Skip to comments.
David Brooks: Sarah Palin "Represents A Fatal Cancer To The Republican Party"
E-mailed to me
| October 8, 2008
| Danny Shea
Posted on 10/08/2008 3:16:45 PM PDT by publius1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-197 next last
To: publius1
Brooks speaks with the unintentienal insularity of the MSM elite, and doesn't seem to understand that some old fashioned common sense will win every time.
To: DallasBiff
RE: “David Brooks being his eastern elite catty metrosexual self.”
You sure that’s just “metro” and not “homo?” He sure seems like the latter to me .... not that there’s anything wrong with that (ha)
To: publius1
If Obama is so smart, how did he come to the conclusion that going into Iraq was a bad thing? Did he have daily briefings from the CIA? Did he have daily briefings from the NSA? Did he have the intelligence agencies and leaders of all countries in the Security Council of the United Nations agreeing with Bush that Iraq was a potential danger?
I doubt it. In 2002 he was a bumbling local politician in Illinois. He probably didn't even have accurate readings on the local Chinese restaurant's take out menu.
You simply cannot take the known information in October 2002 and come to any conclusion other than the one that President Bush, VP Cheney, President Clinton, Senator Clinton, Senator Rockefeller, and a list of 75 other senators and 300+ congressmen came to. You cannot find a Karnaugh map or a series of logic gates anywhere on the planet that would have come up with a different scenario.
So how did Obama miss it by so much? His critical thinking ability is simply flawed and right now American are dumb enough to put him in office.
To: publius1
David Brooks spoke frankly about the presidential and vice presidential candidates Monday afternoon, calling Sarah Palin a "fatal cancer to the Republican party" but describing John McCain and Barack Obama as "the two best candidates we've had in a long time." No wonder he's the captive pet "conservative" of the MSM.
44
posted on
10/08/2008 3:30:49 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Bushonomics: Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses......."PAULSON'S THEFT")
To: publius1
That’s really rich: David Brooks talking about Sarah Palin’s ‘prejudices’ (after he’s concluded she is a yahoo with no interest in ideas).
To: pogo101
Sarah Palin has accomplished more in her life and had more of impact on the lives of others than David Brooks could ever dream of. Let him engage in his mastrabatory prose sitting in the clouds above the masses. Who gives a crap about him or his ilk? They are the ones who are a cancer on the GOP.
46
posted on
10/08/2008 3:30:49 PM PDT
by
kabar
(.)
To: publius1
47
posted on
10/08/2008 3:30:49 PM PDT
by
Radix
(If Alaska were to secede from the Union it would probably become a power player in OPEC)
To: publius1
In his dreams. Sarah Palin may just be the one (with all of us) dragging McCain over the victory line
To: Parley Baer
"Brooks is definitely hallucinating."
Sarah is a MAJOR threat to his "Governing Conservatism" rejection of the traditional Reagan style limited government conservatism. If she becomes the new face of the party it surely will not be going down the path he has been advocating and he will become even more irrelevant than he is now.
49
posted on
10/08/2008 3:31:09 PM PDT
by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: publius1
Gay wannabees like Brooks hate strong women.
50
posted on
10/08/2008 3:31:24 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
(Mohamed yunikku khinaaziir)
To: kabar
51
posted on
10/08/2008 3:31:43 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
To: devere
I agree. If we want to read that garbage all we have to do go to any msm website
To: publius1
Brooks is making the mistake that anybody actually gives a rat’s arse what he thinks.
53
posted on
10/08/2008 3:32:29 PM PDT
by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism)
To: publius1
Brooks, Scarborough,Carlson(tucker), George Will,Noonan etc, are all Pieces of crap...Sorry somebody had to say it.
54
posted on
10/08/2008 3:32:35 PM PDT
by
Friendofgeorge
(Obama on the other hand does not know the Lord Jesus, and is only the Lords enemy)
To: publius1
LOL, that just cracks me up. She has a spine and they don’t like it.
55
posted on
10/08/2008 3:32:47 PM PDT
by
television is just wrong
(The Democrats have lost cabin pressure and the oxygen masks have dropped.)
To: Minus_The_Bear; Scarchin; Rb ver. 2.0; Bird Jenkins; Y Ceratotherium; WOSG; jschner; ...
See post #38
Minus_The_Bear says: “Romney and his supporters are scum.”
What do you say?
56
posted on
10/08/2008 3:32:51 PM PDT
by
Checkers
(Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
To: Diogenesis
What shade of lipstick is that?
57
posted on
10/08/2008 3:34:04 PM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(Please pray daily for OUR Sarah.)
To: publius1
David Brooks is a little hairy wart, easily excised.
58
posted on
10/08/2008 3:34:34 PM PDT
by
Poincare
To: publius1
"Out of the blue I say, 'Ever read a guy named Reinhold Niebuhr?"Is that a common pick up line in fag bars?
59
posted on
10/08/2008 3:35:06 PM PDT
by
webrover
To: publius1
"The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg at New York's Le Cirque restaurant...."
Gosh, one hardly knows where to begin...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-197 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson