Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charles Gibson is a smug elitist prick
September 13, 2008

Posted on 09/13/2008 10:05:19 AM PDT by EveningStar

I believe in hard hitting interviews. With that in mind, I decided to watch the Charles Gibson interview of Sarah Palin last night on 20/20.

What I saw was not a hard hitting interview. It was an adversarial attack. Charles Gibson was not acting as an interviewer. He was acting as a prosecutor examining what he thought was a hostile witness.

He was playing gotcha, just as Dennis Prager said he had done. He was a smug supercilious elitist.

If you want an example of hard hitting but above the belt interviewing you can look to Chris Wallace and the late Tim Russert. Gibson is not in their class. In fact, he has no class.

I'm sure he impressed his fellow leftist elitists as well as John Q. and Joan Q. Gullible-Ignoramus. But I hope that plenty of people saw through this travesty.

I should have known better better after listening to Dennis Prager yesterday, but like a glutton for punishment, I decided to give Gibson a chance.

By the way, I turned off the TV before the half-way point of the show. I didn't want to have a stroke.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abcnews; charlesgibson; charliegibson; chucklestheclown; dncmediamachine; mediabias; sarahpalin; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: EveningStar

Gibson has always been a liberal, but with this episode he joined the ranks of Dan Rather as a discredited partisan. Too bad for him.

On the bright side, this was the best thing that could happen for the McCain campaign. Just as Obama has to go hard negative to try to catch up, the media is going to be shamed following Palin’s excellent navigation of the ABC booby trap.

Perhaps the pubblies will get a little bit of a break going foward (I don’t expect the media to help them but maybe they will just reduce their antagonism).


41 posted on 09/13/2008 12:08:09 PM PDT by Thickman (Term limits are the answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewer1516; EveningStar

huh, wat?
oh...guess the brewer missed the first post


42 posted on 09/13/2008 12:35:26 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: brewer1516

In the original title, elitist was an adjective which preceded a noun. The mod wisely removed the noun from the title. :)


43 posted on 09/13/2008 1:15:12 PM PDT by EveningStar (McCain-Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

>>I heard NPR regurgitating the exact same talking points as all other MSM outlets this morning.<<

I heard the leftist version of the “Bush Doctrine” question on NPR 2 programs and shot off an email which said that they are either (which may be indeed the case with Charlie Gibson) ignorant or biased.


44 posted on 09/13/2008 2:19:55 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson