Skip to comments.
U.S. judge orders release of 17 Guantánamo detainees
International Heral Tribune ^
| 10/8/2008
| BWilliam Glaberson
Posted on 10/08/2008 10:20:55 AM PDT by doc30
A federal judge has ordered the Bush administration to release 17 detainees at Guantánamo by the end of the week, the first such ruling in nearly seven years of legal disputes over the administration's detention policies.
The judge, Ricardo Urbina of U.S. District Court, ordered Tuesday that the 17 men be brought to his courtroom Friday from Guantánamo, where they have been held since 2002. He indicated that he would release the men, members of the restive Uighur Muslim minority of western China, into the care of supporters in the United States, initially in the Washington area.
"I think the moment has arrived for the court to shine the light of constitutionality on the reasons for detention," Urbina said.
(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alreadyposted; enemycombatant; gitmo; judiciary; trysearch; wot; yesterdaysnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
These guys sound like Mulsim terrorists caught by the U.S. in training camps, but were planning on targeting China. And China wants them back for punishment.
1
posted on
10/08/2008 10:20:55 AM PDT
by
doc30
To: doc30
How many soldiers does Judge Urbina have?
Right. Not enough.
2
posted on
10/08/2008 10:24:36 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Clinging bitterly to religion and guns. My Bible cover has a holster on the back.)
To: doc30
If Bush had any cajones he would refuse. Just say: “sorry, we will choose not to abide by your ruling ... take us to court”.
schu
3
posted on
10/08/2008 10:25:43 AM PDT
by
schu
To: doc30
|
Photo: R. Strauss/Smithsonian
Chambers: (202) 354-3390
Courtroom Deputy: Jim Dales (202) 354-3151
Court Reporter: Wendy Ricard (202) 354-3111 |
Judge Ricardo M. Urbina
Judge Urbina was appointed to the United States District Court in July 1994. He received a B.A. in 1967 from Georgetown University and graduated from the Georgetown University Law Center in 1970. He served as staff attorney for the D.C. Public Defender Service from 1970 to 1972 and then entered private practice. From 1974 to 1981 he taught at Howard University Law School and directed the University's Criminal Justice Program. He was appointed Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in April 1981, and served as Presiding Judge of the Court's Family Division from 1985 to 1988. Click Here to go to Judge Urbina's Court Webpage. |
|
4
posted on
10/08/2008 10:27:47 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: schu
During WWII, we locked up Japanese, right or wrong, because we “thought” they could be our enemies. Today, we take “know” enemies and turn them loose on our own soil......in our nations capital no less. Great, just great.
5
posted on
10/08/2008 10:29:29 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: doc30
Ready on the right, ready on the left, ready on the firing line....
6
posted on
10/08/2008 10:29:45 AM PDT
by
gundog
(I'm a bitter gun owner, and I vote.)
To: doc30
Well, release them then. To the Chinese.
Let's even show we're compassionate by giving the Chicoms the bullets to execute them, thereby sparing their families of a bill to pay.
7
posted on
10/08/2008 10:30:15 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: doc30
This is a complicated case if you read the full article. If they got sent back to Chine they'd wish they were still at Club Gitmo.
8
posted on
10/08/2008 10:30:42 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Sarah. We crave red meat. Red meat!)
To: RC2
Today, we take know enemies Except these guys are not known enemies. They are Uighurs who are fighting against the Chicoms. Federal courts have repeatedly ruled they are not a threat to the US. So how can they be held as enemy combatants?
9
posted on
10/08/2008 10:33:23 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: P-Marlowe
I can see the guy demanding they be released if that's the way he sees it. I cannot see him releasing them to the United States.
Simply amazing...
Join the DoughtyOne FReepathon Challenge today. Let's color in this pencil. You can read about the challenge here. Go to the thread.
Read about the FReepathon Challenge. If it sounds like something you would like to take part in, please do. Thank you.
10
posted on
10/08/2008 10:37:38 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(McCain, the Ipecac president... Obama the strychnine president...)
To: schu
I have some insight into this. They should be released.
Can’t say no more
11
posted on
10/08/2008 10:38:48 AM PDT
by
PatriotCJC
(Keep your powder dry!)
To: dirtboy
Why were they picked up?
Were they picnicing in the wrong countryside?
12
posted on
10/08/2008 10:39:18 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(Good Grief.)
To: P-Marlowe
A Klinton appointee - I could've guessed.
13
posted on
10/08/2008 10:39:26 AM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Just your average "Whitey" - clinging to my guns and religion!)
To: doc30
If they are to be released in Washington I might suggest they be released in Congress. Let the Democrats have a lottery to see who can keep them on what night!
14
posted on
10/08/2008 10:39:39 AM PDT
by
nclaurel
(No white flags from America in Iraq--hear that Biden!)
To: doc30
We should reach out to our good friends in China and ship the Moslem's to them for disposal.
15
posted on
10/08/2008 10:43:14 AM PDT
by
webrover
To: The Sons of Liberty
A Klinton appointee - I could've guessed.What do you want to bet he was confirmed 100-0?
16
posted on
10/08/2008 10:43:38 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: doc30
I think when a judge makes a decision like this, he should be completely totally responsible for what these people do afterwards, and anyone harmed by them should be able to bring suit against him.
17
posted on
10/08/2008 10:44:27 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(Obama--Keep the change!)
To: dirtboy
Except these guys are not known enemies. They are Uighurs who are fighting against the Chicoms. Federal courts have repeatedly ruled they are not a threat to the US. So how can they be held as enemy combatants? They are being held as, "We don't want them, but no one who isn't going to just kill them will take them."
18
posted on
10/08/2008 10:47:29 AM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: nclaurel
“”If they are to be released in Washington I might suggest they be released in Congress. Let the Democrats have a lottery to see who can keep them on what night!””
One in each Democrat’s DC residence for a year - then rotate them from now until eternity.
To: McGruff
"they'd wish they were still at Club Gitmo."Works for me!
20
posted on
10/08/2008 10:51:06 AM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the hell out of the way!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson