Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS News Wrong Again (Cindy McCain's dress)
cbsnews ^ | 9/24/08 | self

Posted on 09/24/2008 1:53:18 PM PDT by onlylewis

Vanity Fair editors estimated that McCain's fierce saffron shirt dress with the popped collar, diamond earrings, four-strand pearl necklace, white Chanel watch and strappy shoes totaled up to $313,100. _______________________________________________________

I say do not watse your time reading the lie at the link just provided for verification of the original lie.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; cindymccain; costumejewelry; dnctalkingpoints; dress; fakebutaccurate; greed; jewelry; mccainpalin; seebsnews; waronerror; zogbyism
The cost of a dress and accessories is not the topic of my thoughts with this post. The topic I wish to approach is the inability of these news organizations to make wrongs right. I know that they will not but I just wish to give this example.

Today I was in a surgery center with my wife between 9:30 and 10:00 ET. One of the obama supporters playing a part of a reporter came on quickly (maybe five seconds)and gave a retraction of the above-mentioned lie. They acknowledged that Mrs. McCain's dress was off the rack and that the pearls were not real. In other words it did not cost the $300,000 they reported and reported over and over again. I just searched their site to see if I could find a printed retraction and of course I could not. I'm sure we will never see that printed retraction. Has anyone else heard or seen anything on this?

1 posted on 09/24/2008 1:53:18 PM PDT by onlylewis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: onlylewis
Cindy McCain is a wealthy woman - what she should shop at WalMart?
I do not care how much her outfit costs or not.
2 posted on 09/24/2008 1:55:30 PM PDT by svcw (Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

They should concentrate on all the GOOD things this woman has done over the years & continues to do. She really is an amazing woman.


3 posted on 09/24/2008 1:57:08 PM PDT by FES0844 (FES0844)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

Michelle O has a few favorite designers making her dresses.
Wonders how much they cost?


4 posted on 09/24/2008 1:58:18 PM PDT by donnab (some people use change to promote their careers...others use their careers to promote change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

Unless I am paying for it, this is of no concern for me. If you can afford to dress to the nines, feel free to do so.


5 posted on 09/24/2008 1:59:05 PM PDT by Clemenza (PRIVATIZE FANNIE AND FREDDIE! NO MORE BAILOUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

I’m so glad CBS News is reporting on this significant information and not wasting time with trivialities like how Obama funded his way through Harvard. I can sleep soundly tonight.


6 posted on 09/24/2008 1:59:56 PM PDT by 6SJ7 (Welcome PUMAs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

True conservative reaction to a report of someone spending $300K on an outfit (or anything else) - GOOD! Look how many jobs that just created!


7 posted on 09/24/2008 2:00:35 PM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Who are you going to believe, the trusted MSM polls or your lying eyes? ~ Mr. Lucky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donnab

If designers are making her dresses, my humble opinion is that she should fire said designers.


8 posted on 09/24/2008 2:02:56 PM PDT by mom-7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

Guess they have hired Jayson Blair as their consultant.

Or Dan Rather is still roaming the halls.


9 posted on 09/24/2008 2:06:34 PM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

True conservative reaction to a report of someone spending $300K on an outfit (or anything else) - GOOD! Look how many jobs that just created!
::::::::::::::::
1) Created jobs where?
2) If one earned the money, buy and dress as one chooses!


10 posted on 09/24/2008 2:06:48 PM PDT by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I am going to ask my best friend. Her mom does seamstress work for Cindy. She would know.


11 posted on 09/24/2008 2:16:43 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

name dropperrrrrrrrr


12 posted on 09/24/2008 2:42:47 PM PDT by GulfBreeze (McCain/Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

The ain’t called “drive by media” by Rush for no reason.


13 posted on 09/24/2008 2:45:35 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket
Look how many jobs that just created!

You don't create enduring jobs that grow the economy when you spend your money on consumables. You create jobs and grow the economy when you invest in the means of production and hire folks to produce goods and services. Then, they earn income which they can spend on purchasing goods produced by someone else's investments in growth and the investors all gain by having a right to a fraction of the total production stream that is created.

Republicans keep forgetting that private wealth only leads to increased production if it is spent in ways that result in investment in increasing production.

You have the right to spend private wealth how you choose. Whether it is productive or merely consumptive depends upo n what you spend it on.

14 posted on 09/24/2008 3:12:03 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

So at about $900 and ounce, how much did Michelle pay for her "Mr.T Starter Kit?"
15 posted on 09/24/2008 3:31:39 PM PDT by Bommer (Who was Obama's diction coach? Bevis or Butthead? Uhhhhhh.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

LOL!!

I just got off the phone with my friend and asked her about Cindy’s clothes and she says no way do those outfits cost 200,000-300,000 each!!


16 posted on 09/24/2008 4:48:42 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: onlylewis

Maybe I can get her seamstress to appear on Fox News Channel????? I will have to ask her if she would appear on tv and then send an email to FNC.


17 posted on 09/24/2008 4:50:03 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
It depends on the weight and the karat. There is *gold* jewelry out there that barely registers when you hold it in your hand. The Chinese are masters at taking the tiniest amount of gold and spinning it out to equal the look of much more at higher gold contents.

Always hold a piece of gold jewelry in your hand to get an idea of its weight before buying. If you hold the Chinese piece in one hand and (for example) an Italian piece in the other, even if they look identical, you will be amazed at the difference.

Also, don't waste your money on anything under 18kt. It is not true that 24kt gold is too soft to work, either. Our wedding rings came from a 24kt Javanese money ring, alloyed just slightly to get to the correct mass and after 34 years are exactly as they were when made.

Michelle most likely buys by price and store brand. If it is even real or not plated. A lot of women with really fine jewelry collections have faux pieces they wear in public, saving the fine items for venues with security. It can be nerve-wracking to wear expensive items in crowded public places. Probably why Cindy's pearls were faux.

18 posted on 09/24/2008 4:59:16 PM PDT by reformedliberal (God bless Saracuda America, speaking truth to power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: loungitude; AndyJackson

Ah well, perhaps “created” was a poor word choice. “Supported” might have been a better fit. I would agree that consumerism does not, in and of itself, create jobs, however, without consumers you can invest in the means of production to your heart’s content, but it will not be sustainable.


19 posted on 09/25/2008 5:44:21 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Who are you going to believe, the trusted MSM polls or your lying eyes? ~ Mr. Lucky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson