Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Supporters: Are You Happy Now?
US News ^
| 8/15/08
| Morgan E. Felchner
Posted on 08/16/2008 5:19:31 PM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last

So Morgan is a babe. Despite that, she may have a point.
A female-on-female disagreement. And which red-blooded American male doesn't enjoy this? I can't think of one.
To: Libloather
..will it do anything to satisfy Clinton's supporters? If it gets her elected, you bet.
2
posted on
08/16/2008 5:21:33 PM PDT
by
Mediocrates
(Teens don't 'need' to know 40 year-old music. Boomers need to get over the Beatles et al.)
To: Libloather
no, they are not appy.
there are boomer and older women that want a female president before they die.
3
posted on
08/16/2008 5:21:33 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: Libloather
I read that Clinton doesn’t want it. Obama wants the floor vote - to humiliate Hillary. That sounds pretty standard for his playbook.
4
posted on
08/16/2008 5:21:50 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Libloather
“A female-on-female disagreement. And which red-blooded American male doesn’t enjoy this? I can’t think of one.”
Have you seen the liberal females? We’re not talking Ann Coulter v. Sarah Palin here.
5
posted on
08/16/2008 5:25:23 PM PDT
by
REDWOOD99
To: Libloather
I still think there's going to be a major disruption.
The PUMA and Denver Group folks have made it quite clear they do NOT like BHO as their candidate, and that there are still 173 delegates who have not yet cast their votes.
...Pass the popcorn.
6
posted on
08/16/2008 5:27:39 PM PDT
by
T Lady
(The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
To: livius
I read that Clinton doesnt want it. Obama wants the floor vote - to humiliate Hillary.
How many segments of the Dem party does he want to p*ss-off?
7
posted on
08/16/2008 5:35:20 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: REDWOOD99
Have you seen the liberal females? Were not talking Ann Coulter v. Sarah Palin here.Would that be a cage match - or - mud wrestling?
It really does matter...
8
posted on
08/16/2008 5:37:46 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(August is Liberal Awareness Month.)
To: Libloather
Smith, Chisholm and Clinton.
So it’s the women who get this “awwww, you lost” treatment?
Why is that?
9
posted on
08/16/2008 5:38:56 PM PDT
by
fightinJAG
(Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
To: Libloather
Libs - cage (and not just for the match)
us - Baby Oil!
To: ken21
11
posted on
08/16/2008 5:42:19 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
(No Comment)
To: Libloather
“Obama supports this for the sake of unity, saying he hopes it will help bring the party together.”
Another indicia of how totally clueless this man is. Better he get blind sided now by Hillary than later by Putin or Ahmadinejad.
12
posted on
08/16/2008 5:43:43 PM PDT
by
Spok
(Whatever you say about McCain, it must be admitted that he's no B. Hussein Obama.)
To: REDWOOD99
It's going to take every fiber in Hillary's body to hold back the anger and pain she has about her party not crowning her Queen when she makes her speech at the convention. She will take great satisfaction from insuring Obama's defeat in the general..
13
posted on
08/16/2008 5:48:12 PM PDT
by
kempo
To: livius
Oh please, Don’t throw me in the Briar Patch, Mr. Bear. This can and will hurt BHO.
14
posted on
08/16/2008 5:55:25 PM PDT
by
Steamburg
(Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
To: Libloather
She is going to do the coup. It is going to be excellent television to watch. Get your popcorn. And tape it.
15
posted on
08/16/2008 6:24:46 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Libloather
The primary process is flawed in both major parties.
16
posted on
08/16/2008 6:26:54 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
To: Army Air Corps
He’s so arrogant he doesn’t care. Remember, this is the guy who rented the 75,000 seat stadium for the victory speech for the victory he hadn’t even won yet...and has people being bussed in from all over the country for it, just to make sure the Dems are scared enough not even to think of nominating anybody else.
17
posted on
08/16/2008 6:28:53 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Steamburg
I don’t think so. I believe that the Dems are genuinely scared of him, but now they’re stuck with him. I think he’ll lose, but at this point, I think she’d lose, too, even if they somehow could nominate her at the last minute. She would have been the stronger candidate and probably McCain would now have been way behind her in the polls. It’s good for us, but on the whole, it seems to me that Barry has the Dems seriously messed up.
18
posted on
08/16/2008 6:33:47 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Libloather
Have you seen the liberal females? Were not talking Ann Coulter v. Sarah Palin here.
Would that be a cage match - or - mud wrestling?
It really does matter... In keeping with Hillary's sense of style, I nominate COLESLAW. But somebody's gotta go wand the vat with a metal detector first. No telling what a Hillraiser might stash in that thing for her to use on her opponent.
19
posted on
08/16/2008 6:34:15 PM PDT
by
Titan Magroyne
("Drill now drill hard drill often and give old Gaia a cigarette afterwards she deserves it." HerrBlu)
To: livius
True. His narcissism is his Achilles heel. Oh, wait, his blithering lack of economic policy knowledge is his Achilles heel. No, wait, it is his lack foreign policy experience... :-)
20
posted on
08/16/2008 6:35:37 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson