Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: We ‘Botched’ Sarah Palin's Interview
Newsmax ^ | October 24, 2008 | David A. Patten

Posted on 10/24/2008 11:23:24 AM PDT by kddid

Stop the presses — CNN is taking responsibility for falsely stating that National Review magazine called Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin “incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt or all of the above.”

“I think ideology has now overridden any kind of journalistic ethics at all,” Fox News host Bill O’Reilly told his audience when he learned of the distortion. “And I think that’s the bottom line here.”

An interview with Palin that aired Tuesday on CNN’s The Situation Room touched off the controversy. CNN correspondent Drew Griffin twisted the meaning of a National Review column during a question he posed to Palin about whether her message is reaching the public.

Griffin’s question: “Governor you’ve been mocked in the press. The press had been pretty hard on you, Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you. The National Review had a story saying, ‘I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt or all of the above.’”

Palin immediately asked, “Who wrote that?”

Griffin stammered, “T-that was in The National Review. I don’t know who wrote that.”

“Who wrote it?” Palin replied, obviously concerned. “I’d like to talk to that person.”

On Thursday, Griffin appeared on two CNN programs, "Newsroom" and "Situation Room," to confess the error.

Said Griffin, “I never really explained the point of the National Review before she finished answering the question. “In no way did I intend to misquote The National Review.”

Griffin also said, “Unfortunately, my question — I botched it.”

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: drewgriffin; griffin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: kddid
And here is Drew Griffin's report on Obama/Ayers And you can see at the end Anderson Cooper tries to dismiss Drew Griffin's report. So the guy is already getting a lot of crap over at CNN, so I say cut him a break this time.
41 posted on 10/24/2008 11:34:40 AM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid
“In no way did I intend to misquote The National Review.”

Sure and I have a bridge for sale !

42 posted on 10/24/2008 11:34:40 AM PDT by Timocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Cases like this remind me of what Goldberg wrote about in his book “Bias”. Most of the MSM’s bias is, I suspect, just what happened here. They truly are “mistakes”, but “mistakes” of blind eagerness to destroy anyone on the right of the political spectrum.

That is, these people are so eager to be the next Woodward and Bernstein that they actually (and honestly) miss key portions of facts and stories. They can then honestly say later, if even caught, that they did make a mistake and had no malice with respect to the mistake.

Which is true. What they don’t admit (to themselves much less others) is that their eagerness to bring such people down MAKES them commit those “honest mistakes”.


43 posted on 10/24/2008 11:35:09 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid
Griffin stammered

Most bullies turn into a quivering mass of goo when a would-be victim fights back.

44 posted on 10/24/2008 11:35:34 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

My bad...

45 posted on 10/24/2008 11:35:52 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

So sorry...

46 posted on 10/24/2008 11:36:34 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

His lead-in, that she’s been attacked by conservtives as well, belies his phony non-apology that “I never really explained the point of the NR before she finished answering the question.”


47 posted on 10/24/2008 11:37:05 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kddid
“I think ideology has now overridden any kind of journalistic ethics at all,” Fox News host Bill O’Reilly

Where the hell have you been BO??? It has been this way for 25 years.

48 posted on 10/24/2008 11:37:05 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (The TIME for revolution to take back this Republic nears!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid
when Democrats and the press tore into Dan Quayle.

"and"??? Pointlessly redundant.

Owl_Eagle

There are people who are surrounded by bigots
and know it is wrong, but are afraid to be vocal against it.
These people are going to pull the lever for Obama
and they are not being polled.
angee_is_mad, DUmmy

49 posted on 10/24/2008 11:37:24 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Damage already done. Front page headline followed 4 days later by a retraction on the bottom of page B8. It is an old Media trick. It is right up there with “my opponent is not a wife beater and I have never called him a wife beater nor has anybody on my staff every called my opponent a wife beater” routine.

The late and unlamented Julia Carson (D) actually used that against her last opponent, a very successful Black businessman, four years ago. Mr. Dickerson had one domestic disturbance charge filed against him by his ex-wife. She even came out and said she had never brought charges against him, she just called the police once when they were going through their divorce. The DNC sent a 4 color mailer to everybody in the District actually calling him a wife beater. Julia of course claimed she had nothing to do with it.


50 posted on 10/24/2008 11:37:26 AM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Accident...

51 posted on 10/24/2008 11:37:30 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Where’s the correction on the clothes’ story? How long do we wait for the retraction of the “Kill Him” story, the apology from 0bama for continuing the lie in the debate, from all the other reporters for aiding and abetting??


52 posted on 10/24/2008 11:38:33 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

They’re sorry they botched this one, and hoping they can come up with something else to throw at her.


53 posted on 10/24/2008 11:38:34 AM PDT by popdonnelly (An Obama Administration isn't Camelot, it's Doctor Zhivago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Simple error...

54 posted on 10/24/2008 11:38:39 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Well, I’ll be dog! A Steve Taylor fan!!!

One of the greatest Christian songwriters (and fairly prophetic at that) of the 70’s and 80’s.

I didn’t know there were any more out there... About the race right now,

Life unwinds like a cheap sweater,
But since I gave up hope, I feel a lot better,
And the truth gets blurred like a wet letter,
But since I gave up hope, I feel a lot better.

and the second chorus:

While the world winds down to a final prayer,
Nothing soothes quicker than complete despair,
I predict by dinner I won’t even care,
Since I gave up hope, I feel a lot better.

The rest of the song applies to, but it’s a bit harder to parse...

Good quote.


55 posted on 10/24/2008 11:39:32 AM PDT by Gordon Greene (www.fracturedrepublic.com - Me... I'm ignorant but I do know this; God is our only hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kddid
Said Griffin, “I never really explained the point of the National Review before she finished answering the question. “In no way did I intend to misquote The National Review.”

In the above Griffin tries to pass off some of the blame for the error onto Gov. Palin. What a load of unadulterated BS. Griffin's bias generated the error. He didn't real the National Review Article close enough to realize what was written there; rather, he read what he, himself, thinks is the case. The fact that he tried to use that quote, at all, demonstrates his vacuous integrity. You're unmasked, Griffin ... you're a liberal hack. Live with it.
56 posted on 10/24/2008 11:39:47 AM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Sun was in my eyes...

57 posted on 10/24/2008 11:40:15 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid
Palin immediately asked, “Who wrote that?” Griffin stammered, “T-that was in The National Review. I don’t know who wrote that.”

Drive by journalism right there! Quotes from an article, and doesn't even bother to check who he was quoting.

58 posted on 10/24/2008 11:40:15 AM PDT by tapatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
“Nationalist” media?

Nationalist implies pro-American.

CNN is internationalist, as in internationalist socialist communism.

59 posted on 10/24/2008 11:41:25 AM PDT by allmendream (White Dog Democrat: A Democrat who will not vote for 0bama because he's black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Barb4Bush

Oops. Thanks for the correction. The ol’ brain doesn’t work as well as it used to. :-)


60 posted on 10/24/2008 11:41:59 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson