Posted on 08/14/2008 10:30:48 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants
SAN FRANCISCO - An atheist who has spent four years trying to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from being recited in public schools is now challenging the motto printed on U.S. currency because it refers to God. Michael Newdow seeks to remove In God We Trust from U.S. coins and dollar bills, claiming in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that the motto is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion....
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Really? When did the storm troopers come and close your church, Mr. B? Are you jailed for your beliefs?
This canard that you have had anyone's religion shoved down your throat is just that, a canard.
Are you going to show your ignorance by denying the Secular Humanist indoctrination in public schools?
Case in point - man in Lexington KY dared to question the homosexual agenda indoctrination in his kindergartner’s classroom,
and WAS jailed as a result.
And, what would happen if someone dared mention God in schools these days? Fired. Lawsuit. etc.
Secular Humanism IS being shoved down everyone’s throat, and it has gov’t guns to back it up.
And living in terror all the while Fur Shur.
And living in terror all the while Fur Shur.
_______
No terror here for this agnostic. I’ve got my speech already prepared for Peter should I have the chance to speak to him.
I’m in good stead vis a vis the 10 commandments (at least those that were not included at the behest of the religious authorities), so what? me worry? Not a chance.
This nameless nutjob obviously has a lot of free time on his hands...
It is the nutjobs of all religions and anti-religions that I can't stand.
Their insanity is simply unacceptable when it becomes mindless intrusive activism, serving no purpose other than their own ego.
so did we ever get a basis for the morality of an athiest? i have always wondered that too
I guess it’s whatever their “reason” and “intellect” tell them is right in any particular situation, ie, situational ethics.
After all, there is no objective standard since there is no objective source.
I have something that I often say -
in order to be a leftist, you not only have to believe that you are wiser than anyone who ever lived
(rejecting traditional values, endorsing socialism which has never worked because you think you can do it right)
you have to believe yourself wiser than God Himself
(rejection of Biblical truth)
This applies to atheists as well.
despite evidence to the contrary, they believe they can implement their ideas (vision) where everyone else in history has failed
i have always wanted an atheist to explain the basis for their morality - the only thing i can come up with is the law - which i thought needed some kinda basis also (laws)
I’ve read a lot of Sowell, including Vision of the Anointed, though Conflict of Visions was a better intro to the thought processes.
All decisions and viewpoints are a function of your presuppositions, and they can be pretty much divided by the two starting points of
“In the beginning, God”
and
“In the beginning, nothing”
CS Lewis, in Mere Christianity, discusses the common morality, sense of justice, and the need to worship inherent in us created beings.
My take:
Atheists are inherently arrogant, and assume that their intellect is the source of this inherent sense of morality and justice, and their need to worship is satisfied in worshiping themselves or the state.
i wholehearted agree with that statement - and see the evidence in the way the atheist looks to government to fulfill that need (or shopping - or sex - or science - or anything except a religion)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.