Why I'm Thanking God for Obama

American Thinker ^ | August 01, 2008 | Kyle-Anne Shiver

[vietvet67]

Every day, for the past several months, I've made a habit in my morning prayers of thanking God for the emergence of Barack Obama.  Not because my hope is in Obama, but because my hope is always, unequivocally in God.

As so many have noted, 2008 is not an ordinary American election.

Rather than two people with different policy positions vying for the President's job, we have one man who understands he's a mere mortal like the rest of us, and one man, who seems to think he is a god.

And y'all know what I'm talkin' about here. 

Many of Barack's followers manifest troubling signs of regarding him as at least a demigod.  Even while refraining from saying outright that they think he's a god, their belief comes through in the strange messianic iconography of their Obama-glorifying posters, videos and music.  Belief in the godlike nature of Barack's powers comes through in their faith in the vast promises he or his surrogates make about the change that's going to come about, not if, but when he becomes president, not just of our Country, but the whole darned world, oceans and all. Or so he seems to think.

The seas will recede.  The planet will heal.  Everyone will love America again.  The sick will all be cured by socialized medicine.  The poor will cease to exist.  The rich will give all their money to Africa.  The government will become efficient.  Sin won't happen.  The yellow brick road will lead to the White House, not a fantasy land.  And the Emperor's clothes will suddenly materialize so that the whole world will actually see something there.

The bottom line here is that Barack Obama does not seem to be running against John McCain. He seems to think he's too big for that.  As he told a roomful of Congressional Democrats this week, behind closed doors, he is no longer a mere man, he's "become a symbol of the possibility of America."  Considering the scope of the promises he is making and the hope he is offering not only America, but the rest of the world to boot, Barack Obama seems to be running against a far higher power than himself. 

Barack Obama actually appears to be running against God.  By claiming that he can do things only God can do, like heal "broken souls" and fill up "holes" in people's hearts, make all "divisions" go away and disperse with all inconvenient "distractions," Barack Obama claims power that no mortal man, and certainly no mere president has ever had, or ever will have, no matter how much money he has to spend or how brilliant or how able he may be. 

Most rational human beings know this without thinking hard.

That's why this isn't an ordinary election, and why it is becoming more absurd by the hour.

But this is a terrific opportunity for all of us mortal Americans who still love this Country and happen to think that our Founders were onto something quite exceptional in the history of human civilization.  This election will not pit Democrats against Republicans, but those who love America against those who just love Barack and think he is the one they've been waiting for to finally close the deal and secure their love for an America perfected by the politics of Barack Obama.

Utopian Claims that Materialize as Misery

For years now, I've occasionally fallen victim to discouragement over strides the rainbow Marxists have made in America and around the world.  The Berlin Wall was barely in its shallow grave before communism's sepulchral cries of resurgence began to be heard in places far and near.  The Soviet Block was barely broken before western Europeans began doing their best to emulate it and enshrine another form of it's tyranny by binding treaty.

The greatest single Marxist victory has been the systematic re-write of the movement's own bloody history, carried out by leftists in America and western Europe.  After WWII, Hitler's Germany was scrubbed clean of its National Socialist underpinnings, and entire generations have been told that Fascism was the polar opposite of Communism.  For the past eight years, with the new resurgence of American conservatism, leftists have bombarded the public from sympathetic press pulpits and university lecterns with their "Bush is Hitler" agitprop.  And a great many fools have swallowed this lie whole hog.

As Pope Benedict foretold in 2003, in his treatise on the sleeping ambitions of worldwide communism:

"Let us not forget that Marxism, as the one great political force of our twentieth century, made its appearance with the claim to be bringing a new world of freedom and of free people.  This very promise of knowing the scientifically guaranteed way to freedom, and of creating the new world, drew to it many of the boldest spirits of our age; ultimately it even appeared as the force through which the Christian teaching of redemption could be transformed into a realistic practical means for liberation - as the force that could bring the Kingdom of God as the true kingdom of men.  The collapse of realist socialism in the East European states has not quite laid aside all such hopes, and here and there they still subsist, silently awaiting some new form."
  -- Pope Benedict XVI; Truth and Tolerance; p. 233; emphases mine.

Just because this monstrous system puts on a new and younger face does not render it more benign.

Empty Resume, Empty Promises

Obama has arisen from nothingness, from one accomplishment-free political gig to another, propped up by leftists adulators and sycophants, to offer a perfect portrait of socialism's eternal snare.  Forget God; put your hope in mankind.  Human arrogance and narcissistic pride.  From the fall in the Garden to the present, from generation to generation, Satan's delusion holds sway with many.

Barack Obama is walking, talking, breathing narcissism.  The iconography of his campaign is nothing, if not the glorification of Obama, a solitary, quite mortal man.  They must glorify Obama's image because, in reality, he has no accomplishments that bear mention.

Obama struts his nothingness with grace; even his detractors admit that.

What could more openly and more amply demonstrate the absolute emptiness of socialism's promise than the perfectly empty resume of its newest hero?

What could possibly more adequately prove the personalized utopianism of his followers than that they believe in a man who has borne no fruitful action?

Barack Obama offers "collective salvation" in the form of socialist government interventions in every sphere of life, from starting-at-birth state education, to socialized, universal health care, to a tripling of the already failing AmeriCorps.   This socialist answer to all that ails mankind isn't anything new.  It's old, tried, and just as untrue now as in its beginning.

Beware the man who promises what man simply lacks the power to bestow.    

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it."
  -- H. L. Mencken

Time and time and time again, this has proven true.  Time and time again, new men arise in varying disguise, making the same promises, urging the same change.

God or Barack?  This ain't rocket science.

The lesson in socialism's long, failed and scandalous history is actually very simple, I think, not rocket science at all.

Life, as God created it, is basically unfair.

Beginning at the very reality that each human being is unique, without exact duplication anywhere, anytime.  Even in the case of identical twins, uniqueness begins at the moment of birth, as each twin experiences a separate reality in his or her environment.  With uniqueness comes individuality and at every moment of life, unfairness. 

No matter the measure one chooses, whether genetic beauty or physical strength, native intelligence or agility, inherited wealth or power, the benefits bestowed by one's parents or the lack of these.  In every single aspect of human life, no matter where one is born or what happens thereafter outside one's control, life is not fair.

I perceive that within the heart of every socialist lies an insurmountable resentment over this basic fact, which is always aimed squarely at God, who made things this way.  Arrogant man wants to be like God and design things his own way.   

Two thousand years ago, however, Jesus of Nazareth offered the eternal solution to the paradox of unfairness and inequality:

Speaking of God's judgment, Jesus said,

From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from the one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded.
  -- The Gospel of Luke 12:48 (New Revised Standard Version)

All who follow the same God, whether Jewish or Christian, see plainly that God's judgment has nothing whatsoever to do with one's station or gifts in this life, but only with what each individual does with what he is given.

It is certainly no accident that socialism has made its greatest advances among secular people, divorced from God by their own choice, and that today in America, it is the progressive secularists, the hardened socialists and communists, and many radical elements in our society that back Barack Obama's rise.  For many of these people, hope in God died long ago.

The salvation that Obama offers comes in the form of radically changing America to a utopian state, which he contends will fix our "broken souls." That simply is not within the province of his abilities.

As Pope Benedict has so wisely and emphatically stated:

Wherever politics tries to be redemptive, it is promising too much.  Where it wishes to do the work of God, it becomes, not divine, but demonic.
  -- Truth and Tolerance; p. 116

Barack Obama stands front and center now, offering the age-old false promise that mankind can save itself through "collective redemption," and simply because he employs Christian language and symbols, no genuine lovers of God will be fooled.

Hope in God?

Or hope in Obama?

I thank God every day for giving us Americans such a clear and easy choice.  Perhaps He is simply using Barack Obama to separate a bit of chaff from the grain.

Kyle-Anne Shiver is an independent citizen journalist and a frequent contributor to American Thinker.  She welcomes your comments at kyleanneshiver.com.   

[Matchett-PI]

Dennis Prager, like C.S. Lewis, is able to boil things down to their essence, that’s why I like to quote him.

Here’s another guy I like to quote:

“..The other day, I heard a brilliant analysis of Obama by Rush Limbaugh. He was pointing out that the reason he is reduced to such a stuttering prick (to quote Tommy DeVito) when off the teleprompter, is that he is a deeply divided person, either consciously or unconsciously (and undoubtedly both, in my opinion). He is the polar opposite of, say, Ronald Reagan, who always knew what he thought and could answer any question, for it was simply a matter of returning to first principles and applying them to the problem. Very scientific, if you will.

But one of the intrinsic problems in being a liberal is that you can never reveal your first principles, because if you explicitly articulate them, people will be repelled at what a contemptuous and supercilious asshat you are. Therefore, you must always couch them in terms of “compassion,” or “helping the little guy,” or “healing the planet,” or “unity,” or some other such blather. So in that regard, Obama is dealing with a more general problem that is intrinsic to liberalism, which is How to Fool the Idiots. One must be very cautious, because even the idiots are only so stupid. Thus Obama’s constant verbal ticks: “uh, uh, uh, let me, uh, say this, uh, uh, I’ve been completely, uh, consistent about this, blah blah blah.”

Being that liberalism is the political embodiment of multiplicity (or of an oppressive “bad unity” to try to heal it), it should not be surprising that its adherents are so intrinsically inconsistent. It’s not so much that they are dishonest, but that the whole ideology is dishonest — it is a lie from the ground up. Which is also why, the worse your character (or the less your intelligence), the better you will fare as a liberal politician, because you will be able to lie with great ease and even fool yourself.

Anyway, in Rush’s analysis, he was pointing out that Obama is running several campaigns simultaneously, and that it is obviously a struggle for him to keep them all straight in his head, thus the great difficulty in being consistent and giving straight answers. Because of this, he is always one gaffe away from a major meltdown.

For example, he’s running one campaign for blacks, but an entirely different one for whites. (I won’t even review the whole list, because it would take too much time, and I’ve already made my point; here is a list of the various irreconcilable positions which Obama must hopelessly try keep straight in his mind.)...

[....] To read more, go here: Wednesday, July 30, 2008
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8580258&postID=2994833775579019938

Click on the title at the top to expand the above commentary

[Gritty]

Good article.

[MrB]

But one of the intrinsic problems in being a liberal is that you can never reveal your first principles, because if you explicitly articulate them, people will be repelled at what a contemptuous and supercilious asshat you are.

I've said this... maybe not in so many words.. but I've said this for years.

It REALLY pisses off libs, too, when you say this. They try to continue to say that their principals ARE the cover.

But, we've seen them reveal themselves. Example - the CO2 scrubber that the enviros got so upset about because it "allows us to continue to use fossil fuels".

[jackv]

FTA - “Arrogant man wants to be like God and design things his own way.”

This is a very very good article. Thanks. It really sums up the adoration by the youth and socialist crowd. Very empty and yet so full of themselves.

[seekthetruth]

I didn't think Obama would have a chance of winning in November but beginning to worry. After talking to some of my DEM friends I realize that facts do not matter to them! They are totally in love with Obama’s “hope and change” and have absolutely NO idea about his stands on the issues or the damage his Marxism would do to our country! I also believe that if some“big super bad facts” came out about Obama’s character they wouldn't care and would STILL vote for him! Scary!!

[Matchett-PI]

Fear not. Obama-false-messiah is a God-send.

[Matchett-PI]

Oops! This is the link I meant to refer you to: Obama-false-messiah is a God-send

[Dr.Deth]

Rush intuitively picked up on this early on, and has hammered the whole “Messiah” schtick ever since.

[Dr.Deth]

There are only two religions when they’re boiled down to their essence:

[1] Those who believe that man is _basically good_ (innocent), even though he sometimes makes mistakes.

[2] Those who believe that man is _NOT basically good_ (innocent), even though he is capable of doing good in varying degrees.

I don't see where Islam fits into either. It proscribes men to do evil while calling it good.

[Matchett-PI]

"I don't see where Islam fits into either. It proscribes men to do evil while calling it good."

Catagory [1]

Only a person who believes he's basically good will think he may perform "works" -(of whatever his particular "faith" tell him are good)- in order to EARN favor with his god(s) and be rewarded with salvation (being 70 virgins, or [fill-in-the-blank with] whatever "reward" blows your skirts.

[MichaelAsher54]

Penetrating Insights into the Obvious

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

I have heard a third “religion” espoused, one that was the assumption of the founders of the United States. Not that man was good or bad, just that man is weak.

Throughout our constitution, this idea is reflected in the subdivision of power, the difficulty of creating new laws, and a clear list of rights the government shall leave alone, as they are natural, not given or taken away by government.

They knew that the constitution was not perfect, that it was written by imperfect men, not by heaven, and would need to be changed by imperfect men for changing times. They knew that there were good men and that there were bad men, but the vast majority are between the two.

Left to our own devices, most men are seldom bad. But when tempted, it is all too easy for the vast majority to become corrupted. But this as well is not a permanent state of being, except for the truly evil few.

Even abhorrent practices like slavery were rationalized as taking people from a truly evil state in Africa, and redeeming them with some education and religion. Alcohol prohibition was a foolish effort to make weak men good (possibly the war on drugs as well).

A standing army was hated and feared until WWII, because it might be used against the people by a weak willed tyrant. And isolationism was seen as protecting America from the iniquity found in the rest of the world.

Bad men, like Bill Clinton, have long proclaimed their goodness, yet can only be seen through the lens of weakness. Good men who likewise truly wanted to be good, have been so pressured by the expectations of goodness that they become corrupt, like Jimmy Swaggart. Likewise, to be seen through the lens of weakness.

[Matchett-PI]

Click my screen name and scroll down to “Emory Report” for the background on America’s founding principles.

America’s Framers held the biblical worldview that man is not _basically_ good.

The caution, “Caveat Emptor” (”Let the buyer beware”) isn’t borne from a belief in the basic goodness of ones fellow man.

[mad_as_he$$]

Mental masturbation. McCain will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

[Smokin' Joe]

Alcohol prohibition was a foolish effort to make weak men good (possibly the war on drugs as well).

I think the Temperence folks underestimated the strength of that weakness.

Man has always had a choice, even in the Garden.

[Matchett-PI]

On “Savior’s Day 2008 Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT9nYjqTL10
The “messiah” and “sign” stuff start at 8:52 it appears and goes on until the end. The “youth following the messiah” starts around 8:23.

*
Who is “Minister” Farrakhan & what is the Nation of Islam ( NOI )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_of_Islam

*
**** EXCLUSIVE: Must Cite Debbie Schlussel and/or DebbieSchlussel.com ****

An Obama Insider Reveals the Real Barack By Debbie Schlussel - Copyright 2008
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html

*
Obama Spokesmodel Pushes Reparations on Campaign Trail; Obama Doesn’t Negate Statement
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/04/obama_spokesmod.html

*
Obama supporter, Jim Wallis (Sojourners Magazine / “God’s Politics Blog”) is a Religious Left Leader whose profile is here: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1833

Wallis wrote this on his blog: “Slavery Apology - One Step Forward” [ towards reparations ]

“..Tuesday, for the first time, the U.S. House of Representatives passed an official apology for slavery and segregation. ..”
http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2008/07/slavery-apologyone-step-forwar.html#comments

*
The Religious Left’s Dalliance with Radical Islam By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, April 17, 2008
Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Dr. Earl Tilford, professor of history at Grove City College.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=23E79FA8-2A51-4917-A7A3-F1C01F1417E9

[...]

FP: You mentioned the Religious Left’s stance on America and the Evil Empire during the Cold War. Expand for us a bit.

Tilford: The Religious Left does not believe in evil. Rather, being semi-Pelagian, they believe in the essential goodness of humanity. Therefore, the Soviet Union was, in their minds, just a more advanced form of progressive socialism while the United States and the rest of the Free World were stuck in exploitative capitalism. The Soviet Union was no more to blame for the Cold War than the United States. They compared our efforts in Vietnam with the Soviet presence in Eastern Europe; that sort of thing. ..... The Religious Left is quintessentially Marxist in its thinking. ....

[...]

*
McCain campaign ad: “The One”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mopkn0lPzM8

*
Is he the anti-christ?: “He had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon”

“That one can’t be Dumbama. He wears a hollyweird halo and talks like an idiot.” ~ Arthur Wildfire! March
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2055302/posts?page=31#31

[Matchett-PI]

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

I’m honored by your quote and link. =]

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

I checked out the debbie schlussel pages. Compelling. Thank you again. FRegards...

[Matchett-PI]

"I’m honored by your quote and link. =]"

It is definitely a keeper. Funny as hell and quintessential truth at the same time. I hope you don't mind, but I will be posting that quote a lot between now and November. LOL bttt