Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cantor Would Be a Viable Alternative
411 Mania ^ | August 26, 2008 | Kristopher Rodriguez

Posted on 08/26/2008 2:17:50 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan

John McCain is set to make his vice presidential announcement within the next three to four days. Names speculated to be on his short list includes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Tom Ridge, Joe Lieberman, and Congressman Eric Cantor. Most pro-life conservatives want Ridge and Lieberman removed from the list because they favor abortion rights. If McCain wants to keep social conservatives content, he'll have to choose either Romney, Pawlenty, or Cantor.

McCain has two crucial considerations to make before choosing a running mate. Could that running mate attack his counterparts with the same gusto as Joe Biden? The other consideration is whether his vice presidential pick would hinder his chances of winning on election day.

Let us first examine how each of those three match up against Biden. Romney has the invaluable experience of running a national campaign and participating in over a dozen debates. He knows the issues like the back of his hand and few things could stump him at this stage. He has also proven that he can go negative when necessary. In fact, Romney is so used to going negative that a slugfest with Biden might be right up his alley. Romney speaks with a high degree of confidence and is virtually impossible to ruffle. Tim Pawlenty, on the other hand, appears to be a bit green. He even struggled in a debate with Evan Bayh on an August 17th edition of Face the Nation. If a slow witted snooze like Bayh can give him trouble, a polished attack dog like Joe Biden could eat him for lunch.

Eric Cantor is a relentless and confident debater. He has proven during his interviews with Chris Matthews, Laura Ingraham, and CNN's John Roberts that he can masterfully defend conservative positions without even blinking an eye. He can also effectively attack his opponents when prompted. Cantor would be a thorn in the Obama Campaign's side.

In regards to who would do the least amount of damage to the ticket, Pawlenty and Cantor seem to hold an advantage over Romney with little elaboration necessary. Mitt Romney has the reputation of being a flip-flopper. His pro-choice positions of yesteryear are still bothersome to Evangelicals. Romney is also a Mormon. And even though this is the 21st century, Romney's religious faith is still problematic for many voters. It is unfortunate because Romney is immanently qualified to be president.

Pawlenty and Cantor would be inoffensive selections for McCain. Tim Pawlenty is an Evangelical Christian and Eric Cantor is Jewish. Both of them are pro-life. Eric Cantor's voting record in Congress earned him a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee and a 0% rating from NARAL.

For those keeping score, Eric Cantor fared well in both categories. Pawlenty and Romney presented problems for McCain.

Does that mean that Cantor is the best choice? It's tough to tell. Romney has credibility in economics during a time when the economy is a central issue. A McCain-Romney ticket brings with it expertise in foreign relations and economics. But McCain also can't ignore that Cantor has experience in business. Along with his law degree, Cantor holds a masters degree in real estate development. He also did work for several years in his family's business. Such experience gives him first hand insight into the small business world. Along with his credentials in economics, he also proposed the Middle Class Jobs Protection Act earlier this year. So while Romney would help McCain win over voters who have concerns over the economy, Cantor's experience might also attract the same voters.

A Romney selection would give McCain a chance to win Michigan, but a Cantor selection could put Virginia in the McCain column. Pawlenty, though an inoffensive choice, would still not be able to deliver Minnesota to the Republicans.

Out of the three candidates previously discussed, Cantor is probably the lowest on McCain's list. Romney is heavily favored to be McCain's running mate. But don't count out Cantor. He's a viable alternative to Romney.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; 2008veep; cantor; ericcantor; mccain; va2008; vp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2008 2:18:03 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan; A message; airborne; areukiddingme1; ari-freedom; AuH2ORepublican; bereanway; ...

Cantor, 3 new articles in 10 minutes!

What’s that I see on the horizon?


2 posted on 08/26/2008 2:18:55 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (McCain/Cantor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
I think what I like about Cantor is that he hasn't been in politics for long. Been in the House only since 2001. And he has well rounded private sector experience Joe Biden lacks. That's good. At 72, McCain needs a younger man to reach out to voters of my generation and the so called Millenials.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 08/26/2008 2:23:58 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
The other consideration is whether his vice presidential pick would hinder his chances of winning on election day

Ah, wouldn't a better consideration be whether his pick would help his chances of winning?

4 posted on 08/26/2008 2:26:02 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
I think it would be a political mistake this year for McCain to pick a WASP man as his VP. Instead, Palin, Cantor, or maybe Jindal. Boldness here would pay off. What if in the Ford-Carter race Ford had chosen Anne Armstrong as he had considered doing?
5 posted on 08/26/2008 2:27:35 PM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
A Cantor selection would make it a Western Southern ticket. The Bush Cheney ticket was the opposite - Southern Western. That would anchor down the South and the Mountain West states for the GOP in the fall.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

6 posted on 08/26/2008 2:28:25 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Cantor doesn’t have any baggage from the 2008 primaries. IMO he would be satisfactory to a very large swath of the GOP while alientating very little.


7 posted on 08/26/2008 2:31:32 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
I think political correctness should be avoided. It would be a mistake for McCain to choose someone because of their gender or their color. The only thing he should be concerned about is whether his Veep can serve as President in case he won't live out two terms in the Oval Office. And he would want some one young and energetic to shoulder much of the burden of policy so he can attend to the big tasks.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

8 posted on 08/26/2008 2:37:35 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
ERIC CANTOR is our David in this fight...

ERIC ( DAVID ) CANTOR slay the MSM, Liberal, Democrat giant.

9 posted on 08/26/2008 2:39:38 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Cantor, 3 new articles in 10 minutes!

Hmm....it's getting interesting! :-)

10 posted on 08/26/2008 2:45:32 PM PDT by retrokitten ("That would be crazy...CRAZY EXCITING!" - John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Victory for Conservatives?


11 posted on 08/26/2008 2:45:51 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Bigoted Neanderthal Evangelicals support Eric Cantor for VP. Shalom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Well, if people are worried about someone like Palin not having enough experience I don’t see how Cantor is a step up in that department.

I still favor Palin, she would be a much better asset in the campaign.

And though I supported Romney in the primary, I would rather McCain pick someone who will command attention in a “getting-to-know-you” type of deal. Nobody wants to know anything else about Romney. People would be interested in learning about a Palin, Jindal, etc.


12 posted on 08/26/2008 2:48:37 PM PDT by WatchYourself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4412

Comments like yours make my blood boil. Since when are conservatives looking at someone based on factors other than how well he or she can do the job? Why should someone be vetoed as a prospective running mate for McCain simply because he was born to a white Christian family?


13 posted on 08/26/2008 2:51:23 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

My only problem with Cantor is the lack of a varied ticket. Two lawmakers already make up the Democratic ticket. Where is the executive experience?

Second, what does Cantor bring to the electoral table? Jewish voters? Doubtful. Women? Probably not. Being conservative is great, but being conservative on a ticket that loses is useless.


14 posted on 08/26/2008 2:53:21 PM PDT by WatchYourself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
Comments like yours make my blood boil. Since when are conservatives looking at someone based on factors other than how well he or she can do the job?

From the set of qualified people, choose the one most likely to help win the election. It's like looking for geographical balance on the ticket.

15 posted on 08/26/2008 2:57:35 PM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Cantor will bring this campaign the enthusiasm our side is truly lacking. If the race was a dead heat before, imagine if McCain gave us a running mate we could get excited about.

Here’s a game. Put yourself in the shoes of a Democrat and find ways to attack Romney. Easy (old, flip flopper, rich white guy, health care plan similar to Obama’s, creepy). No do the same for Pawlenty (boring, horrible debator). Now Cantor. (crickets chirping)


16 posted on 08/26/2008 2:59:10 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (McCain/Cantor '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

...Eric Cantor is a relentless and confident debater. He has proven during his interviews with Chris Matthews, Laura Ingraham, and CNN’s John Roberts that he can masterfully defend conservative positions without even blinking an eye. He can also effectively attack his opponents when prompted. Cantor would be a thorn in the Obama Campaign’s side.....

Pawlenty and Cantor would be inoffensive selections for McCain. Tim Pawlenty is an Evangelical Christian and Eric Cantor is Jewish. Both of them are pro-life. Eric Cantor’s voting record in Congress earned him a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee and a 0% rating from NARAL.....

ERIC CANTOR!!!


17 posted on 08/26/2008 3:01:41 PM PDT by Renah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I think it may well be Cantor. All of the other trial balloons that have been floated have been greeted with negative reaction by various factions within the party. The only negative reaction to Cantor has been that he’s relatively unknown. That problem will be solved once he’s nominated.


18 posted on 08/26/2008 3:01:42 PM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
Boldness here would pay off

I agree. Palin or Cantor. We need young, dynamic conservatives who embrace all three legs of the conservative stool. Because of Palins persoanl story she would energize pro life youth like nobody has ever done before.

Cantor is also young, dynamic, pro life and exceptionally bright.

I'm with you here. Go bold!

19 posted on 08/26/2008 3:04:11 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Obama (Marxist), Manchuria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

I guess I don’t get what there is to be excited about Cantor.

What I’ve seen of him is ... b o r i n g.

I think there are plenty of people out there able to get Conservatives excited (and I think McCain is actually doing a good job if this now anyway).


20 posted on 08/26/2008 3:04:41 PM PDT by WatchYourself (McCain/Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson