Skip to comments.
Kucinich On Bailout: "I'm not just gonna vote no, I'm gonna vote hell no!"
Fox News ^
| 9/28/08
| Fox News
Posted on 09/28/2008 1:53:34 PM PDT by careyb
Anyone else see Kucinich on Fox News? He's RAILING against the bailout? Some of his complaints involved typical bashing of "trickle-down" concepts but some of them actually made a lot of sense.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bailout; kucinich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Can’t believe it, I agree with the nut from Ohio, too.
All Nancy and her pals have to do is assure China that we won’t renege on our nation’s loans. Good luck with that, ladies.
No wonder they all have their panties in a wad. How did we get here anyway!?
21
posted on
09/28/2008 2:03:38 PM PDT
by
madison10
(Pray for the brave Republicans in Congress...)
To: careyb
Yep, Kucinich got it right. Go Dennis!
22
posted on
09/28/2008 2:04:47 PM PDT
by
Jane Austen
(Boycott the Bahamas!)
To: careyb
All the finance lefties I have read are against it. Guess just the “moderates” are for it.
23
posted on
09/28/2008 2:05:03 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
To: Terry Mross
Sorry, I wasn’t clear. It was Kucinich who said he didn’t come to DC to sit on Goldman’s board. Doubt he’s looking for a job in the Bush administration :)
24
posted on
09/28/2008 2:06:10 PM PDT
by
javachip
To: careyb
Heck, even a blind squirrel can find an acorn once in a while.
25
posted on
09/28/2008 2:06:26 PM PDT
by
KStorm
(MP08)
To: careyb
Looks like Kucinich is the real Maverick in this deal
26
posted on
09/28/2008 2:06:46 PM PDT
by
dragonblustar
(Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
To: careyb
Now I definitely know I have slipped into an alternate universe...
27
posted on
09/28/2008 2:07:37 PM PDT
by
Left2Right
("It's going to be a long eight years...maybe not!")
To: cripplecreek
This explains why the Dems haven’t just rammed the bill through and need to get Republican support - they don’t have enough support in their own party to do it alone.
28
posted on
09/28/2008 2:07:43 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; Roy Tucker; GOPJ; dervish; ...
The Money, Banking, and Financial Markets Ping List.
FR Keyword: moneylist
This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
To join, send Freepmail to rabscuttle385.
29
posted on
09/28/2008 2:08:19 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(No to bailouts, no to amnesty, no to carbon credits, no to Big Government!)
To: careyb
So Democrats and Republicans are against this bill but the Senates only formal socialist is AGAINST it?
That's correct. Politics does make for strange bedfellows. Naturally, Sanders and Kucinich arrive at their opposition from a different perspective, but their position on this monstrosity is correct, regardless.
Check out: http://sanders.senate.gov/
I think he's voting against it, no matter what it looks like.
To: Thane_Banquo
Please see # 18 ... has the SEC been messing up? Or- was this just a talking point for Kucinich?
Struggling to understand..still.
31
posted on
09/28/2008 2:08:41 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: careyb
1. Kinda scary day in American history when Kucinich seems to be the voice of reason. Very. But if you are right you are right even if you are the evil elf the rest of the time.
32
posted on
09/28/2008 2:10:19 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Just say No to Lawyers! Palin '08! (oh and McWhatshisname too. I guess))
To: dragonblustar
Looks like Kucinich is the real Maverick in this deal Sad, but so very true.
33
posted on
09/28/2008 2:13:25 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
To: careyb
I’m suspicious of Kookcinich’s motives. Is he complaining that his pie was cut out or he didn’t get any pie and wants some?
To: Harry Wurzbach
35
posted on
09/28/2008 2:15:55 PM PDT
by
Jane Austen
(Boycott the Bahamas!)
To: SE Mom
One thing for sure, that the SEC dropped the ball on is EVER acknowledging or doing anything about naked short selling. They constantly ignored it and denied it was happening when, in fact it was. Big time.
I do blame Cox for that.
To: SE Mom
does anyone here know IF the SEC in fact has been lax in enforcing the rules and regs?This is what I've found: we have been over regulating sectors that don't need the regulation, and we've deregulated sectors that desperately need regulation.
To: spacejunkie01; Fox_Mulder77
Ok- thanks. I was under the impression that naked shorts was a big problem. So- if it was going on- is that practice covered under regulation..and just..ignored, kept hidden?
38
posted on
09/28/2008 2:25:19 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: SE Mom
It’s illegal but still going on and no one was doing anything about it. IMO, Cox took a very lax approach to it and ignored any talk that it was going on. Alot of naked shorting was being done out of the Europe and the ME.
To: spacejunkie01
ahhhhhh...ok, thanks for the information.
Reid and Pelosi are up now doing live press conf- two more detestable “public servants” cannot be found.
40
posted on
09/28/2008 2:38:16 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson