Posted on 10/04/2008 5:48:37 PM PDT by EagleUSA
I received a phone call from Phil J. Berg a few minutes ago. He informed me that a rumor is circulating on the Internet that the Court has ruled on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee in the Berg v. Obama case. Some of the visitors to this website have posted comments claiming the Court has ruled. The comments on this site were written by visitors to the site.
On Mr. Berg's behalf, I am posting this to state clearly the Court has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss in Berg v. Obama.
Here's the status:
1. Last week Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee filed a Motion to Dismiss the Berg v. Obama lawsuit. 2. On Monday, Mr. Berg filed an answer requesting that the suit not be dismissed and that the Court order production of documents proving Senator Obama's consitutional qualifications to serve as President of The United States. 3. As of 1 AM EST today, October 2nd, 2008, the Court has not ruled on the Motion for Dismissal in Berg v. Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamacrimes.com ...
There is so much left to the 'dark' here re Obama that is defies Reason.
Which is not to say; that REASON here, will prevail. I hope it does; but. . .Obama has a 'deep reach' to enabling resources; that have yet to be explained.
or maybe even says mohammed
either way he’s hiding something to go to all this
I can’t believe a brother from Chicago can’t be paid off to tell us the dirt on Obama when he was a street agitator...
so no college either
for the love of this country Obama needs to be exposed so much that even the biggest loon out there won’t vote for hiim
And of course, why mention his arrogance and political ruthlessness. . .
The title of this thread pisses me off. Why is this an internet rumor? If a forged document from a non-existing source (Lucy Ramirez?) and be all over the MSM then why is this story not being covered? (I do know the answer)
It's the document that Berg provided to the judge asking him to sign it. Until the judge signs it, it is not legal.
Timeline of the Berg case:
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/
Of course; the Dems already created that 'other' myth; so as to protect them from their own machinations; that myth, now written and etched in American's 'consciousness'. . .that the Repubs stole the election from the real Dem winner; Algore. . .
And so, the Constitution; as a 'living,breathing' Document; will take a giant breath here and exhale a 'kinder, gentler' interpretation. . .if this IS challenged; post Election.
1. Obama s vault version (certified copy of his original long version)
Birth Certificate; and
2. A certified copy of Obama s Certification of Citizenship;
3. A Certified copy of Obama s Oath of Allegiance.
Obviously somebody invented 1, 2, and 3, which I don't know how it originated and why.
I know Berg was on Coast 2 Coast because I stayed up and listened to a lot of it. Unless that guy was an imposter.
Acorn vouched for Obama already.
His lawyer works for a private law firm that has done work for the DNC for years. I found one non-blog source that says that one of his clients was CAIR.
5.56mm
I wish his opponents in the primary had vetted him - or the lamestream media.
I certainly agree Obama is a disaster and that if he should be ineligible, it would be a mess to discover after the election.
But I can also see the legal position, there’s no system in place for checking eligibility and the courts cannot take that role on everyone who ever runs.
thanks for your reply.
Am wondering why there cannot be charges of attempted ‘fraud’ given that ‘Obama’ Inc. knew the truth; if this is in fact true. . .as he has taken money from all over the world; he has used tax money; Government resources et al; for what is actually a perpetration of fraud. . .
Well, maybe that way, but you’d also have to prove his knowledge and intent. And I think he intends to be president (and steal money that way. :) And he could plausibly deny knowledge - perhaps.
But it’s a good thought you got there...
He’s not above the law, I just don’t think Sarah is the one who should be out front on this. There’s a law suit by a democrat lawyer under way right now and he’s a Hillary supporter. Let them air that particular piece of dirty laundry. Rush isn’t even running with this.
Obama have never once submitted to the type of security background check that a Private in the United States Marine Corps would have to go through to become a gate guard at a US Embassy.
In fact his refusal to do so is the reason that while the head of the Harvard law review he never once interned within the Federal Justice system under a Circuit Court Judge or a Supreme Court Justice.
A distinction Obama is the sole holder of, no other Harvard Law review president has ever distanced themselves from the US legal system in the way Obama did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.