Posted on 09/28/2008 4:19:07 PM PDT by txroadkill
For the first time in the 35 years, the Supreme Court has been asked to decide whether this statement is biological fact, or mere ideology: Abortion terminates the life of a human being.
Two U.S. courts disagree over what Roe v. Wade means for this issue, so there are now two Constitutions one in New Jersey, the other in the Eighth Circuits six states. This kind of conflict increases the odds that the United States Supreme Court will step in, and a new case, Acuna v. Turkish, gives it the option to.
On September 29, the high Court will announce whether it plans to do so.
(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...
According to Acuna, Turkish said, Dont be stupid; its only some blood.
Dont be stupid; its only some blood. \
That’s obviously not true. There’s tissue too.
“Meanwhile, in 2005, the South Dakota legislature passed the nations most thorough informed-consent law, requiring abortion clinics to tell women that the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being. The law required doctors to disclose that abortion may cause women psychological harm, and that the mothers relationship with the human being she carries is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Planned Parenthood asked for and received an immediate injunction in a U.S. District Court. The group convinced Judge Karen Schreier that the law infringes on the abortionists right to free speech, because the language of the informed consent was ideological and not biological.”
What textbook is Planned Parenthood reading from?
Their own “ideology” not factual embryology is based on lies, bigotry, population control,and profit.
“Meanwhile, in 2005, the South Dakota legislature passed the nations most thorough informed-consent law, requiring abortion clinics to tell women that the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being. The law required doctors to disclose that abortion may cause women psychological harm, and that the mothers relationship with the human being she carries is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Planned Parenthood asked for and received an immediate injunction in a U.S. District Court. The group convinced Judge Karen Schreier that the law infringes on the abortionists right to free speech, because the language of the informed consent was ideological and not biological.”
What textbook is Planned Parenthood reading from?
Their own “ideology” not factual embryology is based on lies, bigotry, population control,and profit.
“Meanwhile, in 2005, the South Dakota legislature passed the nations most thorough informed-consent law, requiring abortion clinics to tell women that the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being. The law required doctors to disclose that abortion may cause women psychological harm, and that the mothers relationship with the human being she carries is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Planned Parenthood asked for and received an immediate injunction in a U.S. District Court. The group convinced Judge Karen Schreier that the law infringes on the abortionists right to free speech, because the language of the informed consent was ideological and not biological.”
What textbook is Planned Parenthood reading from?
Their own “ideology” not factual embryology is based on lies, bigotry, population control,and profit.
‘It’s dead, Jim’
Sheldon Turkish must be a very old doctor by now, and apparently age has not mellowed him. He delivered me, and according to my mother he was really nasty. Threatened to leave her (in the middle of a difficult delivery) to labor alone with NO doctor, because she didn’t want a spinal injection. His way or the highway.
Step on Dr. Sheldon Turkish’s head; its only some faeces...
Tomorrow, which is also the feast day of Holy Michael the Archangel. PRAY!
I take it this is about informed consent? I guess people aren't paying attention in 8th grade biology? I'm sure being in the honors class had nothing to do with my knowledge at that age.
Saint Michael, The Archangel defend us in battle
Be our safeguard against the wickedness and snares of the devil
My God rebuke him we humbily pray
and do thou Oh Prince of the Heavenly Host
By the Power of God
Cast into Hell, Satan
And all the evil spirits
Who prowl around the world seeking the ruin of souls
Amen.
Its pure science that is beyond dispute. Even w the current SCOTUS line-up I think it has a decent shot.
Heres some ammo for our side:
What does modern science conclude about when human life begins? (Excerpts)
By Dr. John Ankerberg and John Weldon
http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0805W3.htm The complete article is available in print friendly PDF format at: http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/_PDFArchives/apologetics/AP3W0805.pdf
In 1981, the United States Congress conducted hearings to answer the question, “When does human life begin?” A group of internationally known scientists appeared before a Senate judiciary subcommittee.
The U.S. Congress was told by Harvard University Medical Schools Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, “In biology and in medicine, it is an accepted fact that the life of any individual organism reproducing by sexual reproduction begins at conception....”
Dr. Watson A. Bowes, Jr., of the University of Colorado Medical School, testified that “the beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matterthe beginning is conception. This straightforward biological fact should not be distorted to serve sociological, political or economic goals.”
Dr. Alfred Bongiovanni of the University of Pennsylvania Medical School noted: “The standard medical texts have long taught that human life begins at conception.”
He added: “I am no more prepared to say that these early stages represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty... is not a human being. This is human life at every stage albeit incomplete until late adolescence.”
Dr. McCarthy De Mere, who is a practicing physician as well as a law professor at the University of Tennessee, testified: “The exact moment of the beginning [of] personhood and of the human body is at the moment of conception.”
World-famous geneticist Dr. Jerome Lejeune, professor of fundamental genetics at the University of Descarte, Paris, France, declared, “each individual has a very unique beginning, the moment of its conception.”
Dr. Lejeune also emphasized: “The human nature of the human being from conception to old age is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence.”
The chairman of the Department of Medical Genetics at the Mayo Clinic, Professor Hymie Gordon, testified, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”
He further emphasized: “now we can say, unequivocally, that the question of when life begins is an established scientific fact . It is an established fact that all life, including human life, begins at the moment of conception.”
This Senate report concluded:
Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human beinga being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.
In 1981, only a single scientist disagreed with the majoritys conclusion, and he did so on philosophical rather than scientific grounds. In fact, abortion advocates, although invited to do so, failed to produce even one expert witness who would specifically testify that life begins at any other point than conception.
"Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me!"
http://cpforlife.org/culture_of_life.htm
I’ve been posting excerpts from this to the Denver media outlets
in response to all the ugly opposition to our Personhood Amendment
on the ballot for this upcoming election.
Creator-endowed right to life and liberty is the foundation upon which this nation was founded.
If a nation devalues that concept, basing an individual's right to life and liberty on judicial fiat and a woman or girl's decision, then where is the security for liberty for any?
The elephant in the room in this election is the Radical Left's absolute determination that it, alone, will decide who sits on the Supreme Court of the United States! They talk about "change," they talk about war, they talk about everything else, but the "elephant" is the question of the unfettered right of a woman to destroy her unborn child. To the Left, this is a declared war on all opposition.
Yes, it is time for John McCain to take off the gloves on exposing the real culprits in the government who forced banks to make risky loans to unqualified people, but for the sake of liberty for generations yet unborn, it is far more important that he clarify the importance of the life issue, and the threat to liberty if Obama carries out the Left's agenda. Soft pedaling this issue, as if it is just a personal preference, overlooks a far more significant principle.
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."- Thomas Jefferson
"The world is different now. . . . And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God."- JFK, Inaugural 1961
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.