Skip to comments.
Will the Church Split Along Red and Blue Lines?
insidecatholic.com ^
| 10/09/08
| Deal W. Hudson
Posted on 10/09/2008 7:12:15 PM PDT by Publius804
Will the Church Split Along Red and Blue Lines?
by Deal W. Hudson
10/09/08
An Obama victory on November 4 is far from certain, but the momentum behind his campaign prompts me to wonder: What impact could an Obama administration have on the Catholic Church?
The Bush victories in 2000 and 2004 brought a flood of commentary on the so-called red and blue states. If Obama wins in 2008, I would not be surprised to see the emergence of a similar division among Catholics.
Many will finally realize, and admit to, the power of the political Left in their Church. This may lead to a kind of red state, blue state divide among Catholics in the United States. Such a divide could extend to the dioceses, reflecting both regional differences and the leadership of present and past bishops.
Most Catholics miss the institutionalized dissent, political liberalism, and Democratic Party alignment that exists throughout parts of the Church in this country. It exists in a network that includes parts of the USCCB and extends through chanceries, universities (especially Jesuit), Catholic organizations, and much of the Catholic media.
This network has become adept at cloaking its dissent, its political intentions, and its disdain for the agenda of Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. It's a well-chronicled story that is gaining traction with more Catholics because of events surrounding this election.
(Excerpt) Read more at insidecatholic.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholicvote; mccain; obama; prolife; religiousleft; usccb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: mimaw
Poland has the sole remaining Catholic majority; Spain, Ireland and the Czech Republic still have functioning Catholic minority parties—a resistance movement, as it were.
41
posted on
10/09/2008 9:07:29 PM PDT
by
Philo-Junius
(One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
To: Atticus
I’ve been carefully monitoring yard signs in my neighborhood. I still can’t get over the “Notre Dame” house where both parents attended ND and sent all 3 kids there. Active, church-going Roman Catholic. Never had a yard sign up before this year ... helluva candidate to decide to go with, given their backgrounds.
42
posted on
10/09/2008 9:12:00 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Publius804
I don’t know how any Christian could support either major candidate.
43
posted on
10/09/2008 9:15:07 PM PDT
by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
To: nobama08
The Catholics who support Obama or who are dimocrat and support the abortion plank of their platform excommunicate themselves by doing so. Here's what 26 out of 56 bishops say.
Updated: American Bishops who have spoken against Pelosi
Here is the complete list of American bishops who have responded to Nancy Pelosi's comments so far:
-
-
... Bishop James Conley, his auxiliary, joined him
-
-
-
... Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, chairman of the Committee on Doctrine, joined him
-
-
-
Bishop David Zubik of Pittsburgh and...
-
-
-
... Bishop Oscar Cantu, his auxiliary bishop, has joined him
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cardinal
Francis George of Chicago, President of the US Bishops,
has weighed-in
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
{Last updated on September 10th.}
Notes:
-
Previous #23 has been removed. Bishop Joseph Gossman of Raleigh, NC is actually the bishop emeritus, and the new bishop, Michael Burbidge has not, to my knowledge, made a personal statement.
-
Previous #16 has also been removed, it was an erroneous duplication of current #13.
-
#26 was added September 10th, although he published his column September 6th
44
posted on
10/09/2008 9:25:01 PM PDT
by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: mimaw
“I didn’t think there were any Catholics left in Europe. The church has no influence in Spain France or even Italy. I think Poland is the only Catholic country left.”
You made my point. They’ve had a 60+ year political alliance with the Marxists in Europe on “social justice” and, like I said, they “won” in politics, along with their Marxists allies and the potential new generations noticed there was no distinction between the Catholic position and the socialists position, on nearly every social issue, and concluded since the socialists shared the moral point of view with Catholics, then why bother with being a Catholic.
The Church survived in Poland as a protest against the Communist dictatorship. Give them a couple generations in the constant intellectual embrace of western Europe and the Polish Parishes will be empty too.
45
posted on
10/09/2008 10:23:07 PM PDT
by
Wuli
To: Wuli
The prognosis for the Church in Poland is brighter than nearly anywhere else in Europe, since it escaped having its hierarchy dominated by the political elites as in much of the rest of Catholic states on the Continent, or becoming entangled in revolutionary social movements as in Ireland.
Nations with historically republican tendencies like Poland may prove to be the healthiest soil for Catholicism over the long run.
46
posted on
10/09/2008 10:45:14 PM PDT
by
Philo-Junius
(One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
To: xzins
Catholics are not allowed to vote pro-abortion are they? That is my understanding and this has been reiterated by the Pope and several bishops recently. Unfortunately, there are some who ignore this. Abortion is a mortal sin, it is not justifiable under any circumstances -- despite what some would have us believe, there is no "grey area" here.
Arent they disinvited from communion if they do?
Theoretically, a Catholic can excommunicate themselves through certain actions, I'm not sure where this falls into that. A Catholic voting for a pro-abortion politician is somewhat different from a Catholic politician voting to support abortion.
I would love to see a priest publicly refuse to give Communion to someone like Biden and Pelosi. It would be a seemingly insignificant act, but it would open the eyes of millions of voters including many non-Catholics.
47
posted on
10/10/2008 4:50:52 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: RocketMan1
Ill vote for McCain .. but mostly for SARAHI was leading prayer meetings just prior to the Bush/Gore election from 8 years ago.
Listening to others and the voice of God in the room, I encounter principles that have guided me through politics and politicians.
Instead of nit-picking every detail of a candidate, Look for these high-road principles - 1) Do they support the country of Israel? 2) Do they support life for the unborn child? and 3) What is their position and life message about the Lord Jesus Christ?
I have found that everything else that I value will line up under these principles.
48
posted on
10/10/2008 4:59:18 AM PDT
by
Dustoff45
(A non-posting Freeper produces far fewer spelling errors)
To: Wuli
The Obama campaign is just the current leading edge of the same course the Catholic left wants to take here.In that case you should have no trouble naming a few Bishops who publicly support Obama's position on abortion, or who even hint that a vote for him is permissable.
To: chris_bdba
Why should they go to a protestant church when the Catholic Church is more then willing to accept them as they turn a blind eye?
50
posted on
10/10/2008 5:24:59 AM PDT
by
winodog
To: nobama08
I am not Catholic but I do not understand how any true Catholic could or would support Nobama. Because the Catholic Church openly supports socialism. There is no basis for this support in the Bible since the Bible states the Church should do charity in Jesus name, and the last time I looked the government did not do socialism in Jesus name....but then I come from a church that takes the Bible word for word, I mean if it is really Gods word then picking and choosing what you want to follow out of it makes no sense.
To: Lady Heron
Because the Catholic Church openly supports socialism.Source, please.
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
“In that case you should have no trouble naming a few Bishops who publicly support Obama’s position on abortion, or who even hint that a vote for him is permissable.”
No, it is you who should have no trouble naming each and every U.S. Roman Catholic Bishop that has come out and said, publicly, Obama’s position on abortion is wrong, and not just in some mealy-mouthed statement of what that position is without saying anything about those in high office who oppose it. Silence is the speaker, when “social justice” is preferred over pro-life. That’s the way it was done in Europe and that’s the way it’s being done here.
53
posted on
10/10/2008 7:40:59 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: Wuli
To: nobama08; Publius804; lightman
I do understand how a true Christian (Catholic or otherwise) can vote for Barack Hussein Obama, despite his noxious ideologies (which may include some that have not been made public, such as his true relationships with Christianity and islam).
Very many Americans are panicked by their personal financial situations, and the financial situation of the nation and the world. When people are panicked, they close their eyes and vote for change. It’s that simple.
Of course, the “religious left” (whether Catholic or otherwise) would vote for Hussein no matter what. But the trend towards Obama seen in the polls in recent weeks is driven by panic, not by agreement with Obams’s leftist and globalist ideology or his dubious connection to Christianity.
55
posted on
10/10/2008 8:12:22 AM PDT
by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: CitizenUSA
Even more to the point: The Ten Commandments.
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s, wife, nor his ox nor sheep, nor anything else that belongs to him.
Covetousness—the basis for class envy and the foundation of marxism. ‘We want what you worked hard to achieve, so we’ll take it from you and give it to us’
The entire socialist/marxist philosophy is based on sin.
My 2 cents.
To: lightman; Parmy; aberaussie; SmithL; redgolum; RebelBanker; Archie Bunker on steroids; ...
As a former ELCA Lutheran who was recently received into the Orthodox Church (I will have been Orthodox for six months later in October!!), but who still participates in online traditionalist Lutheran lists, I have a slightly different perspective.
An increasing number of openly noncelebate gaysbians are being ordained in the ELCA all the time, using the “restraint from discipline” loophole. It’s not even news when a new one is ordained. To me,they are “what’s his name from Atlanta”, “what’s her name from Texas”, etc. Whatever happens at the Churchwide Assembly next year, this issue has already been decided.
Moreover, new elections of ELCA synodical bishops over time are replacing traditionalist bishops with revisonist “bishops”. This happens in some cases even in what are considered Red States. The new “bishops” support the entire revisionist agenda, not just the “gay” issue.
Above all, the disgustingly feminazi “Evangelical Lutheran Worship” (”ELW”) liturgy and hymnal continues its satanic, erosive work. “As we worship, so we believe.”
A very astute article in a recent issue of “First Things” concluded that the “mainline” protestant church (and its function of providing the cultural bedrock of American culture) is dead. The ELCA is no exception. (Even Roman Catholics are affected.) It’s time to migrate to tradionalist church bodies, whether as individuals/families or as congregations. The WRONG way to do things is to drop out from church altogether, as many are doing.
Of course, I believe that the Orthodox Church is Home for Lutherans and for others. I may have been pushed out of the ELCA by “ELW”, but I was also drawn into Orthodoxy by relaizing that I was basically Orthodox already.
57
posted on
10/10/2008 8:36:34 AM PDT
by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
“Updated: American Bishops who have spoken against Pelosi”
Like I said, the silence on Obama is THE KEY. They think they can get away with it because he’s not a Catholic and people like Pelosi and Biden are. They KNOW what they are NOT doing. It was the same in Europe.
58
posted on
10/10/2008 9:09:18 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: reagandemocrat
reagandemocrat: “The entire socialist/marxist philosophy is based on sin.”
True. True. As you wrote, it is based on greed (covetousness).
59
posted on
10/10/2008 2:41:40 PM PDT
by
CitizenUSA
(Voting proudly for GOVERNOR Palin for VP!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson