Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama vows cuts to contractor spending
washingtontechnology.com ^ | 22 September 2008 | WashingtonTechnology

Posted on 09/24/2008 7:18:30 AM PDT by COBOL2Java

Presidential candidate Barack Obama told a Wisconsin audience today that he will slash federal spending on contractors by 10 percent, the Associated Press reported.

The cuts are part of his plan to revive an economy battered by turmoil on Wall Street and the housing market.

Obama was speaking in Green Bay, Wis. He said the $700 billion bailout plan proposed by President Bush and Congress is forcing a new look at federal spending.

"The only way we can do all this without leaving our children with an even larger debt is if Washington starts taking responsibility for every dime that it spends," Obama said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontechnology.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; democrats; economicpolicy; elections; nobama08; obama; obamabiden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last

1 posted on 09/24/2008 7:18:31 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Suuuuuuuuuure he will..........


2 posted on 09/24/2008 7:19:40 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Barry will cut the contractors and then hire them as full time government employees, thus increasing the size of the fed.


3 posted on 09/24/2008 7:20:36 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Okay, Obambi, let’s see you start “taking responsibility” for over $1 million in earmarks for your buddies and friends.


4 posted on 09/24/2008 7:21:39 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Yeah, right. Democrats only lie when their mouths are moving.


5 posted on 09/24/2008 7:23:13 AM PDT by popdonnelly (I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal
Obama is a snake in the grass.

President Bush increased the number of Gov't contractors in an attempt to get people off Federal payrolls.

Obama wants them back on because he can see where Bush's plan is heading long term.

He's a Commie through and through.

6 posted on 09/24/2008 7:23:58 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

What contractors? I couldn’t find out if he meant defense contractors (a typical democrat scapegoat) or perhaps the contractors who built the bridge that collapsed on I-35 (yes, let’s force them to cut corners even more so more bridges will collapse twenty years after Obama’s tenure in office).

I guess community organizers are worth every penny they get, but contractors are lazy, bitter, political hacks who don’t really contribute anything.

Unbelievable. A simplistic, across-the-board approach to waste like a ten percent cut. Typical of a idealist who has never never had a real job or had to make a payroll or build anything worthwhile. The guy sounds like Chairman Mao.


7 posted on 09/24/2008 7:24:23 AM PDT by mywholebodyisaweapon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

This is where Obama’s “army” comes into play.


8 posted on 09/24/2008 7:24:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mywholebodyisaweapon
What contractors?

That was my question. Obama has a very difficult time getting specific about anything, and when he does, he contradicts himself all over the place.

9 posted on 09/24/2008 7:27:04 AM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
He probably will slash spending on contractors -- DEFENSE contractors thereby leaving us more vulnerable as a nation.

In general, government contractors do much of the work that federal employees should be doing but don't or won't.

10 posted on 09/24/2008 7:27:16 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java; All

He must be in trouble if he is saying stuff like this...


11 posted on 09/24/2008 7:27:45 AM PDT by KevinDavis (McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver
full time government employees

More precisely, full time government union employees. With Democrats, its always about doing what is in their best interests and government employees unions are an adjunct of the Democrat Party.

12 posted on 09/24/2008 7:28:27 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mywholebodyisaweapon
Typical of a idealist who has never never had a real job or had to make a payroll or build anything worthwhile.

He is the proverbial empty suit. All talk, no show. Never really produced or accomplished anything.

13 posted on 09/24/2008 7:30:23 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Presidential candidate Barack Obama told a Wisconsin audience today that he will slash federal spending on contractors by 10 percent, the Associated Press reported.
Having experience as a contractor on numerous gubmint construction projects I say ... Bullsh*t, Barry.

There's a reason that infamous 'gubmint purchased Hammer' costs $700.00, 'my friends'.

14 posted on 09/24/2008 7:33:03 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
In general, government contractors do much of the work that federal employees should be doing but don't or won't.

Exactly. I was a contractor to the EPA. The OSCs (fed employees) did squat; I never even saw one suit up. And then they bitched about their $60k salaries which were twice what we were paid.

15 posted on 09/24/2008 7:38:24 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Let’s see, now. This $700 BILLION works out as $2,300 or so for every man, woman, and child in these United States. This is immediate additional debt. So if this debt were divided up, and each person were to be given the proceeds of the repayment of the loan created by the debt incurred, then EVERYBODY would have a direct interest in how well the economy was managed. This assignment could not be traded away, but it could be passed on to heirs, according to existing law concerning inheritances. It would be repaid into an individual’s account, and NOT to the individual themselves, placed in an ASSIGNED account, and treated as a non-taxable asset. This asset would grow with the repayment of the debt, and eventually could be more than the original amount of the dollar figure at the beginning.

Naturally, this could NEVER be a fund to which the US Treasury would be custodian, nor could Congress EVER be able to lay claim to it, or use it as collateral to fund further schemes of any kind.

It would be an excellent basis for creating a retirement account for everybody, NOT tied to Social Security.

I still want Chris Dodd and Barney Frank frog-marched out of Congress and slapped with criminal indictments, with a potential penalty of life in prison.


16 posted on 09/24/2008 7:38:43 AM PDT by alloysteel (Just because you are a target, does not mean you have to be a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

This is to increase union membership not to save money. With benefits it will cost more money.


17 posted on 09/24/2008 7:45:36 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

“More precisely, full time government union employees.”

You are right!


18 posted on 09/24/2008 7:48:51 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal

Obambi needs to take responsibility for “HIS” $740 Million in earmarks $1 million of which went to Michelle’s employer!


19 posted on 09/24/2008 8:04:17 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doodad
And then they bitched about their $60k salaries which were twice what we were paid.

That must have been some time ago. Current DC area salary for a mid-range GS-12 is $80,000. However, GS 13 (avg $95K) and GS 14 (avg $111K) grades are more typical. You can go to opm.gov and check the 2008 salary tables for your particular area, but they're all high.

20 posted on 09/24/2008 8:07:58 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson