Posted on 08/01/2008 7:15:03 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
Didja year about this one? Some maniac with a huge knife beheaded a man on a Greyhound bus in Canada. If you want a description of what happened, you can click here.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/global-video/index.html?video=2805319
When the attack occurred the other passengers abandoned ship. Hard to blame them. Who wants to rush this maniac with a knife when everyone can get away? I do have a question though. What if someone just one person on that bus had a concealed carry permit and was carrying a gun. How would things have been different?
There's a problem though. This is Canada. No guns. No carry permits. No way to save this victim.
Oh well.
**At least two threads have been deleted.** Why????
I wonder what this guy's nationality is?
“The trucker grabbed a crowbar....”
....might have been a Canadian trucker....a lot of American truckers keep stronger medicine than that in the cab.
China has it’s own muslim problem.
Still, it’s good to finally have a name.
Sheep.
It’s sounding more and more like Sudden Jihad Syndrome.
I used to ride greyhound when I was in college. Is there any worse place to go that a bus station? whether it be the port authority in NY, or station outside of St.Louis, why on earth are bus stations in the worst parts of town?
Not isolated. Be careful out there.
The mod who whacked them didn't confide in me.
I suspect the last one whacked yesterday was because there were already three running threads.
Yeah, I was thinking about Al Zarqawi too. By the way: I don’t think I will fall asleep in public transport in the upcoming 6 months or so...
Perhaps the killer was an envious insomniac?
Nice try troll, but it won't fly. All school shootings are done in no gun zones, they are also(except for the college shooting)done by teens who stoled the weapons they used. If we truly had the right to keep and bear arms the school shootings wouldn't have happened as one of the teachers would have been armed and would have taken the shooters out before they did too much damage.
When I was in school we used to bring our deer rifles to school and go hunting after class, no one ever got shot any where on any schools in the US at that time. Your statement is just a fine example of liberal thinking and, as I said, it won't fly.
Amazing! Canadian pacifists rushing out of the bus while there the overhead racks contained countless primitive weapons to subdue this one sicko. Shame on you sorryass pacivism, Canada.
Sounds like they might find some PCP in his system.
When I traveled I always had a knife or mace on me. I never trusted the people I was sitting next to, and made sure that I didn’t sleep on the bus.
Probably PC Anti-Truth Squad didn’t like the fact that the attacker is Asian. It’s considered racist to mention it, you know.
Thank you!
“Easygoing carnival worker.” Meaning a clown, of course.
Evil clown alert.
Usually, someone taking action is what prompts others, not asking them to help you.
They are linked to the fact that the perpetrators "bore arms", whether they should have or not. Criminals will get guns whether they are illegal or not, so their crimes aren't really related to that right.
It's the law-abiding who are affected by laws. They are the ones who are disarmed by anti-gun laws. It's because of those laws that there are more victims for the criminals to attack and kill without fear of an effective defense.
Had there been more armed citizens, each of those school shooting tragedies could have ended much more quickly, with fewer victims.
Imagine if some of the teachers in those schools were qualified and allowed to carry a concealed weapon. Can you see how the outcome could have been so much better? When only the police have effective defense against a gunman, then he knows he has lots of time to claim numerous lives before anyone will be able to stop him.
So: I dont really see a great advantage in widespread carrying of guns, because many people can go off the deep end by one of lifes many possible tragedies, and then go on a killing spree.
Exactly. That's precisely why there is an advantage to more widespread carrying of guns!
The bad guys will get their weapons in spite of the law, and more guns in the hands of the good guys mean it's more likely the bad guys will be stopped more quickly, or that they won't even attempt their crimes because of the higher likelihood of being shot in the process.
In the USA, at least, the areas with the strongest anti-gun laws are mostly the ones with the highest gun-related crime. Those laws don't stop the criminals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.