Posted on 10/04/2008 5:48:37 PM PDT by EagleUSA
I received a phone call from Phil J. Berg a few minutes ago. He informed me that a rumor is circulating on the Internet that the Court has ruled on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee in the Berg v. Obama case. Some of the visitors to this website have posted comments claiming the Court has ruled. The comments on this site were written by visitors to the site.
On Mr. Berg's behalf, I am posting this to state clearly the Court has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss in Berg v. Obama.
Here's the status:
1. Last week Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee filed a Motion to Dismiss the Berg v. Obama lawsuit. 2. On Monday, Mr. Berg filed an answer requesting that the suit not be dismissed and that the Court order production of documents proving Senator Obama's consitutional qualifications to serve as President of The United States. 3. As of 1 AM EST today, October 2nd, 2008, the Court has not ruled on the Motion for Dismissal in Berg v. Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamacrimes.com ...
Do you have a link for this statement?
what is being covered up and why go to great lengths?...........
It is obvious that the MSM want to cover this up.
I was speaking with a friend about the election, pro McCain, and he did not know about this because not everyone uses the Internet like we do.
So where are the 527’s on this issue and others. They must be starting soon. I cannot believe no one is coming to McCain-Palin’s aid with all the bull that is on Obama.
this unfolding would move this country to a riotious free-fall.
**************
Even chemo causes a “freefall” of hair before the cure.
Pursue justice man. Why does Obama get another set of rules? Screw the cost. Justice!
So what happens if he isn’t a citizen at this late date —a new election date set as the DNC gets a new candidate
Talk about a crisis in this country
The election goes forward and if he cannot prove he is eligible to take the office, then the VP takes the office.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2096874/posts
I just did a quick google but this is the first link at the top but there are many
I typed in obama get CAIR lawyer in berg lawsuit
Hope this helps
Well, birds still fly. . .
But until he wins there is no violation to be considered.
This is the same point the judge made concerning a similar challenge to McCain.
You know it’s funny you say that as I have met many many people who have neevr heard about AYERS, .
A woman who is voting for obama at he docs office told me that I was making it up.
Told her to go home and type in on her computer
Many have no heard about him getting a CAIR lawyer so he doesn’t have to show his birth certificate.
Many think he never heard the racist stuff Wright said or even obama saying typical white people or greedy white folk
imagine if Palin said greedy black folk of just a typical black person
you can bet your house the media would never let that drop
republicans need to say all this on live camera so it can’t be edited.
The public needs to know how dangerous and racist , sexist obama is.
Not fogetting his angry racist wife
If the Justia.com web site is legit the document is posted there.
Maybe the person purporting to represent Berg is a faker.
There’s no denying it.
Voters have the right to know at the time they cast their ballot that their candidate is eligible for office under the requirements of the Constitution. I do not understand why the FEC is not actively investigating the qualifications of ALL the candidates---including OBAMA. They should be the clearing house to insure that the eligibility requirement has been met. By the way, I did send a message to the FEC to express this concern.
Does anyone still believe that Obama is a US citizen? If so, why? What would be his reasons for not complying with the court?
No they do not.
The Constitution does not prohibit anyone from running for president merely because they are not qualified. The constitution merely prohibits someone who is not qualified from taking the office.
The Voters have no rights to any information regarding a candidate. They do not have a "right" to know his age, his birthplace, his sex, his height, his weight or his criminal record.
He won’t produce an actual document from the state of Hawaii? He won’t produce his college transcripts? What in the hell is this guy hiding?
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.