Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

He can’t win. He won’t win. It is over
The Collins Report ^ | September 11, 2008 | Kevin "Coach" Collins

Posted on 09/11/2008 5:55:32 AM PDT by jmaroneps37

Since February I have been saying that Barack Obama would get crushed in this year’s presidential election. … The signs of trouble for the Democrats have always been there…

….Today it is no longer “wishful thinking” or “proof you have been smoking something” to say John McCain will crush Barack Obama.

..here are the numbers that say it is over..

To win Obama must get these numbers with these groups:

..women, he needs at least plus 7. He is down 12.

White males needs at least 36%. If he gets 30% he will be lucky

Catholics: needs 50%. He is down 59/36.

Evangelicals: needs 71%. He is running against an Evangelical and has nothing to offer these Christian voters.

Jewish vote: needs 80%. He is at 57%.

Black vote: needs 95%. Zogby says he has “lost support” among Black voters.

Hispanic vote: needs 65%. The only polls available show he is at 65% so that won’t help, it will only slow the bleeding.

Democrat base support: needs 92%. He is at 86%.

Independents: needs 49%. He is losing 52/37.

This one is over. On Monday September 29, 2008 at about 5 PM when the last weekend polls come in, the numbers will spell doom for the Democrats. On September 30, 2008 the McCain Palin campaign must plan on switching gears and start asking for votes to give them a Republican Congress. It could keep the margin down and keep us safe from the Democrats for another two years.

..there will only be four elected Democrats who will be happy on Nov. 5, the Clintons, George McGovern and Walter Mondale because Barack Obama will take them off the hook as having taken the worse beatings in history


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: byjmaroneps37; electionpresident; jmaroneps37; mccainpalin; mcgovern; mondale; obama; obamabiden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 next last
To: kabar

There’s a big difference in having to literally go out into the streets—or cemetarys—and drag in anyone who can somehow get into the voting booth and pull a lever. Of course, there is a 50% chance—remember Florida—they’ll pull the wrong lever or punch the wrong chad. There is no doubt dem fraud will be rampant in this election. However, pubbies are energized and in the main can navigate the ballot. Every time the dems cast aspersions on Palin’s family they encourage a pubbie to vote who might have been leaning toward not voting or voting for any conservative candidate. I was one of those. Now I will vote McCain/Palin.


141 posted on 09/11/2008 7:47:31 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I was not aware that the Elecotral College gave votes to “Catholics”, “Evangelicals”, “Jews”, “Blacks”, etc. I thought it went by states.

No, you are referring to the constitutional system designed by rich white men a couple hundred years ago. Most judges and congressman agree that this system was much too defined and did not factor in things such as feelings and emotions.


142 posted on 09/11/2008 7:48:14 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

If you can’t trust a poll (and you usually can’t), why can you trust the “internals” of that same poll?


143 posted on 09/11/2008 7:53:12 AM PDT by Burma Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dools007
There is no doubt we are going to witness the highest black turnout ever, which will have an effect on some red states like VA that has a 20% black population. The Dems set records in the primaries for turnout with numbers more than two to three times the Reps in many states. There is no question that the Dem base is energized and organized.

Palin has helped immensely with the Rep turnout and particiapation. McCain became the presumptive nominee with just 31% of the vote. He was going to depress the turnout of the base. And then there are the Hillary voters and the "Bradley effect" that could play a major role in the race. It is going to be very close.

144 posted on 09/11/2008 7:56:23 AM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

>>Do not misunderestimate the depths to which the backers of these people will stoop to secure the White House of the the United States of America.<<

They are hoping that the army of slime miners they sent to Alaska will dig up something that sticks, and save it until just before the election....


145 posted on 09/11/2008 7:57:32 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
You think blacks will vote for him solely because he’s black, regardless of his lack of experience. Right?

Yes I do.

I see a twist on that: Blacks will vote for him because they will be coerced with peer pressure and fear of social fallout if they resist, just as many in university environments or teachers’ unions are pressured.

Absolutely right.

That being said, a few brave souls will close the curtain and do the right thing for America.

I'm sure this is true, but it won't be 10-12% of the Black vote. I think it will be more like 2-3%.

146 posted on 09/11/2008 7:58:15 AM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: AMiller
"Hillary will probably be majority leader but the Senate president sets the agenda."

Hillary, Senate Majority Leader???? Color me skeptical. Seniority means a lot in the Senate heirarchy, and she has little.

147 posted on 09/11/2008 8:01:00 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Especially the media.


148 posted on 09/11/2008 8:02:34 AM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

It does not matter, black, white, hispanic...IT IS ALL about the Electoral College and the numbers there.


149 posted on 09/11/2008 8:02:59 AM PDT by Ceoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

So thats how they do it, huh? I remember in 04 they were having technical difficulties in Wisconson and stopped the count till the next morning. Bush was very close to winning. I thought he would take Wisconson. We didn’t hear anymore about it for awhile and then FoxNews called Ohio for Bush and sure enough the next morning, Wisconson went to Kerry. So they were manufacturing votes. This is only going to get worse till Republicans start fighting vote fraud.


150 posted on 09/11/2008 8:08:17 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“The internals are instructive and so is Obama’s conduct on the campaign trail.”

Exactly...
Stephanopolous let it slip BEFORE the conventions that Dem internals were showing bad things for Obama, and the orgy of hate and lies since Palin was nominated tells us EXACTLY what they are seeing now.


151 posted on 09/11/2008 8:09:03 AM PDT by tcrlaf (SARAH PALIN-The American Everywoman (Yes, You Really CAN!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If you think the polls show the election as close, it doesn't explain Barry's bizzarely self destructive behavior. If he really thought he had a chance, he wouldn't be acting the way he does.

I'll believe that the election is McCain's when California polls show him over Obama in that state. Until then, it's work, work, work. McCain won't win over many Blacks but I think he has a chance with Hispanics. If it turns out he does win without their help, he needs to rethink his amnesty proposals; no need for him to pander.

152 posted on 09/11/2008 8:09:38 AM PDT by CedarDave (Sign at Albuquerque rally: "Sarah, you had us at 'Hello'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

The people in flyover country do see through him but its the metropolitan areas that vote dem big time.


153 posted on 09/11/2008 8:14:28 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: normy
My brothers coworker who is black saw 0bama on TV and said "so what now, is he gonna sh!t rainbows".

LOL I love that!

154 posted on 09/11/2008 8:24:30 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One
"I'm seeing this a couple of times in this thread. Please know that the Majority Leader, not the VP, decides what legislation comes to the floor and when. VP's role is limited to tie-breaker votes."

Semper Fi brother...

Yes, I agree with you about the job of who brings legislation to the floor. When I said she will spearhead energy legislation I was not talking about her actually bringing legislation to the floor. More like the role that Hillary Clinton played while trying to get socialized healthcare in 1993. She did not bring the legislation forward in Congress, but she was clearly spearheading it.
155 posted on 09/11/2008 8:28:38 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I have to ask how you got to see internal polling data. Was it McCain data? Was it from each of the states? I won’t be surprised if you are connected in some way, with a name like goldstategop, but I sure would like to see what you saw.

Did you give more details elsewhere on FR?


156 posted on 09/11/2008 8:36:33 AM PDT by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ceoman
IT IS ALL about the Electoral College and the numbers there.

That's why it's going to go down to CO., NM., and NV. I would be surprised if McCain/Palin win NM. I think they will win NV., so it will be CO. that decides it.

The idea that McCain/Palin will take PA., MI., and NH. sounds great, but I don't believe it is likely. If they get PA., or MI. we don't even have to worry about the west.

157 posted on 09/11/2008 8:40:07 AM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Totally agree,, landslide of historic proportions. BUT DO NOT stop working. Tortoise and Hare. Rabbit would have won, but his arrogance screwed him. Focus on our task. However, fight with a glad heart knowing we CAN win big.

That said, this democrat effort is nothing less than a islamo/marxist America-hating insurgency funded by Soros. Soros was big into those “color revolutions” in the former USSR.

They will do anything to win. Fraud of all kinds, litigation we cannot conceive of, AND i am always worried about the day they declare the color blue or something as the color of revolt and start the sit down strikes.

44% of the nation will almost certainly vote for him.
Post defeat, they could mobilize utterly immense crowds doing the “national shutdown” routine. The MSM would spin this to the world as a stolen election, a popular uprising, Jimmy Carter swings into action,,the UN convenes in emergency session,,, the EU immediately “recognizes” Obama as the winner,,,, etc. Financial Markets go into absolute chaos, the monied interests worldwide are screaming,,,, the pressure on the US supreme court, and the electors in congress would be unbearable.
(i should write a scary political novel,,,,no?)

From Marcos vs Aquinno,,,Ukraine,, Georgia,, etc,,we have encouraged electoral losers to flood the streets until they bring down the government in question. People, the day is coming where they will try it here. In truth, revolutionary change, not constitutional, is their goal.
Absolutely do not underestimate their treachery. They might not just go home they way we would if we lost a fair election.

I hope im wrong,,, but his core feels very dangerous to me. Anyway,,, buy some tuna and extra ammo. I’m heading into my rhetorical bunker now, fire away if you disagree!


158 posted on 09/11/2008 9:04:51 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", what title has islam earned from us?,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeusLeVeult; goldstategop
Originally posted by DeusLeVeult:
"If someone wins 54% of popular vote, I don’t think there is any way he can lose the EV."


So far, historically, that is correct. The 'popular' vote winner with the highest percentage popular vote who lost the actual Electoral College vote was Tilden(D) in 1876 who had 50.97% of the 'popular' vote while receiving 49.9% of the electoral vote. The victor, Hayes(R) had 47.95% of the 'popular' vote and 50.1% of the electoral vote.

Here is a table with the rest of the Presidential election vote percentages, sorted by the 'popular' vote margin of the electoral college winner.


Presidential Elections
1789-2004


                             
"Popular" Vote       Winning Percentage   Losing Percentage       Other(s) Total Percentage  
Victory Margin Year Party Winner Electoral Vote "Popular" Vote   Electoral Vote "Popular" Vote Loser Party   Electoral Vote "Popular" Vote Others
No Popular Vote 1796 Federalist Adams(2) 51.40% n/a   49.30% n/a Jefferson(3) Dem-Reps   99.30% n/a Pinckney,Burr,S.Adams,Ellsworth,G.Clinton,etc
No Popular Vote 1800 Dem-Reps Jefferson 52.90% n/a   52.90% n/a Burr Dem-Reps   94.20% n/a Adams(2),Pinckney,Jay
No Popular Vote 1812 Dem-Reps Madison 58.70% n/a   40.80% n/a D.Clinton Federalist   0.50% n/a Non-voting elector
No Popular Vote 1808 Dem-Reps Madison 69.30% n/a   26.70% n/a Pinckney Federalist   4.00% n/a G.Clinton,etc.
No Popular Vote 1816 Dem-Reps Monroe 82.80% n/a   15.40% n/a King Federalist   1.80% n/a Non-voting elector
No Popular Vote 1789 No Party Washington 85.20% n/a   42.00% n/a Adams(2) No Party   72.80% n/a Jay,Harrison,Rutledge, etc
No Popular Vote 1804 Dem-Reps Jefferson 92.00% n/a   8.00% n/a Pinckney Federalist   0.00% n/a Election under 12th Amendment
No Popular Vote 1792 No Party Washington 97.80% n/a   57.00% n/a Adams(2) No Party   45.20% n/a G.Clinton,Jefferson,Burr,etc
No Popular Vote 1820 Dem-Reps Monroe 98.30% n/a   0.00% n/a NONE NONE   1.70% n/a One "faithless" elector for JQ.Adams who was not running, three non-voting electors
26.17% 1920 Republican Harding 76.08% 60.32%   23.92% 34.15% Cox Democrat   0.00% 5.53% Debs,Christiansen,Watkins,Ferguson,W.Cox,No One,Macauley,Write-ins
25.22% 1924 Republican Coolidge 71.94% 54.04%   25.61% 28.82% Davis Democrat   2.45% 17.14% LaFollette,Faris,Foster,Johns,Nations,Write-ins,Wallace
24.25% 1936 Democrat Roosevelt(32) 98.49% 60.80%   1.51% 36.55% Landon Republican   0.00% 2.65% Lemke,Thomas,Browder,Colvin,Aiken,Pelley,Write-ins
23.15% 1972 Republican Nixon 96.65% 60.67%   3.16% 37.52% McGovern Democrat   0.19% 1.81% Hospers,Schmitz,Jenness,Spock,Fisher,Write-ins,Hall,Reed,Munn,Mahalchik,Green
22.58% 1964 Democrat Johnson(36) 90.33% 61.05%   9.67% 38.47% Goldwater Republican   0.00% 0.48% Unpledged,Hass,DeBerry,Munn,Write-ins,Kasper,Lightburn,Hensley
21.72% 1860 Republican Lincoln 59.40% 39.82%   23.80% 18.10% Breckenridge S.Democrat (D)   16.80% 42.08% Bell,Douglas,Other
18.83% 1904 Republican Roosevelt(26) 70.59% 56.42%   29.41% 37.59% Parker Democrat   0.00% 5.99% Debs,Swallow,Watson,Corregan,Holcomb,Write-ins
18.21% 1984 Republican Reagan 97.58% 58.77%   2.42% 40.56% Mondale Democrat   0.00% 0.67% Bergland,Larouche,Johnson,Richards,Serrette,Hall,Mason,Holmes,Write-in, Dennis,Winn,Dodge,No candidate,Anderson,Baker,Lowery
17.76% 1932 Democrat Roosevelt(32) 88.89% 57.41%   11.11% 39.65% Hoover(31) Republican   0.00% 2.94% Thomas,Foster,Upshaw,Harvey,Reynolds,Coxey,Write-ins,Zahnd,J.Cox,No one
17.41% 1928 Republican Hoover 83.62% 58.21%   16.38% 40.80% Smith Democrat   0.00% 0.99% Thomas,Foster,Reynolds,Varney,Webb,Write-ins
16.81% 1832 Democrat Jackson 76.00% 54.23%   17.00% 37.42% Clay Nat-Reps   7.00% 8.35% Floyd,Wirt,Non-Voting,Other
15.40% 1956 Republican Eisenhower 86.06% 57.37%   13.75% 41.97% Stevenson Democrat   0.19% 0.66% Unpledged,Andrews,Hass,Holtwick,Write-ins,Dobbs,Byrd,Hoopes,Krajewski,G.Smith,Other
14.44% 1912 Democrat Wilson 81.92% 41.84%   16.57% 27.40% Roosevelt(26) Progressive (R)   1.51% 30.76% Taft(27),Debs,Chafin,Reimer,Write-ins
14.20% 1836 Democrat Van Buren 57.80% 50.83%   24.80% 36.63% Harrison(9) Whig   17.40% 12.54% White,Webster,Mangum,Other
12.34% 1828 Democrat Jackson 68.20% 55.97%   31.80% 43.63% Adams(6) Nat-Reps   0.00% 0.40% Write-ins
12.17% 1856 Democrat Buchanan 58.80% 45.28%   38.50% 33.11% Freemont Republican   2.70% 21.61% Fillmore(13),Other
11.80% 1872 Republican Grant 78.10% 55.63%   18.00% 43.83% Greeley Democrat   3.90% 0.54% O’Conor, Greeley died before EC met, his votes split
10.85% 1952 Republican Eisenhower 83.24% 55.18%   16.76% 44.33% Stevenson Democrat   0.00% 0.49% Hallinan,Hamblen,Hass,Hoopes,MacArthur,Dobbs,Write-ins,Krajewski
10.06% 1864 Republican Lincoln 90.60% 55.02%   9.00% 44.96% McClellan Democrat   0.40% 0.02% Others
9.96% 1940 Democrat Roosevelt(32) 84.56% 54.74%   15.44% 44.78% Willkie Republican   0.00% 0.48% Thomas,Babson,Browder,Aiken,Write-ins,Knutson
9.74% 1980 Republican Reagan 90.89% 50.75%   9.11% 41.01% Carter(39) Democrat   0.00% 8.24% Anderson,Clark,Commoner,Hall,Rarick,DeBerry,McCormack,M.Smith,Write-ins,Griswold,No candidate,Bubar,McReynolds, Greaves Jr.,Pulley,R.Congress,Lynen,Gahres,Shelton,Wendelken,McLain
8.53% 1908 Republican Taft 66.46% 51.57%   33.54% 43.04% Bryan Democrat   0.00% 5.39% Debs,Chafin,Hisgen,WatsonGillhaus,Faction,Turney,Write-ins
8.51% 1996 Democrat Clinton 70.45% 49.23%   29.55% 40.72% Dole Republican   0.00% 10.05% Perot,Nader,Browne,Phillips,Hagelin,Moorehead,Feinland,Write-ins,Collins,Harris,No candidate,Peron,Hollis,White,Templin,Dodge,Crane,Forbes,Birrenback,Masters,Michael,
7.72% 1988 Republican Bush(41) 79.18% 53.37%   20.63% 45.65% Dukakis Democrat   0.19% 0.98% Paul,Fulani,Duke,McCarthy,Griffen,LaRouche,Marra,Write-ins,Winn,Warren,Lewin,Dodge,Holmes,No candidate,Kenoyer,Dennis,Herer,Youngkeit,Martin,Other
7.50% 1944 Democrat Roosevelt(32) 81.36% 53.39%   18.64% 45.89% Dewey Republican   0.00% 0.72% No candidate(TX),Thomas,Watson,Teichert,No candidate(S.Dem),Write-ins,G.Smith
6.97% 1852 Democrat Pierce 85.80% 50.84%   14.20% 43.87% Scott Whig   0.00% 5.29% Hale,Other
6.12% 1900 Republican McKinley 65.32% 51.64%   34.68% 45.52% Bryan Democrat   0.00% 2.84% Woolley,Debs,Barker,Maloney,Ellis,Write-ins,Leonard,Anti-Imperialist
6.07% 1840 Whig Harrison(9) 79.60% 52.88%   20.40% 46.81% Van Buren(8) Democrat   0.00% 0.31% Birney,Other
5.56% 1992 Democrat Clinton 68.77% 43.01%   31.23% 37.45% Bush(41) Republican   0.00% 19.54% Perot,Marrou,Gritz,Fulani,Phillips,Hagelin,Daniels,LaRouche,Warren,Write-ins,Bradford,Herer,Brisben,Halyard,No candidate,Yiamouyiannis,Ehlers,Dodge,Boren,Hem,Masters,Smith,LaRiva
5.32% 1868 Republican Grant 72.80% 52.66%   27.20% 47.34% Seymour Democrat   0.00% 0.00% Other - 46 votes nation-wide
4.79% 1848 Whig Taylor 56.20% 47.28%   43.80% 42.49% Cass Democrat   0.00% 10.23% Van Buren(8),Other
4.48% 1948 Democrat Truman 57.06% 49.55%   35.59% 45.07% Dewey Republican   7.35% 5.38% Thurmond,Wallace,Thomas,Watson,Teichert,Dobbs,Write-ins
4.33% 1896 Republican McKinley 60.63% 51.03%   39.37% 46.70% Bryan Democrat   0.00% 2.27% Palmer,Levering,Matchett,Bentley,Write-ins
3.12% 1916 Democrat Wilson 52.17% 49.24%   47.83% 46.12% Hughes Republican   0.00% 4.64% Benson,Hanly,Progressive,Reimer,Write-ins
3.01% 1892 Democrat Cleveland(24) 62.39% 46.02%   32.66% 43.01% Harrison(23) Republican   4.95% 10.97% Weaver,Bidwell,Wing,Write-ins
2.46% 2004 Republican Bush(43) 53.20% 50.73%   46.70% 48.27% Kerry Democrat   0.10% 1.00% Nader,Badnarik,Peroutka,Cobb,Write-ins,Peltier,Brown,Calero,None,Harens,Amondson,Van Auken,Parker,Jay,Andress,Dodge
2.06% 1976 Democrat Carter 55.20% 50.08%   44.61% 48.02% Ford(38) Republican   0.19% 1.90% McCarthy,MacBride,Maddox,Anderson,Camejo,Hall,Wright,LaRouche,Write-ins,Bubar,Levin,Zeidler,No candidate,Miller,F.Taylor,Other
1.46% 1844 Democrat Polk 61.80% 49.54%   38.20% 48.08% Clay Whig   0.00% 2.38% Birney,Other
0.70% 1968 Republican Nixon 55.95% 43.42%   35.50% 42.72% Humphrey Democrat   8.55% 13.86% Wallace,Blomen,Gregory,Halstead,Cleaver,McCarthy,Munn,No candidate,Write-ins,Chavez,Mitchell,Hensley
0.25% 1884 Democrat Cleveland(22) 54.60% 48.50%   45.40% 48.25% Blaine Republican   0.00% 3.25% Butler,St.John,Other
0.17% 1960 Democrat Kennedy 56.42% 49.72%   40.78% 49.55% Nixon(37) Republican   2.80% 0.73% Unpledged,Hass,Decker,Faubus,Dobbs,Sullivan,J.Lee,Coiner,Write-ins,Daly,C.King,Curtis
0.02% 1880 Republican Garfield 58.00% 48.27%   42.00% 48.25% Hancock Democrat   0.00% 3.48% Weaver,Other
-0.51% 2000 Republican Bush(43) 50.37% 47.87%   49.44% 48.38% Gore Democrat   0.19% 3.75% Nader,P.Buchanan,Browne,Phillips,Hagelin,Write-ins,Harris,L.Smith,McReynolds,Moorehead,No candidate,Brown,Lane,Venson,Dodge,Youngkeit,Other
-0.80% 1888 Republican Harrison(23) 58.10% 47.82%   41.90% 48.62% Cleveland(22,24) Democrat   0.00% 3.56% Fisk,Streeter,Other
-3.02% 1876 Republican Hayes 50.10% 47.95%   49.90% 50.97% Tilden Democrat   0.00% 1.08% Cooper,Other
-10.43% 1824 Dem-Reps Adams(6) 32.20% 30.92%   37.90% 41.35% Jackson(7) Dem-Reps   29.90% 27.73% Election under 12th Amendment. Crawford,Clay,Unpledged,Write-ins
                             
  ALL   Average: 71.31% 51.32%   28.21% 42.03%       7.75% 6.65%  
      Median: 70.45% 50.94%   29.41% 43.34%       0.00% 3.10%  





dvwjr

159 posted on 09/11/2008 9:14:00 AM PDT by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: kabar

160 posted on 09/11/2008 9:53:23 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson