Posted on 09/01/2008 8:26:27 AM PDT by sam_paine
How many times have we seen this photo on FR?
How many times have we propagated the Huma/Hillary lesbian rumor mill with a wink and a nod and a [POST]?
No he made an accusation and pointed his finger at everyone here...including you I might add.
Start with the 2004 FR link in the post at the beginning, fastguy. That's where I got the pic to begin with.
Interesting.
newsflash the Hillary alternative lifestyle rumor has circulated for years (as well as bills)
Huma did not originate here but in one of the print media.
The diffenece is that Palain lie is being pushed to “stop palin” because she has energized conservatives.
It is not about the pregnancy, it is about stopping palin at any and ALL costs.
“What if one is true and the other isn’t?”
Doesn’t matter he’s done what he wanted to.
Guess he figures he’s done his good dead for the day...accusing ALL of us of the heinous crime.
re #57:
I normally like your post but you are dead wrong and your attack is personal and out of bounds. I’ve reported you to the mods.
[ Joes, Same way we (and Drudge) paint all Dems by association with what we see on Kos or DU. ]
Another bullseye, Sam. Great thread.
” I’m sorry, but the Huma Abedin story involves a very legitimate threat to national security:
Huma Abedin & Hillary Clinton - Abedin Family Ties to Al-Qaeda
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1924323/posts
Huma Abedin & Hillary Clinton - Who is Funding Huma Abedin’s Lifestyle?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1921983/posts
Is Huma Abedin an Agent of Saudi Intelligence?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1919649/posts
I don’t know whether Huma & Hillary engage in any mutual carpet diving with one another, but there isn’t a doubt in my mind that Huma has connections to Saudi intelligence, and probably Pakistani intelligence [which is in bed with the Taliban in Afghanistan], and maybe even straight through all the way to Bin Laden himself. “
BUMP!
And there’s the difference. One goes directly on the attack to smear the reputation of a child, the other pokes fun at an adult. No moral equivalence at all.
That's a good tagline!!! =)
Feel free to improve my Google search. That was my first guess and it turned up over 200 hits on that topic.
Again with the "we."
I honestly have no idea how you form your opinion about Dems. On the other hand, I hear the crap from Kos and DU -- I see it in the newspapers -- I hear it from the MSM on TV -- and then I see/hear it confirmed every day in daily discourse, from libs in the workplace, in the supermarket, at the gym, in my family, etc. etc. etc.
So no, sir, I do not "paint all Dems by association." I, unfortunately, get multiple confirmations of how Dems think every single day.
YOU made the claim...YOU provide the proof.
Only a colossal jackass comes in here pointing fingers with nothing more than hot air to back it up.
Gosh, he said "we" when he meant "some of us." Doesn't make the initial observation incorrect.
Chelsea is an adult. She has traveled around the world giving anti-american speeches. She inserted herself into politics. She is fair game, IMHO.
You’re right. As conservatives, we should act like ladies and gentlemen on these posts. The facts are on our side; we don’t have to resort to shaming a young woman over something she could not help.
Although I never posted a photo like that, I did fail to call the poster on that issue.
Absolutely! The primary defense against slander or libel is TRUTH.
Unfortunately, rumors know no such bounds.
Considering the history of the Clintons and their friends, that pic is perfectly acceptable as a question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.