Posted on 08/08/2008 11:57:31 AM PDT by JennysCool
Yeah, thanks — they are both glowing brightly for that photo — must have been a rather ‘hot’ book tour for Edwards to have his new mistress at his beck and call — and she was getting paid $114,000 by the campaign to spend 6 months on the tour with him? She was the official videographer for such big bucks??? Cozy deal for both I’d say.......
The skank told the reporter that the affair STARTED WHEN HIS WIFE WAS IN REMISSION.
WAPOS! Like that makes it alright.
There may be plenty of other photos of the two of them, if only more of the MSM will bother to scour their files..... the ones they could not bother to look at when this story first broke last year...... sure, she was just the official campaign videographer.......
Photo Shows Edwards, Hunter Together At Dallas Tour Stop
http://www.nbc5i.com/news/17138132/detail.html
POSTED: 6:13 pm CDT August 8, 2008
UPDATED: 6:32 pm CDT August 8, 2008
FORT WORTH, Texas — A photograph taken by an NBC 5 employee shows former presidential candidate John Edwards with his videographer, Rielle Hunter, 42, on a stop in Dallas in 2006.
The pair were in North Texas during Edwards’ book tour.
Edwards, who won praise and sympathy as he campaigned side-by-side with his cancer-stricken wife, Elizabeth, admitted Friday he had had an extramarital affair with Hunter.
Hunter was working for Edwards producing videos for his campaign.
Yes, the Dem Convention has just been sexed up; and with a teaser: "I am not the father".
This whole thing is just too darned trite. It couldn't have happened more perfectly to take any and everyone's eyes off the dem "fallout" between their special interest groups and coalitions.
But.. whoever wrote that for John Edwards really screwed up making Miss Rielle out to be the cause of his "downfall" and the "other guy". Dems are thinking this'll be an empowerment message. Perhaps that's what they wished; but rule #1: You don't slam single women. And Edwards just did.
The "strategists" protected the married couples (Clinton, Edwards, Baracks) and basically implied that single mothers would get cash, nice cash each month but they had to agree to take the fall as the "problem" and cause.
I'd have given my eyeteeth to have quietly observed those discussions and transactions behind the scenes.
Butonna is the way we say it with our NY accent.
As far as I can figure, this is a resume enhancer for a Democrat; it's so European.
What a pathetic con artist.
Is that really the headline, or did you fake that...? Sorry, but I don’t believe ABC called him Liberal.
What a pathalogical lier.
Grover Cleveland, wasn't it?
Anti-Grover Cleveland political cartoon of 1884 (cropped), recounting the story that he had had an illegitimate child (giving rise to the infamous campaign chant "Ma, Ma, where's my Pa? Gone to the White House, Ha! Ha! Ha!").
Well I have the title for the Hollywood movie that should be made about the downfall of John Edwards with his hot video-cam mistress:
“SEX, LIES, AND VIDEOTAPE”
I think my original headline was simply “Edwards Admits Affair” in the interest of speed in posting. It’s been added to by the mods during the course of the day.
That is a very good and valid point.
The journalist want to be just an observer when it comes to watching the Taliban execute women, but when it suits their fancy, influence the world politics.
4 innocent children.
you said it Spunky...
You forgot to add Newt Gingrich, as sad as that makes me.
ROFLOL...... Oh, my..... John Edwards and Chris Matthews going on about how awful it was that Ann Coulter did not express shame...... the irony is too rich...... maybe the lying huckster John Edwards can spend some time and energy expressing his own SHAME for awhile now......
MATTHEWS: Elizabeth had one — I think Elizabeth may have made one strategic error last night. That’s assuming that she could get Ann Coulter to express shame.
J. EDWARDS: I don’t think she has any shame. There’s no doubt about that. And her response to any effort to raise the dialogue, to talk about things that people care about, is to attack in a mean, hateful, mean-spirited way. I think that’s just the way she behaves. That’s who she is. And I think that’s a lot of what we see from these people who are just — that are crazy. I mean...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
J. EDWARDS: I mean, there’s nothing remotely mainstream about them. And normal people are repelled by them.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/06/27/245585.aspx
In the next segment they are going to ask him what else is out there on this story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.