Obama: A Forgery is Unacceptable!

The day before McCain surprised the nation with his pick of Sarah Palin as his running mate, I had a ‘discussion’ with a woman I have known for many years.

Although well into the “gifted” range (so called “genius“ ) she has a penchant for choosing political losers!

She is a walking talking example that IQ and common sense do not necessarily follow the same ark.

I had once argued, that if I were President, I would put her on my staff as a reverse barometer; I would do the opposite of whatever course of action she would suggest I take -- in regards to my Presidential duties.

So it should be no surprise to you, my readers, that she thinks Obama is the greatest thing since hot-popped corn!

As an old-time liberal acquaintance of mine used to say of her -- and he considered himself pretty liberal in his day -- “she is WAY-OUT in LEFT field” (he was also a big baseball fan!)

I had sent her some links regarding the charge by one or more forensic experts that Obama’s certificate of live birth -- displayed on his “fight the smears” website (fightthesmears.com) -- is a poorly done forgery!

Sometime later we had a discussion on the phone about the implications of Obama not coming forth with his actual birth certificate or an authentic original copy.

“After all it wouldn’t be his fault if his mother was unwed when he was born,” I said.

“He would publish a poor forgery and hide his real birth certificate to cover it up?” I continued.

Then the discussion turned toward “other things” … and I had to hear the inevitable “hate Bush” tirade… words that spew forth from the mouth’s of lefties, like the turbulent waters that broke through the Levies in New Orleans propelled terribly, if irrationally, by hurricane Katrina.

After hanging up the phone the discussion I had with her, about the possibility of Obama being born out of wedlock, was pushed to the back of my mind where it was filed under:

Obama / birth / birth-certificate / cover-up / fake certificate of live birth / possible motives / illegitimate.

A couple of days passed and then came the announcement that John McCain had chosen Sarah Palin for his running mate, and I was energized by the prospect of an intelligent, well grounded, conservative woman -- a very beautiful woman -- as Vice President of the United states.

And, of course, the mainstream media wolves -- ever hungry for red-meat -- were licking their chops!

Then Obama made the well known statement that children and family should be “out of bounds” and that, after all, “his own mother was only eighteen when she had him”.

When he said “ families are out of bounds” I got the impression that he was attempting to preclude any snooping into his own family background.

That discussion I had with my “progressive” acquaintance about the possibility that Obama was born out of wedlock.

Now I want everyone to know that I don’t think that if Obama were born ‘illegitimate’ that it should -- because of any perceived impropriety of his mother and father -- have any bearing on his qualifications (or lack thereof) to be President of the United States.

“By his own account, Hamilton was born in Charlestown, the capital of Nevis in the British West Indies, out of wedlock, to Rachel Faucett Lavien” (wikipedia)

Would an illegitimate birth generate enough shame within Obama, that in order to avoid such a stigma, he would cover it up by publishing a fake certificate of live birth, in lieu of a birth certificate or an original copy of one?

Or, perhaps, there is an authentic certificate of live birth with “father unknown” … written on it because his mother could not produce a marriage license, at the time of Obama’s birth.

However, as I suggested, such a revelation would not necessarily hurt him politically.

I think if he were picked-on over this issue it would actually gain him sympathy with the public.

“Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.” ( Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals)

Picking on Obama for “the sins” of his parents would garner sympathy from the public.

To judge him for this would be as bad as condemning him for the color of his skin.

Despite the propaganda that came out of Obama’s “former” mentor, reverend Wright:

Is it possible that Obama WANT’S his illegitimacy to be discovered -- preferably by conservatives -- in order to garner public sympathy?

Look, no one opposes an Obama Presidency more than I, however, if he were beat-up solely on the basis of a perceived stigma of being born “illegitimate” even I would sympathize with him!

However, it is undeniable that the COVER-UP of such an event as his illegitimate birth would be within his control and, therefore, the public would be justified in debating the pros and cons of such a cover-up by Obama’s campaign:

There are also questions about whether his Mother’s being unmarried at the time of his birth would have on the well known “natural born citizen” requirement to become President, under The Constitution Of The United States.

Would shame of his “illegitimate” birth be enough of a motive for Obama’s campaign to publish a very poor forgery of a certificate of live birth… a forgery that they must have known had a good chance of being discovered as such?

The original copy paper says (not on the copy-image itself but on the copy paper to the left of the copy-image) “must be validated on back” … and there is a date and signature etc.

It cost me about ten dollars (in those days) for an official original copy of my birth certificate, on file at my state capital.

Having lost my birth certificate, I needed an original copy in order to get a driver license, a bank account, and ultimately… a job.

Employers -- especially companies that must report taxis and pay into workers compensation and other programs -- expect to see some sort of identification from a potential employee.

The American people may be “hiring” Barack Obama as the next President of The United States.

As a potential employee we (the People of the United States) would like Obama to submit legitimate identification, namely:

“He’s not a natural born citizen.”

Perhaps!

This is what this article is about.

There are two things to know.

(1)Obama submitted a fake certificate of live birth.

(2)There IS a cover-up.

Therefore, only a second class citizen would not demand that Obama submit a legitimate birth certificate or an original copy.

Case closed!

We can’t be 100% what the reasons for the cover-up are.

Thats why we need to demand Obama submit a proper certificate.

That’s WHY I wrote this article!

Thanks for your post.

STE=Q

I find Obama’s involvement with these tax funded Black Muslim Madrasahs to be much more worthy of our concern than his questionable birth certificate.

“Michelle’s Boot Camps For Radicals”
Investor’s Business Daily
Date: 9/5/2008

Election ‘08: Democrats’ reintroduction of militant Michelle Obama in Denver
was supposed to show her softer side. But it only highlighted a radical part
of her resume: Public Allies.

Barack Obama was a founding member of the board of Public Allies in 1992,
resigning before his wife became executive director of the Chicago chapter
of Public Allies in 1993. Obama plans to use the nonprofit group, which he
features on his campaign Web site, as the model for a national service
corps. He calls his Orwellian program, “Universal Voluntary Public Service.”

Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas. They plan to herd American youth into
government-funded reeducation camps where they’ll be brainwashed into
thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of “social change.”

The pitch Public Allies makes on its Web site doesn’t seem all that radical.
It promises to place young adults (18-30) in paid one-year “community
leadership” positions with nonprofit or government agencies. They’ll also be
required to attend weekly training workshops and three retreats.

In exchange, they’ll get a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health
and child care. They also get a post-service education award of $4,725 that
can be used to pay off past student loans or fund future education.

But its real mission is to radicalize American youth and use them to bring
about “social change” through threats, pressure, tension and confrontation -
the tactics used by the father of community organizing, Saul “The Red”
Alinsky.

“Our alumni are more than twice as likely as 18-34 year olds to . engage in
protest activities,” Public Allies boasts in a document found with its tax
filings. It has already deployed an army of 2,200 community organizers like
Obama to agitate for “justice” and “equality” in his hometown of Chicago and
other U.S. cities, including Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, New York,
Phoenix, Pittsburgh and Washington. “I get to practice being an activist,”
and get paid for it, gushed Cincinnati recruit Amy Vincent.

Public Allies promotes “diversity and inclusion,” a program paper says. More
than 70% of its recruits are “people of color.” When they’re not protesting,
they’re staffing AIDS clinics, handing out condoms, bailing criminals out of
jail and helping illegal aliens and the homeless obtain food stamps and
other welfare.

Public Allies brags that more than 80% of graduates have continued working
in nonprofit or government jobs. It’s training the “next generation of
nonprofit leaders” - future “social entrepreneurs.”

The Obamas discourage work in the private sector. “Don’t go into corporate
America,” Michelle has exhorted youth. “Work for the community. Be social
workers.” Shun the “money culture,” Barack added. “Individual salvation
depends on collective salvation.”

“If you commit to serving your community,” he pledged in his Denver
acceptance speech, “we will make sure you can afford a college education.”
So, go through government to go to college, and then go back into
government.

Many of today’s youth find the pitch attractive. “I may spend the rest of my
life trying to create social movement,” said Brian Coovert of the Cincinnati
chapter. “There is always going to be work to do. Until we have a perfect
country, I’ll have a job.”

Not all the recruits appreciate the PC indoctrination. “It was too
touchy-feely,” said Nelly Nieblas, 29, of the 2005 Los Angeles class. “It’s
a lot of talk about race, a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about
homophobia, talk about -isms and phobias.”

One of those -isms is “heterosexism,” which a Public Allies training seminar
in Chicago describes as a negative byproduct of “capitalism, white
supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege.”

The government now funds about half of Public Allies’ expenses through
Clinton’s AmeriCorps. Obama wants to fully fund it and expand it into a
national program that some see costing $500 billion. “We’ve got to have a
civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong,
just as well-funded” as the military, he said.

The gall of it: The Obamas want to create a boot camp for radicals who hate
the military - and stick American taxpayers with the bill.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.