Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

While there's no question that we must not allow a Bambi into the Oval Office, there's also no question that we must hold McCain accountable for his liberal positions - abortion, "comprehensive immigration reform," "globull warming," etc.

Opinion: a McCain/Ridge or a McCain/Guiliani (McRidge or McRudy)?

(MM's site is notorious for causing images in posts to not appear - if you're seeing red x's I recommend going to the link to view them - so in advance I say 'sorry!')

1 posted on 08/19/2008 9:45:40 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: the anti-liberal
there's also no question that we must hold McCain accountable for his liberal positions

The only way you have to do this is to not vote for him.

2 posted on 08/19/2008 9:48:20 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

I wonder if Michelle hasn’t jumped the shark. She’s beginning to sound old and bitter.


3 posted on 08/19/2008 9:48:20 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

“Is McCain going to screw conservatives (again)?”

What a silly question. OF COURSE he is!

Maybe not on THIS issue, but he WILL screw us (again).


4 posted on 08/19/2008 9:48:40 AM PDT by WayneS (What the hell is wrong with these people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

I got dibs on being the first to say “You knew what you were getting when you voted for him”.


5 posted on 08/19/2008 9:48:40 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting Conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

Is McCain going to screw conservatives (again)?

I have no reason to think he won’t. He tends to do that a lot and he’s fairly good at it.


6 posted on 08/19/2008 9:49:26 AM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

I still do not believe this will happen. McCain/Pawlenty continues to seem a likely ticket to me.

If John Kasich is willing, that’s another possibility.


7 posted on 08/19/2008 9:49:56 AM PDT by freespirited (Honk if you miss Licorice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

ping


8 posted on 08/19/2008 9:50:24 AM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

You can probably count that McCain will screw us 20% of the time. Obama will screw us 100% of the time. In the end, McCain will be better than Bush, IMHO. Except I doubt if it will even be possible for McCain to get any good judges appointed to the court unless the GOP pulls off some kind of miracle in the Senate.


9 posted on 08/19/2008 9:51:23 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

McCain is a RINO. Duh. But he is a liberal republican. If I were voting without a conscience, as I used to, I would vote for the lesser of these two evils. But I’m not... :) Go Ron Go! Conscience clear.


13 posted on 08/19/2008 9:53:17 AM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

Its certain that McCain is a better choice than obama. But conservatives have to always hold his feet to the fire.

First chance he gets McCain will sell conservatives down the river.

The VP choice is a toughie. Obama is really of a piece with Gore and heinz’s husband. However, after three defeats the dems are likely to choose a new kind of democrat in the next presidential cycle. They’re putting Mark Warner up for keynote.

What kind of republican could beat warner. He is very much like Romney only his story is better.


16 posted on 08/19/2008 9:53:48 AM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal
Every solicitation I get from McCain (and there are a lot) goes straight to the trash. I know I am typical of a lot of conservatives in that regard. I'll vote for him, but that's it (even at that I'm renigging on prior statements).

Maybe our rejection just makes the guy even more "moderate"-- I don't know. In any event, it is what it is, and I am not going whole hog for McCain.

19 posted on 08/19/2008 9:55:30 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

I think this is not the time to risk losing votes for McCain.

On the issues you mentioned:

abortion - McCain is pro-life. He understands that the key is judges. What’s the problem here?

“comprehensive immigration reform” - can’t argue here

“globull warming” - I think he’s being purely political here and there’s no point for his campaign to take a stand against environmentalism. I cringed too when he mentioned it in the debates, but I’m certainly not going to drop my support over just this issue.


20 posted on 08/19/2008 9:56:15 AM PDT by Free Descendant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

McCain is liberal on immigration reform and controlling free speech, but he is not pro-abortion.

Malkin is a bit too busy lately seeing the negative, but I guess someone has to watch that angle.

Ridge would not get my support.


23 posted on 08/19/2008 9:59:05 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

I have been really agonizing over this presidential vote and have come up with the following analysis.
1. During the gang of 14 debacle I called McCain’s ofice and explained that I would never vote for him for anything.
2. I live in California and we will be one of the last states to send our electorial votes to the Republicans. I see my presidential vote as merely symbolic.
3. I am increasingly disturbed by the direction the Republican party is moving.

Therefore I will not vote for McCain but plan to vote for a conservative. Where do I find one? I put the Liberarians into the same basket as the Greens. So I need to look to the Constitution party or elsewhere. I would like to somehow express to the national (and state) party that conservatives are here and we do vote.

McCain has just thumbed his nose at conservatives too many times.


25 posted on 08/19/2008 9:59:21 AM PDT by rbbeachkid (When is enough enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

If McCain picks a pro-choice VP, I’ll choose to not vote for him in November.


26 posted on 08/19/2008 9:59:59 AM PDT by airborne (American by birth! Christian by choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal
I've been waiting for the VP pick to make up my mind about McCain.

If he picks a pro-abort, it's a no brainer. Find me the nearest third party not headed by Bob Barr.

If he picks a pro-lifer (and not a phony one like Flip Romney), I'm in with both feet.
33 posted on 08/19/2008 10:03:02 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal
Is McCain going to screw conservatives (again)?

Is the Pope Catholic?

40 posted on 08/19/2008 10:05:26 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals? FREE LAZAMATAZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal
Not sure it matters. The VP does not pick justices and does not sign bills into law. And if McCain is elected and passes away in office, a pro-abortion VP is still only going to be able to dlea with legislation that the congress sends up.

If McCain wins he will be working with a house and senate with a makeup pretty much like exists today - Dems may strengthen their majorities slightly, but not to a supermajority. Is that congress going to be able to send a powerfully pro-abortion bill (or a powerfully anti-abortion bill) up to the president? I doubt it.

This just seems like a tempest in a teapot. McCain is a pro-life senator, and would be a pro-life President, but he's not likely to be able to do much to advance the issue in either direction. The good news here is, congress is not likely to be able to do much harm, unless there is a much much larger pro-Dem blowout than what is anticipated.

43 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:08 AM PDT by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal

Rush is talking about this today. The only chance Barak Obama has of becoming President is if John McCain selects a pro-choice running mate like Ridge or Leiberman. That’s why the RAT media is promoting them.

McCain should find out which one of his campaign operatives are making these calls and fire him. Of course, Ridge is co-chairman of the campaign. So it could be Ridge who’s making the calls.


44 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:10 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the anti-liberal
Griping here does nothing. Take action. Even if it is a bogus rumor, it can't hurt for Conservatives to flex our muscles and remind McCain where votes and funding come from.
46 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:54 AM PDT by mnehring (http://www.heyobamababy.com/obama_baby_cool_cat.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson