Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Warner's Clinton Problem (former aide "I can't believe no one has mentioned his philandering")
http://radaronline.com/ ^ | 10/12/06 | radaronline

Posted on 09/10/2008 6:51:38 PM PDT by Maelstorm

"I can't believe no one has mentioned his philandering," a former political aide tells Radar, adding that she herself was subjected to Warner's advances in the late '90s and had heard "stories about Mark and many interns."

"This can't be isolated. I have to believe this stuff is all over," a former D.C. consultant tells Radar.

(Excerpt) Read more at radaronline.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bimboeruption; edwards; electioncongress; electionussenate; horseface; interns; markwarner; philandering; warner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Interesting...given John Edwards this could be worth a story or two for someone who cares to investigate it. Warner is seen as lifting Obama in Virginia. Hmmm interesting...Some times old news is good news.


1 posted on 09/10/2008 6:51:39 PM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Rosacea much?


2 posted on 09/10/2008 6:54:19 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Well, it’s getting late in the game to out this kind of behavior.


3 posted on 09/10/2008 6:56:51 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Is that picture from George Mason Univ?


4 posted on 09/10/2008 6:57:29 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

How do you think Ms. Hillary kept him out of the current Prez race? Of course they had the goods on him.


5 posted on 09/10/2008 6:57:39 PM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

You don’t suppose there is a relationship between this story and his decision to drop out of the presidential race to “spend more time with my family?”

As well as with his decision to remove himself from consideration for Obama’s VP slot?


6 posted on 09/10/2008 6:59:00 PM PDT by freespirited (Obama's idea of change: from D.C. politics as usual to Chicago politics as usual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I’m sick of hearing about peoples’ sex lives and I no longer consider it as an issue when I vote.


7 posted on 09/10/2008 7:00:28 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; DRey; Norman Bates; paddles

Same rumor I’ve been hearing for years. That Warner’s got a zipper problem to rival Charming Billy’s.

Otherwise, a reasonably popular, reasonably moderate former VA governor should have been the natural choice to have contested with Hillary for the Dem nomination.


8 posted on 09/10/2008 7:00:51 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Dude, I’m a sick of it as you are, unfortunately, a man who cannot exercise control over himself in one important area of his life and who betrays his family should not be trusted with our National Security and National Purse.

Do we need to rehash recent history?


9 posted on 09/10/2008 7:03:07 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
My feelings exactly. I'm not concerned about the behavioral
aspect of it. I am concerned when someone makes a promise to
a spouse, an easy promise to deliver on because it's totally under their control, breaks that promise. How can they be trusted to deliver on an oath of office, when protecting and defending is dependent on so many factors not under their control? If they can't deliver on an easy promise, how can they deliver on the difficult ones, or even be trusted to try?
10 posted on 09/10/2008 7:13:01 PM PDT by Thanks RR Rest Well (Vote Obama - Get Free Stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
I’m sick of hearing about peoples’ sex lives and I no longer consider it as an issue when I vote.

People don't have sex lives. They have lives and sex is part of them. Normally it is a private matter. Occasionally they misbehave and violate the law and/or public trust by using their position to obtain sexual partners. That is an issue to consider when voting or prosecuting.

11 posted on 09/10/2008 7:19:32 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (Waiting for Samson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Gilmore is 25 points behind. He needs something, i.e., a macaca moment from Warner. Maybe this is it.


12 posted on 09/10/2008 7:21:24 PM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Inappropriate or illegal indulgence in sex, drugs, corruption, lying, plagiarizing, smarmy friends, treacherous behavior, draft dodging, etc, etc. etc......are all indicators that point to CHARACTER...

I would personally prefer to not elect a flawed character, to serve in the extraordinarily powerful office of President of the United States......

Extraordinary responsibilities call for extraordinary CHARACTER.

There are plenty of positions in the world for a very normal bozo like Warner and others I can think of who have already achieved positions far above their ability.


13 posted on 09/10/2008 7:33:33 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I take it, then, that you won’t be voting for McCain.


14 posted on 09/10/2008 7:36:59 PM PDT by srp7a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

You know I think this story has some credibility. Not just because I’m no fan of Warner but the more you think of this rising star and then see him sidelined for someone like Joe Biden. I do think it is worth a double check given Edwards. If this is true. Oh my how much fun this would ad to the Obama/Democrat woe. Republicans had the Foley crud and the Media and Democrats piled on. Fair is fair in my book. If Warner was a pubbie he’d be guilty whether or not in the mind of the media.


15 posted on 09/10/2008 7:38:02 PM PDT by Maelstorm (This country was not founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a government check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

He was a high school classmate of both my brother and sister and they don’t have much nice to say about him. In fact, I could not print what they have to say about him.


16 posted on 09/10/2008 7:38:46 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (Let's Roll!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Well, of course. He was all gung-ho running for president, raising money, etc, then out of nowhere comes an announcement that he needs to spend more time with his family. You know that line is bogus whenever it passes a politician’s lips, but in this case, it was even more bizarre than usual.

I was surprised to hear his name re-surface in the context of the VP race. It circulated for a while, then the same thing happened; he took himself out of contention. Needless to say, the infidelity question is a standard part of the vetting process.

Note also that Webb was being pushed for VP and appeared to want it badly, then suddenly took himself out of contention. As you have probably read here, Warner ain’t the only Virginia politician rumored to have a Bubba problem.


17 posted on 09/10/2008 7:51:11 PM PDT by freespirited (Obama's idea of change: from D.C. politics as usual to Chicago politics as usual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
In fact, I could not print what they have to say about him.

Don't worry, just post it. I really doubt you will offend anyone here.

18 posted on 09/10/2008 7:53:16 PM PDT by freespirited (Obama's idea of change: from D.C. politics as usual to Chicago politics as usual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

“I’m sick of hearing about peoples’ sex lives and I no longer consider it as an issue when I vote.”

You are mistaken, and most people instinctively understand that such a view is misguided. Here’s why:

How a man conducts himself in his private affairs, far from being irrelevant, is most instructive in telling us what kind of a leader he will be.

I have greater confidence in a man who has been a faithful husband in an enduring marriage - even if I disagree on policy issues - than I would a philanderer.

Why? Cheating INVARIABLY involves lying, deception, and betrayal. It is a myth that we can hermetically seal different parts of our life. You can place a great deal of confidence (note I do not say absolute trust - no man deserves that - only God) in a man of character and integrity. You can never place your confidence in someone who willfully, habitually breaks his marriage vows.

Would you trust such a man to be alone with your wife (the question is not your wife - of course you trust her), or your attractive college-age daughter? Why would you assume that such a person would act with integrity in other areas?

I am not speaking here so much of the “one time” marital failure followed by heartfelt confession, but rather the deceitful way of life unfortunately followed by some men in positions of power.

Does this mean that in every case sexually immoral men make bad policy decisions? Of course not. Sen. Craig, for example, was on the right side on quite a few issues. But I would suspect that many of his votes were politically expedient, and that the overall effect of his political career was negative because his behavior in public restrooms cast conservatives as laughable hypocrites.

The Bible says “Whatever a man sows; he will reap.” We also read: “Be sure your sin will find you out” (Now I am to be dismissed as a “Bible thumper”...). In the political realm, if a politician is sowing that which is a moral betrayal of his wedding vows, the net effect, both personally and his influence upon the political process will be negative rather than positive.


19 posted on 09/10/2008 8:33:37 PM PDT by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: srp7a
Hail and farewell, troll.

That sound you hear is VK-Zot One spooling up.

20 posted on 09/10/2008 8:37:55 PM PDT by Tenniel2 (You can't vote "present" in the Oval Office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson