Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Bill Could Strip D.C. Of Control - Congress Weighs Repealing Ban On Semiautomatics
Washington Post ^ | September 9, 2008 | Mary Beth Sheridan

Posted on 09/10/2008 2:20:22 PM PDT by neverdem

B01

Congress plans to take up a bill this week that would repeal the District's gun-registration requirements and make it easier for residents to legally buy semiautomatic weapons, raising alarm among city officials that the measure would effectively end local gun control.

Chiefs of the D.C. police, the Capitol Police, the Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies are expected to testify against the bill during a House hearing today. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.

But the tougher legislation is likely to prevail in the House, according to congressional sources and supporters and opponents of the bill. It has won the backing of 48 Democrats, many facing reelection in strongly pro-gun areas, and is expected to pick up broad support among Republicans.

The legislation has four main goals. It would repeal the D.C. ban on semiautomatic pistols and rifles; eliminate the city's gun-registration requirements; allow District residents to purchase guns in Virginia and Maryland; and abolish the regulation that guns kept at home be unloaded and either disassembled or fitted with trigger locks.

Opponents of the legislation said it could have even more far-reaching effects because of what they termed its vague provisions.

"You could drive a truck through this language," said Peter Nickles, acting D.C. attorney general. He noted that the bill would bar the D.C. government from passing any laws that would...

--snip--

"I'm very concerned that, under that legislation, the gun-rights advocates could challenge almost any restriction we've placed on gun ownership," Nickles said. Opponents said they feared that if the bill became law, people could carry loaded semiautomatic weapons or .50-caliber sniper rifles in the city...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; nra

1 posted on 09/10/2008 2:20:23 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Please repeal our assault rifle ban in California too!!!


2 posted on 09/10/2008 2:21:45 PM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And the down side??


3 posted on 09/10/2008 2:26:37 PM PDT by Ricebug (NKP RTAFB 70/71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"You could drive a truck through this language," said Peter Nickles,..

Unlike DC that just threw the USSC decision under the bus and backed over it.

4 posted on 09/10/2008 2:29:00 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.

So let me get this straight. She wants to pass a law saying that they have to obey the law. Only a Democrat could be that screwed up.

5 posted on 09/10/2008 2:31:10 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.

Redundant. That's exactly what the original bill does.

6 posted on 09/10/2008 2:35:01 PM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Why don’t the Secret Service, the Capitol police, and the D.C. police set an example and give up THEIR guns first?

What part of “shall not be infringed” don’t these gun-grabbers understand?


7 posted on 09/10/2008 2:36:27 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The Super Collider was fired up in Switzerland and a Black Hole was created.....it's called Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

.......Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) .....

Phony nothingness, pretending to be relevant. Affirmative action gone out of control


8 posted on 09/10/2008 2:37:57 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Opponents said they feared that if the bill became law, people could carry loaded ... .50-caliber sniper rifles in the city...

GMAFB. How stupid does anyone have to be to fall for this bovine excrement?

9 posted on 09/10/2008 2:41:54 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obomination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Opponents said they feared that if the bill became law, people could carry loaded ... .50-caliber sniper rifles in the city...


Does DC have a rifle caliber ban?


10 posted on 09/10/2008 3:19:26 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Chiefs of the D.C. police, the Capitol Police, the Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies are expected to testify against the bill during a House hearing today.

What part of NO do these a$$hats NOT understand? Who does enforce the decisions of the SC. Can the SC call out the marshals to arrest someone for willful obstruction of justice or anything like that?

11 posted on 09/10/2008 3:23:07 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (McCain/Palin 2008 : Palin the Paladin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"You could drive a truck through this language," said Peter Nickles, acting D.C. attorney general.

We plan to.

12 posted on 09/10/2008 3:23:50 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
“Opponents said they feared that if the bill became law, people could carry loaded ... .50-caliber sniper rifles in the city...”

...and they're going to do what with it, hold up a liquor store with a .50-caliber rifle? What a bunch of a$$monkeys...I've got a .50-caliber rifle in my gun safe and the thing is about 5-ft long and weighs about 65 lbs!

13 posted on 09/10/2008 3:30:29 PM PDT by Towed_Jumper (Stephen Hopkins: Founding Father who had Cerebral Palsy.."My hand trembles, my heart does not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
"GMAFB. How stupid does anyone have to be to fall for this bovine excrement?"

Stupid enough to believe that socialism can work

14 posted on 09/10/2008 3:38:20 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.

Now there's some legislation with some teeth! Legally requiring them to do what they're already legally required to do. This twit is probably the type person who thinks you can make criminals stop carrying by passing a law against it.

15 posted on 09/10/2008 4:54:00 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

and they’re going to do what with it, hold up a liquor store with a .50-caliber rifle?


No, the fear among the elites is that the peons might blast through their taxpayer-funded armored limousines.


16 posted on 09/10/2008 5:37:54 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Opponents of the legislation said it could have even more far-reaching effects because of what they termed its vague provisions.

"You could drive a truck through this language,"

As long as it has a gunrack in the back window with a full compliment of wepons.

17 posted on 09/10/2008 5:56:06 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed the Republicans with stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson