Posted on 09/07/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by jern
Drudge: NY Times Prepares To Front Expose on Palin's Baby...Developing...
I think his campaign thought the hard part was going to be destroying Hillary - this was to be the easy part of his coronation. In the words of Gomer Pyle, “Surprise, surprise, surprise!”
I saw a poll on a Website in upstate NY showing McCain winning by 85 percent lol!
And she said the reason she could hide the pregnancy was she wasn’t showing- thanks to her toned abs.
story:
WOMAN HAS BABY!
I’ve seen that theory all over the left wing blogs.
“If its true, how could Bristol be 5 monthes pregnant now?”
The times may contend that she could be a rabbit.
There’s no need to call Bristol names. Who are you to judge her?
NY Times declares bankruptcy. Developing.
Perhaps you are correct and it is a positive article coming. I just saw this post over at Ace of Spades blog:
___________________________________________________Have Obama’s Marching Orders to the Media Gone Out?
— Ace
Detestable Andi suddenly very pro-Trig.
In thinking about this astonishing week, and what’s to come, I want to go on record again as saying that the decision to bring up a child with Down Syndrome is one of the most noble, beautiful and admirable decisions any person can make. That Sarah Palin is doing that says a huge amount in favor of her. The love obviously being shown toward tiny Trig is also about as profound an advertisement for genuine, pro-life Christianity as you can have. It means that, in this respect, Palin has walked the walk of the pro-life movement - in ways that many others have not. In my view, and I mean this as passionately as I mean my criticisms of her public record, this really is God’s work.
Are you congratulating Trig’s mother Bristol then, Sullivan?
Seems like the new orders are “Avoid Backlash.”
The media let its mask slip badly, the public got a good look at them. Their hatred, their unprofessionalism, their hypocrisy, their transparently urgent longing for President Obama and their willingness to destroy anyone or anything who threatens that.
Whether or not this is coordinated with Obama I have no idea; it’s possible they themselves realized what a despicable spectacle they made of themselves.
Or it really might be Obama — and his internal polling — telling them to back off. Or maybe not “telling” them to; just sharing with his allies in the media what his own polling and strategists have found. Hey, they’re all in this together; hang together or hang apart.
Thanks for the explanation.
The detestable Andrew Sullivan is now saying nice things about Trig and Gov. Palin, after days of trashing them and insinuating that Trig is Bristol’s child. I think this NY Times piece is going to be very flattering to Sarah. And I think the reason is that Barry’s internal polls are so absolutely awful that he has told all of his surrogates in the left-wing media to back off or they’re going to spoil his chances.
LOL yeah...and actually I think that was embroidered, which had to have been expensive. IIRC it had the logo and the lettering, that would be a high stitch count, then either added to the seat, or a custom seat cover. Boy that Obama knows how to spend money!
Gore - Kerry - Obama, three strikes.
This kind of crap won’t be printed when Murdoch takes over the Times.
It’s a nothing burger.
What a waste of FR talent!
What better way to stop a Murdoch takeover bid than to slander a baby internationally. It will be 10 years before the Courts get done dividing up the carcass.
I want to see Sarah show up on Monday Night Football!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.