb.
Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist.
Racial violence is just bull. I do live in SoCal wherein a lot of black people and some of them does not even like Hussein. It’s those liberal white people are supporting BO plus I do have a legal CA 6.8 MM just in case.
Good article.
Most excellent commentary.
I'm guessing that you'll find that abortion is the issue on which they all base their complaints about McCain-Palin.
BTTT!
This is one of Krauthammer’s best articles.
excellent Krauthammer.
Ole Charles needs to stop the hit pieces on Palin now.
>> Contrarian that I am, Im voting for John McCain.
LOL, contrasting the rhetoric with the vote. But of course, the vote will not be printed or televised.
CK still has my left ear.
After trashing McCain's debate performances on FOX I admit trashing you a bit in this forum. It seemed that your cerebral analysis of every belch and blurp was hurting the effort. But, now that you've written this fine piece, I'm willing to forgive and forget. Sure could have used these kind words on debate night.
Brilliant as usual. Welcome back!
I'm talking about bucking the rush of wet-fingered conservatives leaping to Barack Obama before they're left out in the cold without a single state dinner for the next four years. I stand athwart the rush of conservative ship-jumpers of every stripe â neo (Ken Adelman), moderate (Colin Powell), genetic/ironic (Christopher Buckley) and socialist/atheist (Christopher Hitchens) -- yelling "Stop!" ...I will go down with the McCain ship. I'd rather lose an election than lose my bearings.I won't -- I'll be happy to win an election with McCain-Palin, and congressional hearings regarding the ridiculous partisan media shills. :')
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.