Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opposition To California Prop. 8: Hate In The Name Of Love (The New Ten Minute Hate Campaign Alert)
Townhall.com ^ | 10/21/2008 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 10/20/2008 9:22:11 PM PDT by goldstategop

Next to the presidential election, California Proposition 8 is the most important vote in America.

It will determine the definition of marriage for the largest state in America, and it will determine whether judges or society will decide on social-moral issues.

In 2000, 61 percent of the voters in California, one the most liberal states in America, voted to retain the only definition of marriage civilization has ever had -- the union of a man and woman (the number of spouses allowed has changed over time but never the sexes of the spouses). But in May 2008, four out of seven California justices decided that they would use their power to make a new definition: Gender will now be irrelevant to marriage.

As a result of this judicial act, the only way to ensure that we continue to define marriage the way every religious and secular society in recorded history has defined marriage -- as between men and women -- is to amend the California Constitution. It is the only way to prevent the vote of one judge from redefining marriage, as was also done in Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Which is why Proposition 8 exists.

But even though California voters decided by a large margin to retain the man-woman definition of marriage, passing Proposition 8 will be a challenge.

First, the attorney general of California, Jerry Brown, unilaterally renamed the proposition as it appears on California ballots. It had been listed as "Amends the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Brown, a liberal Democrat, changed the proposition's wording to: "Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry. Initiative Constitutional Amendment."

The reason for this change is obvious -- to make the proposition appear as a denial of a basic human and civil right.

Marriage has never been regarded as a universal human or civil right. Loving and living with anyone one wants to live with are basic human rights. But marriage is actually a privilege that society bestows on whom it chooses. And even those who believe that any two unmarried people who want to get married should be given a marriage license should regard as wrong an attorney general changing a ballot proposition's language to favor his own social views. What Brown did was attempt to manipulate people who lean toward preserving the definition of the most important social institution in society -- people who have no desire whatsoever to hurt gays -- to now think of themselves as bigots.

According to Sacramento Bee columnist Margaret A. Bengs, "a recent Field Poll analysis found" that the new wording by Brown "had a 'striking' impact on those newly familiar with the measure, with a 23-point swing against it."

What we have here is truly manipulative. Four justices create a right, and then a sympathetic attorney general renames a proposition so as to protect a 4-month-old right that no one had ever voted to create.

And the Left accuses the Right of imposing its values on society.

The second hurdle for Proposition 8 is even greater: the multimillion dollar campaign to label proponents of Proposition 8 "haters" and to label the man-woman definition of marriage as "hate." Or as they put it: "Prop 8 = Prop Hate."

It is apparently inconceivable to many of those who wish to change the definition of marriage that a decent person can want to retain the man-woman definition. From newspaper editorials to gay and other activist groups, the theme is universal -- proponents of traditional marriage are haters, the moral equivalents of those who opposed racial equality. As The New York Times editorial on the subject put it, Proposition 8 is "mean-spirited."

But it is the charge of hate (along with bigotry, homophobia and intolerance) that is the primary charge leveled against supporters of Proposition 8. That's why one major anti-Proposition 8 group is "Californians Against Hate."

Any honest outsider would see that virtually all the hate expressed concerning Proposition 8 comes from opponents of the proposition. While there are a few sick individuals who hate gay people, I have neither seen nor heard any hatred of gays expressed by proponents of Proposition 8. Not in my private life, not in my e-mail, not from callers on my radio show.

It is the proponents of same-sex marriage who express nearly all the hate -- because in fact many of them do hate, loudly and continuously. But hate in the name of love has a long pedigree. Why should our generation be different?

These charges of "hate" against proponents of retaining the man-woman definition of marriage do not speak well for those who make them. I, for one, find it easy to believe that most opponents and most proponents of Proposition 8 are decent people. There are millions of decent people who think marriage should be redefined. I think they are wrong, but I do not question their decency.

Why won't those who favor redefining marriage accord the same respect to the millions of us who want gays to be allowed to love whom they want, live with whom they want, be given the rights they deserve along with the dignity they deserve, but who still want marriage to remain man-woman?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 1984; 2008election; caglbt; california; conservatism; dennisprager; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; judeochristian; judicialactivism; left; moralabsolutes; moralrelativism; orwellianism; prager; prop8; proposition8; protectmarriage; queerlybeloved; samesexmarriage; tenminutehate; townhall; traditionalmarriage; traditionalvalues
Straight out of 1984, the Left's latest 10 minute hate campaign is directed against those who cherish traditional marriage. If you want to protect it in the state's highest law, you're a homophobe bigot. As far the Left is concerned, that ends all discussion about marriage since one does not by definition, debate with bigots. This is what those of us who want to keep a few people from redefining the meaning of marriage for the rest of society face in California.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

1 posted on 10/20/2008 9:22:11 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Minorities in ca typically vote liberal except for issues like gay marriage where they will likely overwhelmingly vote for 8. Prop 8 will win easily.


2 posted on 10/20/2008 9:25:55 PM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

Only to voted on again in another six months.


3 posted on 10/20/2008 9:28:58 PM PDT by doc1019 (Obama IS running against Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
The Party is not THAT omnipotent. Same sex marriage has NEVER existed in ANY society on earth. But its debatable whether Emmanuel Goldstein betrayed Big Brother and the Party by inciting Eastasia to go to war against Oceania.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 10/20/2008 9:33:03 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The Christian Community has led the drive for this proposition. It’s been an honor to watch.


5 posted on 10/20/2008 9:33:16 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Looks like CA is scheduling itself for another major earthquake. God does not like to be mocked.


6 posted on 10/20/2008 9:33:57 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fee

AMEN!


7 posted on 10/20/2008 9:36:06 PM PDT by doc1019 (Obama IS running against Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
Yep. 61% voted for Prop 22 in 2000.

I went on a 16 mile bike ride today in and around the residential areas of West San Jose, Saratoga, and Cupertino this afternoon, an area that went roughly 65/35 for Kerry/Bush. I saw several hundred political lawn signs, many for local and state offices. I also saw 30-40 signs for Yes on Prop 8. I saw ONE sign for No on Prop 8. Yes on Prop 8 should get 60% of the vote, and it wouldn't surprise me if it got close to 65%.

8 posted on 10/20/2008 9:36:56 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fee

>God does not like to be mocked.

Well, do you?


9 posted on 10/20/2008 9:43:42 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The definitive song on what is next. A man and his goat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov35-fAOyP8


10 posted on 10/20/2008 9:46:22 PM PDT by doug from upland (8 million views of .HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Wasn't it a two minute hate?
11 posted on 10/20/2008 10:10:13 PM PDT by eclecticEel (men who believe deeply in something, even wrong, usually triumph over men who believe in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

A lot of non-white believers have really stepped up to the plate. I saw a news segment on an big Pacific Islander Church organizing. The Chinese Baptist church has Yes on 8 signs all over in English and Chinese - no fear of bricks through the window with them. It has been awesome!


12 posted on 10/20/2008 10:45:57 PM PDT by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The thread in the local news paper about prop 8 is decidedly against the measure.

I tried to post but the hatred against Christians and those just wanting to keep marriage as between a man and a woman is extreme.

The editor of the paper is of course biased since he is an out of the closet homosexual.

The radical fruit loops are screaming about the hundreds of yard signs supporting prop 8.

The enlightened so-called educated crowd has called me everything from a homophobic to a bible thumping right winger who needs to be executed for supporting all the bigot's and racist's.

13 posted on 10/20/2008 11:27:15 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
Yes, it was. I'm convinced though, its a lot longer than Orwell ever envisioned. That is, the intensity of the Left's hate for its opponents is like nothing he foresaw. Its simply venomous in its shocking hate for all that we consider near and dear.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

14 posted on 10/21/2008 12:26:08 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
The Ministry Of Love would be interested in you, my friend. Their light is different from the True Light Of God!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

15 posted on 10/21/2008 12:27:32 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

16 posted on 10/21/2008 12:29:30 AM PDT by narses (http://www.youtube.com/TheMouthPeace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

17 posted on 10/21/2008 8:48:46 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: YES on PROP 4. *** MCCAIN-PALIN ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson