Skip to comments.
Barack Obama Says Pro-Life Group Lying About His Pro-Infanticide Votes
LifeNews.com ^
| August 17, 2008
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 08/17/2008 5:40:50 PM PDT by SErtelt
Barack Obama Says Pro-Life Group Lying About His Pro-Infanticide Votes
Washington, DC -- Barack Obama has some harsh words for a leading pro-life group that has exposed his misrepresentations about his votes against two bills that would have stopped infanticides. Obama goes as far as saying the National Right to Life Committee is lying about his record.
At issue are votes Obama cast against a bill that would have made sure babies who survive botched abortions get adequate medical care.
Read the complete story: http://www.LifeNews.com/nat4142.html
(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; barackobama; bornalive; infanticide; nrlc; obama; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: SErtelt
21
posted on
08/17/2008 6:16:33 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(My friends, I am voting against Obama because he is white.)
To: SErtelt
Hussein’s own words (on many occasions) are devasating.
22
posted on
08/17/2008 6:22:46 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: SErtelt
Barack Obama Says Pro-Life Group Lying About His Pro-Infanticide Votes"They're lying, and, and they're just... just... RACIST!"
23
posted on
08/17/2008 6:22:48 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: hope
The man is a fool betting his voters are even bigger fools
he would win that vote
24
posted on
08/17/2008 6:24:19 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: uncbob
LOL...They are like minded fur sure!
25
posted on
08/17/2008 6:26:35 PM PDT
by
hope
To: Salvation; All
Obama chooses death for Babies, over PROBABLY crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality,
State of Illinois
92nd General Assembly
Regular Session
Senate Transcript March 30, 2001
Page 87
http://www.ilga.gov/senate/transcripts/strans92/ST033001.pdf
And if were placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as as is necessary to keep that child alive, then were probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality.
26
posted on
08/17/2008 6:26:57 PM PDT
by
Son House
( [ ]Obama=>LoseBothWars/Raise Taxes [X]McCain=>WinBothWars/CutPorkBarrelSpending)
To: SErtelt
If the Messiah supports abortion, then where's the beef?
This is what I don't understand with pro-abortionists. If you support abortion, why try to hide it, deny it, attack the pro-life side, or try to "moderate" it into something that it's not?
You're either pro-abortion or you're pro-life. There is no middle ground here and this is proof that Obama shouldn't be elected on some village water board, let alone President of the US.
To: SErtelt
28
posted on
08/17/2008 6:33:17 PM PDT
by
South40
To: SErtelt
To: JustaCowgirl
He sure has accused alot of people/groups of lying lately.
To: NonValueAdded
But I doubt it will blow up in his face with his flock. Not with his most devoted flock, but that flock can't get him elected by themselves.
I think undecideds who make up the majority, particularly away from the coasts, are turning away from him in droves because of this kind of thing.
God willing, he will lose this election by the landslide he so richly deserves.
To: SErtelt
“I voted against murdering babies before I voted in favor of murdering babies.”
To: SErtelt
Barack Obama Says Pro-Life Group Lying About His Pro-Infanticide VotesThat's right, eeeverybody's lying but Barack. Even pro abortion groups such as NARAL didn't oppose the Illinois Bill specifically because of language that he claims isn't there. Funny that I don't see those groups coming to his aid if his claim was true, i.e., it undermines ROEvWADE...and if NRLC is correct, that he presided of the committee that inserted this key language he claims isn't there, then he'll look like the jackass that he is...except, of course, to other jackasses, which there are many in this country...
33
posted on
08/17/2008 8:28:39 PM PDT
by
csense
To: csense
...presided over the committee...
34
posted on
08/17/2008 8:31:35 PM PDT
by
csense
To: atomicweeder
I voted against murdering babies before I voted in favor of murdering babies.I got the same impression from reading the article...that much of his explanation sounded Kerryish. I'm surpised the man can dress himself in the morning since he doesn't seem to have an original thought in that waste of space he calls a brain.
35
posted on
08/17/2008 8:37:38 PM PDT
by
csense
To: SErtelt
So the black racist accuses people of lying while he refuses to acknowledge that he is a pathological liar himself?
This loser is unbelievable!
36
posted on
08/18/2008 12:19:44 AM PDT
by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: Son House
"And if were placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as as is necessary to keep that child alive, then were probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality"
The tortured syntax, the dubious rhetoric, and the moral incoherence are all utterly unmistakable to even a modestly well-tuned ear.
37
posted on
08/18/2008 3:19:47 AM PDT
by
Tenniel2
("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" -- W.F. Buckley)
To: Tenniel2
"And if were placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as as is necessary to keep that child alive, then were probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality"
Notice also how this goon doesn't even bother to think through what "viability" means. It cannot mean "live unaided on its own" because no full term infant is capable of that. It simply means that instead of being totally dependent on one person, the mother, it can be totally dependent on a variety of people. To judge whether it has a claim to life based on who can take care of it is insane or just an excuse to be able to eliminate it. "Honey, I know that I'm holding you by your hand over the cliff's edge and that if I wait just a little bit longer others can take over the job. I also know that if I were to let you drop when others could take over the job I'd be guilty of murder, but since they're not here yet, I'm fully justified in letting you take the fall, even if they're just moments away. Oh, and if you survive the fall, well, since I didn't want to keep holding on, no one else should be able to come to your rescue." This is Obama's position.
38
posted on
08/18/2008 3:42:43 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: SErtelt
When you read the whole case, it is obvious that it is he barack mcgovern who is the liar. The more he whines the more people who care about life will read and the more it will hurt this lying bag of shiite.
39
posted on
08/18/2008 5:11:29 AM PDT
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: Caleb1411
"We now challenge Obama to either declare the two 2003 legislative documents to be forgeries and call for an official investigation, or else apologize for his four years of misrepresentation on the issue of babies who are born alive during abortions -- and for calling us liars." Don't bet on seeing that definitive rebuttal anytime soon.
40
posted on
08/18/2008 6:40:36 AM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson