1 posted on
09/10/2008 2:20:23 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Please repeal our assault rifle ban in California too!!!
2 posted on
09/10/2008 2:21:45 PM PDT by
djsherin
To: neverdem
3 posted on
09/10/2008 2:26:37 PM PDT by
Ricebug
(NKP RTAFB 70/71)
To: neverdem
"You could drive a truck through this language," said Peter Nickles,..Unlike DC that just threw the USSC decision under the bus and backed over it.
To: neverdem
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.So let me get this straight. She wants to pass a law saying that they have to obey the law. Only a Democrat could be that screwed up.
To: neverdem
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns. Redundant. That's exactly what the original bill does.
6 posted on
09/10/2008 2:35:01 PM PDT by
steve-b
(Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
To: neverdem
Why don’t the Secret Service, the Capitol police, and the D.C. police set an example and give up THEIR guns first?
What part of “shall not be infringed” don’t these gun-grabbers understand?
7 posted on
09/10/2008 2:36:27 PM PDT by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(The Super Collider was fired up in Switzerland and a Black Hole was created.....it's called Obama!)
To: neverdem
.......Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) .....
Phony nothingness, pretending to be relevant. Affirmative action gone out of control
8 posted on
09/10/2008 2:37:57 PM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
To: neverdem
Opponents said they feared that if the bill became law, people could carry loaded ... .50-caliber sniper rifles in the city... GMAFB. How stupid does anyone have to be to fall for this bovine excrement?
9 posted on
09/10/2008 2:41:54 PM PDT by
Ancesthntr
(An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obomination from becoming President)
To: neverdem
Chiefs of the D.C. police, the Capitol Police, the Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies are expected to testify against the bill during a House hearing today. What part of NO do these a$$hats NOT understand? Who does enforce the decisions of the SC. Can the SC call out the marshals to arrest someone for willful obstruction of justice or anything like that?
11 posted on
09/10/2008 3:23:07 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(McCain/Palin 2008 : Palin the Paladin 2012)
To: neverdem
"You could drive a truck through this language," said Peter Nickles, acting D.C. attorney general.
We plan to.
12 posted on
09/10/2008 3:23:50 PM PDT by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - Vote against the dem party)
To: neverdem
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) plans to introduce a substitute bill that would simply mandate that D.C.'s gun laws conform to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.Now there's some legislation with some teeth! Legally requiring them to do what they're already legally required to do. This twit is probably the type person who thinks you can make criminals stop carrying by passing a law against it.
15 posted on
09/10/2008 4:54:00 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: neverdem
Opponents of the legislation said it could have even more far-reaching effects because of what they termed its vague provisions. "You could drive a truck through this language,"
As long as it has a gunrack in the back window with a full compliment of wepons.
17 posted on
09/10/2008 5:56:06 PM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed the Republicans with stupid enemies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson