Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist challenges ‘In God We Trust’(We need to Freep the survey!)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10103424/ ^

Posted on 08/14/2008 10:30:48 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants

SAN FRANCISCO - An atheist who has spent four years trying to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from being recited in public schools is now challenging the motto printed on U.S. currency because it refers to God. Michael Newdow seeks to remove “In God We Trust” from U.S. coins and dollar bills, claiming in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that the motto is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion....

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antitheist; churchandstate; firstamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Devilinbaggypants
Is Michael Newdow running out of money? This must be his latest personal fund raising effort for his godless donors.
41 posted on 08/14/2008 11:31:04 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Exactly - the Secular Humanists have figured out how use the government to impose their religion on the rest of us.

Really? When did the storm troopers come and close your church, Mr. B? Are you jailed for your beliefs?

This canard that you have had anyone's religion shoved down your throat is just that, a canard.

42 posted on 08/14/2008 11:32:25 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Are you going to show your ignorance by denying the Secular Humanist indoctrination in public schools?

Case in point - man in Lexington KY dared to question the homosexual agenda indoctrination in his kindergartner’s classroom,

and WAS jailed as a result.

And, what would happen if someone dared mention God in schools these days? Fired. Lawsuit. etc.

Secular Humanism IS being shoved down everyone’s throat, and it has gov’t guns to back it up.


43 posted on 08/14/2008 11:37:43 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dmz

And living in terror all the while Fur Shur.


44 posted on 08/14/2008 11:51:38 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

And living in terror all the while Fur Shur.
_______

No terror here for this agnostic. I’ve got my speech already prepared for Peter should I have the chance to speak to him.

I’m in good stead vis a vis the 10 commandments (at least those that were not included at the behest of the religious authorities), so what? me worry? Not a chance.


45 posted on 08/14/2008 11:57:52 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Devilinbaggypants

This nameless nutjob obviously has a lot of free time on his hands...


46 posted on 08/14/2008 12:09:52 PM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ericc4
Good point.I've never bashed an atheist, nor any religion other than mine.

It is the nutjobs of all religions and anti-religions that I can't stand.
Their insanity is simply unacceptable when it becomes mindless intrusive activism, serving no purpose other than their own ego.

47 posted on 08/14/2008 12:12:58 PM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrB

so did we ever get a basis for the morality of an athiest? i have always wondered that too


48 posted on 08/14/2008 2:00:51 PM PDT by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sloop

I guess it’s whatever their “reason” and “intellect” tell them is right in any particular situation, ie, situational ethics.

After all, there is no objective standard since there is no objective source.


49 posted on 08/14/2008 2:04:04 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MrB
sowell calls the collective knowledge of people the ‘wisdom of the ages’ - i’d like to see a comparison of the success and achievements of countries centered around different religions and atheism - seems we have done well historically - maybe we should stick with it
50 posted on 08/14/2008 2:14:03 PM PDT by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sloop

I have something that I often say -

in order to be a leftist, you not only have to believe that you are wiser than anyone who ever lived
(rejecting traditional values, endorsing socialism which has never worked because you think you can do it right)

you have to believe yourself wiser than God Himself
(rejection of Biblical truth)

This applies to atheists as well.


51 posted on 08/14/2008 2:17:48 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MrB
again with the sowell thing - he calls them anointed and their philosophy, vision

despite evidence to the contrary, they believe they can implement their ideas (vision) where everyone else in history has failed

i have always wanted an atheist to explain the basis for their morality - the only thing i can come up with is the law - which i thought needed some kinda basis also (laws)

52 posted on 08/14/2008 2:34:21 PM PDT by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sloop

I’ve read a lot of Sowell, including Vision of the Anointed, though Conflict of Visions was a better intro to the thought processes.

All decisions and viewpoints are a function of your presuppositions, and they can be pretty much divided by the two starting points of

“In the beginning, God”
and
“In the beginning, nothing”

CS Lewis, in Mere Christianity, discusses the common morality, sense of justice, and the need to worship inherent in us created beings.

My take:
Atheists are inherently arrogant, and assume that their intellect is the source of this inherent sense of morality and justice, and their need to worship is satisfied in worshiping themselves or the state.


53 posted on 08/14/2008 2:42:44 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MrB
...the need to worship inherent in us created beings.

i wholehearted agree with that statement - and see the evidence in the way the atheist looks to government to fulfill that need (or shopping - or sex - or science - or anything except a religion)

54 posted on 08/14/2008 2:54:22 PM PDT by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson