Posted on 08/07/2008 10:15:27 AM PDT by pissant
‘We’re working off our timetable, not yours,” says David Perel, editor of The National Enquirer. “I’m not letting other media drive the story for us.”
Perel is talking about the issue of whether the Enquirer should have published, by now, photos of a July 22 confrontation in a Los Angeles hotel between its reporters and former Sen. John Edwards. Edwards had, the Enquirer reported, come to the Beverly Hilton to see a woman named Rielle Hunter, with whom he has had an affair and a baby. In an almost surreal scene described on the Enquirer’s website, Edwards was said to have fled to a men’s room, pushing against a door while the reporters pushed and asked questions from the other side.
By now, it’s well known that the big news outlets — the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, as well as the broadcast and cable networks — have largely ignored the story. Some observers have speculated that those outlets would report the news if the Enquirer published the pictures. And now, sure enough, Perel has published a picture — just one, a fuzzy image the Enquirer calls a “spy photo,” of a man who appears to be Edwards holding a baby. The paper says it was taken inside the Beverly Hilton room in which Edwards met with Hunter.
What is a spy photo? I ask Perel.
“That’s a good question,” he says, without answering.
“Was it taken surreptitiously?”
“Well, it’s not a photo that he handed out, let’s put it that way,” Perel answers. He declines to say who took the picture or under what precise circumstances.
We’ll see if the new photo changes any minds at the big media institutions. It’s more likely that editors and reporters who don’t want to report the story will continue to not report the story, perhaps saying the picture is not clear enough. And Perel says he doesn’t care; he’s concerned with the Enquirer’s story and the Enquirer’s timetable.
But just what is that timetable? “There are a lot of factors that go into it,” Perel tells me. For one thing, the Enquirer has been closely watching Edwards and the Edwards camp for reaction. “We learned a lot the first time around,” Perel says, referring to Edwards’s denials of Enquirer reporting. Edwards called the July 22 story “tabloid trash,” said he didn’t know anything about it, and avoided reporters who wanted to know more. But he didn’t deny it.
Last December, when the Enquirer first named Hunter, Edwards did deny it. A couple of months earlier, when the Enquirer published a thinly-sourced story claiming that Edwards was “caught in a shocking mistress scandal that could wreck his campaign,” Edwards quite emphatically denied it. “The story is false,” he said then. “It’s completely untrue, ridiculous. Anyone who knows me knows that I have been in love with the same woman for 30-plus years.”
Since then, the Enquirer has reported that a man named Andrew Young, an Edwards aide, claimed that he, Young, is the father of the child (although the baby’s birth certificate lists no father). The Enquirer has reported that Edwards or his allies have made monthly payments to Hunter, supporting her first in North Carolina and now in California. And the tabloid has reported that Edwards or his allies relocated Young from North Carolina to California to support the story of his fatherhood. Continuing to develop that angle — most people would call it a cover-up — is, Perel says, part of the Enquirer timetable.
But is there anything else? Maybe the Democratic National Convention, coming up in a little more than two weeks? “Obviously, the convention has not been our driving force behind the story,” Perel says. “The reporting takes however long it takes. It took seven months to go from the December story to the [Beverly Hilton] meeting….But if it happens to be a happy coincidence — if the story just happens to be breaking around that time, in terms of maximum exposure —” Perel pauses. If the convention wasn’t part of the timetable before, it is now. The Edwards pictures might make a nice splash with the Democratic delegates gathered in Denver.
So the Enquirer continues to hold off on publication of the Beverly Hilton photos. And the big press outlets continue to stay away from the story, although the local Edwards press, like the Charlotte Observer, are moving closer to the story. In any event, more and more people know about it through the Internet — and now, late-night comics have been making their share of jokes about it. It’s all part of a phenomenon described by a headline in a Los Angeles gossip website, Deceiver: “John Edwards Anti-Scandal Continues to Not Continue.”
And so it will.
“National Enquirer” = Clintons.
FYI...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
"And if my wife ever finds out, she'll kill me."
If Edwards had been a Republican, how days of front page news would mainstream media have carried the story & photos? Makes a person wonder about the media biasness.
Groan! LOL!
Bah-Bah-Boom! ;-)
Yep - as I've obsessively said before, the Enquirer holds off it's photo evidence until their printed stories peak in publicity, furor and denials - (i.e. the Frank Gifford Scandal).
It’s pretty ironic when the National Enquirer has more journalistic integrity than the MSM!!
O’Reilly did a brief bit on it.
Love that statement all by itself. That's what real reporting ought to reflect, not look over everyone's shoulders to see if their copy looks the same for the same grade.
I've always said, regardless what some FReepers might think, the National Enquirer could run one heck of a PI school. PIs don't wait for someone to give them "hand outs" either for "pre approval".
I think it depends on which dem they are supporting. The MSM supports "The One". The NE supports Hillary. Not sure integrity has anything to do with it.
David Kendall, David Kendall.
Funny if they have a photo of Edwards bumping into Michelle Obama in the men’s room of that hotel
Probably waiting until convention week, to make the biggest splash. Olympic coverage will dominate the news for the next couple of weeks.
How long would it take for one reporter to investigate this story? But in our news media, if a reporter was sent to investigate, both the reporter and the editor would get reprimanded, if not fired.
I'm not sure when this story first appeared with John Edwards name on it. I'm thinking some time in October 2007. Edwards was holding his own with Hillary heading into the Iowa caucus.
Hillary needed to stop Edwards, probably hoping his supporters would turn to her.
IIRC Edwards quit soon after the Iowa caucus in January, 2008.
The Hunter woman worked for Edwards campaign and according to news reports admitted she had an affair with Edwards.
Now Hillary has one opponent to fight against. Obama.
Knowing the Clinton's, their power,dirty politics, connections and money it would not surprise me to learn Ms. Hunter was working for the Clinton campaign to wipe out John Edwards.
Edwards may be paying big dollars to Hunter, it's also possible she was well paid by the Clinton campaign for a job well done.
The Edwards/ Hunter story will be completed just in time to do Hillary the most good at the Denver convention. There may be no reason now for TNE to print "The rest of the Story". Edwards political future is over. .
Just my HO.
People keep missing the fact that Roger Altman — who served as deputy treasury secretary under Bill Clinton and is a top economic policy advisor to Hillary — owns the NE. SO...YEAH...expect the fotos to appear right as the Dim convention gets started...along with the “surprise” that BO can’t produce a legit COLB that won’t hurt his election chances. And it’s HILLARY! to the rescue.
This is SO fun to watch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.