Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax Earmarks, Pork and Other Bailout Bill Horrors
HUMAN EVENTS ^ | 10/02/2008 | Ross Kaminsky

Posted on 10/02/2008 9:38:40 PM PDT by neverdem

If you were wondering how the Bush/Paulson financial bailout bill slipped past the Senate last night, the answer is all too familiar: too many senators signed onto this monstrosity after their pet pork was included.

And what were among the emergencies that were included? This allegedly critical financial rescue bill is loaded down with tax breaks (or more precisely, extensions of current tax breaks) for such emergencies as:

-- “Wooden arrows designed for use by children” This provision was put into the bill by Oregon Senators Smith and Wyden for the primary benefit of an Oregon arrow manufacturer…estimated to save arrow companies $200,000 annually. -- “Motorsports racing track facilities” A Bloomberg article notes this “will save NASCAR track builders $109 million this year.” -- Rum producers in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands -- Investors in the District of Columbia or on Indian reservations. -- Building and renovating restaurants, -- Book donations to public schools, and -- Recipients of settlement payments from Exxon Valdez litigation

The connection between that pork and freeing the credit market from the burden of sub-prime mortgages isn’t quite clear.

The financial bailout bill includes extending the “exemption of undercover operations (by the IRS) from certain laws” or giving $50 million and $100 million to Midwestern states for “disaster relief,” even though crops have recovered extremely well after this year’s flooding.

While the conservative media rails at the pork barrel items in the financial bailout bill, the other measures in the bill may be even worse.

The most egregious, most frightening aspect of this bill is its hidden attack on every aspect of our economy under the cover of anti-carbon measures contained in what is essentially an energy bill tacked on to the bailout -- an energy bill which would not pass Congress were it to come up for a vote.

Section 117 of the bailout bill calls for this:

“The Secretary of the Treasury shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to undertake a comprehensive review of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to identify the types of and specific tax provisions that have the largest effects on carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions and to estimate the magnitude of those effects.”

So the radical environmentalists’ path to a ‘carbon trading’ system -- which both Sens. Obama and McCain favor -- would be cleared of underbrush so that our economy could be strangled with the European system as soon as possible.

If you own a power plant, a steel factory, a dairy farm, or an airline company, or maybe even just a car, this is a large caliber weapon aimed directly at you. It’s the predicate to taxing carbon emissions.

Section 116 of the bill adds language to the tax code which includes “industrial source carbon dioxide” in a list of items which can be classified as sources of “qualified income,” along with things like fertilizer and timber. However, since nobody produces “industrial source CO2” as a product for sale, this change is unclear.

An energy policy analyst at the National Taxpayers Union whom I asked about the provision believes it may be targeting either expected future creation of a “cap-and-trade” regime or voluntary creation of a CO2 trading industry. However, since many publicly traded partnerships are related to energy production, it would not surprise me to see the provision misused against gas and oil producers in much the same way that the naming of the polar bear as a “threatened species” will be used against American industry (as John Kerry has already demonstrated.)

But that's not all

The bill doubles the subsidy for biodiesel production from 50 cents per gallon to $1.00 per gallon. Doesn’t the Senate realize that we can’t save the world by burning our food? Did they not remember the huge increase in food prices over the past two years due in large part to these subsidies diverting food and feed crops into our gas tanks?

The energy provisions in the bailout also include darlings of the environmental left: tax credits for “small wind property,” “geothermal heat pump systems,” and “electricity produced from marine renewables.”

While tax breaks for alternative energy aren’t necessarily objectionable, the inclusion of them in this bill removes incentive for Democrats to cooperate on a comprehensive energy bill which would include drilling for oil and gas or developing clean coal or nuclear power sources. The effect of this bill, then, will be to keep us from developing efficient large-scale energy sources. Small wind properties will not lower prices at the pump.

It’s not just energy policy where the bailout bill will raise costs for Americans.

The bill includes the “Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Program,” expected to cost $3.2 billion over six years and to be used not just for schools but also to “implement stewardship objectives that enhance forest ecosystems,” support programs which “control noxious and exotic weeds” and enhance “soil productivity” or “improve cooperative relationships among the people that use and care for Federal land and the agencies that manage the Federal land.”

Excuse me? The financial bailout bill pays for a marketing campaign for the Forestry Service or the Bureau of Land Management so we’ll like them better?

As if that weren’t bad enough, the bailout bill also contains the “Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008,” which is also known by the bill number S.558. The measure requires group insurance plans to have deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and annual and lifetime limits for mental health and drug addition/abuse coverage which are no more restrictive or expensive for the policy holder than those same items for other medical and surgical coverage. The measure would apply to firms with 50 or more employees.

The full CBO report makes the following statements:

-- “The direct costs of the mandate (on the private sector) in S. 558 would be $1.5 billion in 2009, rising to $3.4 billion in 2013.” -- “Enacting S. 558 would increase federal direct spending for Medicaid by $280 million over the 2009-2012 period and by $790 million over the 2009-2017 period.” There are also another $485 million of “discretionary costs” by 2017. -- “More of an employee's compensation (will be) received in the form of nontaxable employer-paid premiums, and less in the form of taxable wages… CBO estimates that federal tax revenues would fall by $140 million in 2009 and by $3 billion over the 2009-2017 period.” -- “Responses would include reductions in the number of employers offering insurance to their employees and in the number of employees enrolling in employer-sponsored insurance…”

This outrageous federal intrusion into health insurance is exactly the sort of legislation that has made our health insurance system so dysfunctional and expensive.

Despite claims by Harry Reid of great bipartisan work, the bailout bill passed by the Senate last night contains exactly the sort of waste and anti-business payback from Democrats to unions and environmentalists which make Americans distrust and dislike our government.

House members should vote down this travesty and substitute the Republican Study Committee’s alternative for it, and toss it back to the Senate.

Ross Kaminsky blogs at Rossputin.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bailoutbill
Senate Roll Call Vote on Bailout Bill

Read it & weep.

1 posted on 10/02/2008 9:38:40 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So how could Mr no pork, earmark McCain vote for it?
2 posted on 10/02/2008 9:41:50 PM PDT by webrover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And they snuck ACORN back in there too, with cryptic language.


3 posted on 10/02/2008 9:45:07 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webrover
Because he's a politician, that's why. Its amazing how many things that seem urgent in the pressing heat of the moment, no longer seem that way with the passage of time. I don't want the country to be saddled with a very expensive commitment we might not need six months from now. I'm all for throwing the bailout into a House Senate committee to be resolved after the New Year. If we still need it in 2009, then we can always revisit the subject.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 10/02/2008 9:45:34 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

But John McCain also truly campaigns on not voting for any of the “political junk” in any piece of legislation, but then, John McCain also turns around and then truly voted for this socialistic bailout bill that’s also full of pork barrel projects and full of other goodies! John McCain has already harmed his chances, despite what Sarah Palin does, because McCain voted for all of this “political junk”! John McCain is truly a hypocrite, but Barack Obama is even worse on all of the issues! Nice choices that we truly have for ‘08 POTUS, eh?


5 posted on 10/02/2008 9:53:28 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Vote for conservatives AT ALL POLITICAL LEVELS! Encourage all others to do the same on November 4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webrover
So how could Mr no pork, earmark McCain vote for it?

McCain is a creature of the media. All the talking heads are talking about is doing something, anything to start the printing presses at the Treasury.

What I don't understand is why nobody isn't talking about Obama, Acorn, the dems creation of the Community Reinvestment Act and their defense of practices that led to the subprime mortgage disaster.

How the Democrats created the meltdown on Wall Street

6 posted on 10/02/2008 9:57:25 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There's no surprise in this. I brought this up to my Sinators and Reprehensible today.

This is the same old $*** that they pulled with the amnesty bill.

Take something simple (remember, this started out three pages long and we need to pass this right now! Right now and don't question it! Just do it!)

It leaves the Sinate 450 pages long, and no doubt when it leaves the Whores, oops, I mean the House, it will be 900 pages.

And then it will need 200 pages of amendments.

One thing I told them all:

Do you think that the enemies of this country who would like to see it destroyed care one whit about (this)? I guarantee you, they don't.

I can also gurarantee you that they are watching our so-called leadership with glee; they know weakness and pettiness when they see it. They see you are all getting lost in pointless details.

7 posted on 10/02/2008 10:39:21 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
The link in comment# 6 is a good summary of the subprime & Wall St. disaster.

Obama's Thought Police good summary of the bullying so far

No, It Wasn't Phil Gramm's Fault (Pres. Clinton blames Dems for Fannie and Freddie mess)

Dozens of Senators Now Supporting Effort To Repeal The DC Gun Ban

America’s Nervous Breakdown - Should it continue, a world breakdown may follow. Victor Davis Hanson

The War Won’t End in Afghanistan Michael Totten

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

P.S. That's more than enough for now. I have other links for tomorrow.

8 posted on 10/02/2008 10:40:42 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


9 posted on 10/02/2008 10:47:02 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The connection between that pork and freeing the credit market from the burden of sub-prime mortgages isn’t quite clear.

The connection is Wall Street and the greedy bastards that work there. They want their bailout. They want our money.

We are now supposed to finance the federal govt. and Wall Street.

I'm surprised none of these scum have tried to say it's "for the children" yet.

10 posted on 10/03/2008 4:35:10 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
From Hanson's piece:

Even though the U.S. government rushed to restore trust, hundreds of billions of dollars in paper assets simply vanished. Friends and enemies abroad were unsure whether the irregular American heartbeat was a major coronary or a mere cardiac murmur. How strong — really — was the world’s greatest economy? Was this panic the tab for years of borrowing abroad for out-of-control consumer spending? Had America finally gone too far enriching dictators by buying energy that it either could not or would not produce itself? Had the chickens of lavishing rewards on Wall Street and Washington speculators rather than Main Street producers finally come home to roost?

How does that reconcile with blaming only the dems for this mess?

I agree with Hanson. The U.S. has been having a party for the last fifteen years and NOT preparing for the future. Both sides are to blame. We, here on FR and other conservative sites, have been talking about this for years. There really is not much the small minority that we make could have done.

I truly fear for my children's future.

11 posted on 10/03/2008 4:47:00 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Democrat fingerprints are all over the financial crisis
12 posted on 10/03/2008 6:53:46 AM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping.


13 posted on 10/03/2008 7:21:12 AM PDT by GOPJ (It's NOT a rescue, it's a BAILOUT. Coming soon: Mutual&Hedge funds, credit card companies, States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: webrover

I don’t think I’ve ever been as outraged at anything Congress has done as I am at these earmarks. I’m simply furious, and am making this travesty a point of conversation whenever and where ever I can.

Folks, it’s not enough to just spout out on an online forum. Get Mad!! Stay Mad! Get others Mad! If we let this just fade away as our elected jerks expect will happen, we will keep getting this sort of representation.

Get Mad! Stay Mad! Do Something!


14 posted on 10/06/2008 12:52:17 PM PDT by PatKazoo (Get Mad! Stay Mad! Do Something About It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson