Posted on 09/21/2008 5:27:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
I cannot see how any honest democrat can question Plain after supporting Kerry-Edwards in 2004.
bookmark for later read.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
And that, of course, explains the legions of liberals currently drowning in gallons of their own vitriol: "Congrats, Dems, the smears and sneers are working in Palin's favor"
We all know that gender and race plays a part in the way some folks will vote. OK - fine
I speak for myself in saying it makes no difference to me what color or gender, race or religion is involved here.
On qualities of candidates, McCain/Palin are vastly superior to the alternative.
And I must be a mind-numb robot or simply stupid cause 48% some odd percent think differently.
Someone tell me how such a large percentage of good folks will actively support a fraud, rooted in Marxism, schooled in anacacism, and settled in socialism.
And the opponents are a certifiable war hero and a self-made stand alone female competent conservative activist.
I just can’t get my brain around this disconnect.
thanks....
VPs in Democrat administrations are normally shuffled off to obscurity.
VPs in Republican administrations notmally play a significant part in the administration of the country. Cheney is probably the best example.
I think that our modern mass communications coverage, brings the VP position to it’s current forefront, which just did not exist in the past. There simply was not the need for, the time for, nor the money to make the VP position very prominent...besides, it has really helped McCain.
How about comparing her experience and qualifications to a few people who have been elected PRESIDENT, not VP.
* Franklin Roosevelt - first term Governor, cabinet appointee (Asst Sec of Navy), 1 term State Senator.
* Woodrow Wilson - first term governor (served 2 years total), college President.
* Grover Cleveland - first term Governor (served 2 years total)
This entire issue is a red herring. A farce. And why?
Two reasons:
1) Because the Dem/MSM smear machine was not prepared in advance with their standard meal of anger and hate mongering to dish out to the sheeple, and had to do their "homework" in full public view.
2) Her choice will be the difference in gaining victory for McCain, and they know it.
This is not a complicated story...
I noticed in the interview with Hannity that Palin managed to bring in John McCain's name to many of the questions and I knew then that she doesn't see this election as all about her. It added a lot to her stature for me.
The author seems to ignore the fact that Palin is the first female VP ever nominated by the Rep party. It is historic and won’t be forgotten, win or lose.
1) Regional or ideological appeal for the election.
2) Attack dog, ideological spokesman for the party.
3) Presumed front-runner in next open POTUS nomination.
4) Pet project or organizational role in the administration.
5) Vote tiebreaker in the Senate. Serve in case of President's death or removal from office.
Even VPOTUS Dick Cheney was only a 4/5, being taken on as a mentor rather than successor by POTUS G.W. Bush. Sarah Palin is 5/5.
1) She shored up the base
2) She serves up red meat nice and hot for the partisans, got Obambi off his game, and had McCain going “tut tut” above the fray.
3) When she runs in 2012 or 2016 it will be amazing; THIS is why the base loves her,not for what she will do as VPOTUS, but what her being given the nod means in the future.
4) Disabled children is a good pet cause, and the woman is a dynamo, considering the concern she raised (wth does the VP do?) I imagine McCain has a role mapped out for her in his administration.
5) Might be a tie Senate, I trust Palin’s vote more than any sitting Senator. If she had to serve she would run as an incumbent in 2012 or 2016 and John McCain would leave with a smile knowing he had once again done his duty and served us well.
She is the real deal people (singing to the choir).
Years ago there was an obituary about a prominent man. Part of said, “He had two sons. One went to sea and one became the Vice President of the U.S. Neither was ever heard from again.”
I think we’ll hear a lot of Gov. Palin, VP or not.
anacacism
Never heard of this word.
I cannot see how any honest democrat can question Plain after supporting Kerry-Edwards in 2004.
I would argue that no job in politics more ill prepares a person to be president or vp than that of senator (the argumentative branch of government).
Senator is probably the second worst prepatory position, the first being, "Community Organizer."
Or, as Rush refers to it, street agitator.
He trusted and expected his foot soldiers to defend him and his administration and it is them that have let him not the other way round.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.