Skip to comments.
NRA's second wave (ad/video at link)
politico.com ^
| 10/06/08
| politico
Posted on 10/06/2008 7:38:19 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: TornadoAlley3
Nice, the NRA has really put in some effort this cycle.
2
posted on
10/06/2008 7:40:12 AM PDT
by
padre35
(Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
To: padre35
Hmmm. If Barak Obama wins, the NRA may be in serious trouble...
3
posted on
10/06/2008 7:41:24 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
To: TornadoAlley3
4
posted on
10/06/2008 7:43:15 AM PDT
by
Feline_AIDS
(Because canine AIDS ain't funny.)
To: TornadoAlley3
Alright. This will cost The One a few votes in those areas.
L
5
posted on
10/06/2008 7:44:41 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(She's not a lesbian, she doesn't whine, she doesn't hate her country, and she's not afraid of guns.)
To: Little Ray
No, if Barak wins we will be in trouble. The NRA will grow like crazy.
6
posted on
10/06/2008 7:45:42 AM PDT
by
Hugin
(Mecca delenda est!)
To: TornadoAlley3
Uh, wouldn’t the border issues ad be against Juan McCain (as well as against The Messiah?
7
posted on
10/06/2008 7:51:14 AM PDT
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: Little Ray
It will not be only NRA in trouble. Remember the “slick” years? Not a peep against the real subversives and terrorists. They went after us Right Wingers pretty aggressively because we “were their enemy”. The jackboots at ATF will be happy to help nobama out. You can bet that FR is also already in their sights.
8
posted on
10/06/2008 7:51:34 AM PDT
by
dusttoyou
To: Little Ray
It will not be only NRA in trouble. Remember the “slick” years? Not a peep against the real subversives and terrorists. They went after us Right Wingers pretty aggressively because we “were their enemy”. The jackboots at ATF will be happy to help nobama out. You can bet that FR is also already in their sights.
9
posted on
10/06/2008 7:54:01 AM PDT
by
dusttoyou
To: snowrip
“Juan McCain” doesn’t want to take away your right to protect yourself. Obambi does.
10
posted on
10/06/2008 7:54:15 AM PDT
by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: dusttoyou
11
posted on
10/06/2008 7:58:42 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: SW6906
True. Now, if we can just make him see the light on amnesty.
Awesome tagline. Just got my four cords of seasoned mixed hardwood delivered... and just purchased another 1000 rounds for my new rifle.
12
posted on
10/06/2008 7:58:51 AM PDT
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
13
posted on
10/06/2008 8:08:02 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: TornadoAlley3
I am surpised they are not running ads in west & central PA. Lots of hunters in PA.
14
posted on
10/06/2008 8:09:06 AM PDT
by
Frantzie
To: TornadoAlley3
"Do you support the ban on handgun ownership?" -- Yes, Barack Obama, 2003
I so not say this lightly, but I believe a large-scale attempt to confiscate peoples' guns will result in substantial violence.
To: TornadoAlley3
I’d like to see the NRA publicize how Obama tried to squelch their ads. It’s not just a 2nd Amendment issue, but a 1st Amendment issue as well.
16
posted on
10/06/2008 8:13:03 AM PDT
by
Poincare
To: TornadoAlley3
These ads will only make the difference in a close race. We are facing a 7-8 point spread. John McCain has GOT to get this race tighter.
17
posted on
10/06/2008 8:17:56 AM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: pabianice
I so not say this lightly, but I believe a large-scale attempt to confiscate peoples' guns will result in substantial violence. You're certainly right about it.
And if Obama wins, the democrats will think they have the mandate of the 'people' this time ... and try it.
18
posted on
10/06/2008 8:38:58 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(McCain/Palin 2008 : Palin the Paladin 2012)
To: padre35
We don’t own guns (yet), but joined the NRA anyway.
19
posted on
10/06/2008 8:39:38 AM PDT
by
Tidbit
(Shoot low boys, they're riding Shetland Ponies.)
To: dusttoyou
You can bet that FR is also already in their sights. In their sights? My FRiend, this place probably has had whole shifts of folks over at NSA as dedicated lurkers since 1999. Not just lurkers, either. Back in those days there were a number of active freepers who were thought to be NSA trolls sowing disinformation and dissension in the ranks. They were pretty well identified, but not much was done. This was before the emergence of the VIKING KITTY and the fearsome ZOT!
20
posted on
10/06/2008 8:57:21 AM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson