Posted on 07/20/2008 6:15:28 PM PDT by Delacon
ping
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
No one expects the Green Inquisition.
The images of the classic Monty Phython skits aside, we need to understand that this analogy is dangerously close to the truth. The same DNA that produced the personalities that delivered all of the inhuman excesses of the Inquisition is still producing human beings today.
Rather than visiting the objects of their twisted minds on heretics and unbelivers of the One True and Catholic Faith, modern incarnations of these beasts impose their twisted view of the world on those who would deny the coming holocast caused by the evils of human excess and capitalism.
We have seen these lunatics before and have suffered their excesses when they held power. Will you empower these morons by supporting Obamalangadingdong or by foregoing your visit to the polls because McCain is not the perfect Conservative that you so hoped for? What will you do?
Dang, I was hoping the rising seas would sweep away the UN building.
“Dang, I was hoping the rising seas would sweep away the UN building.”
Hey, I never thought of that. LOL. We are all familiar with the litany of supposed BAD things that a warming of the globe will bring(human induced or not) yet there are many good things that will come with it if it happens. Add that one to the list.
“No one expects the Green Inquisition.”
Monty Python bump. The troupe were perfect in satirizing all that was ridiculous in society. Wish they were still performing and included global warming alarmism in their repertoire.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves" -- William Pitt
I know...MP used to do great sketches on such impossible amd improbable things; like the gay Anglican bishosps, for examp- Oh, wait a minute...
How many of you know about the PR CHALLENGE(PR stands for Paleoclimate Reconstruction
http://www.pages.unibe.ch/scirnce/prchallenge/index.hml
The main core of people of this group are the same one that gave us the “HOCKEY STICK” and how with a few new member of the “Team” they going to re-”con”-struct a new past climte if we let them.
Here is a letter I sent to my Senator:
Dear Sir;
You may be aware of the PR Challenge or Paleoclimate Reconstruction Challenge. http://www.pages.unibe.ch/science/prchallenge/index.html Many scientists of this group are the same scientists which give us the famous Hockey Stick reconstruction of our past climate. I should not have to remind you of the boondoggle surrounding the hockey stick starting with We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period to any input number resulted in the same graph being reconstructed.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
I demand as a tax payer and citizen that:
A) An independent audit done to validate and verify all works from Paleoclimate Reconstruction Challenge before any government body and/or government employee can refer to and/or use in full and/or in part for any government function including the IPCC.
B) If any government funding is used in all and/or part of this reconstruction, the reconstruction shall be subjected to the principle of forecasting as described in Principles of Forecasting handbook.
C) If any government funding is used in all or part of this reconstruction, the reconstruction shall be subjected to the Data Quality Act.
D) If scientist and/or institution that does not comply with independent audit and/or principle of forecasting and/or Data Quality Act shall have his and/or hers and/or institution government funding suspended immediately.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
“The rush towards [James Hansen promoted] bio-fuels has also strongly contributed to rising food prices, which have tipped another roughly 30 million people into starvation. Because of climate panic, our attempts to mitigate climate change have provoked an unmitigated disaster. We will waste hundreds of billions of dollars, worsen global warming, and dramatically increase starvation.” ~ Bjorn Lomborg
We should bring a tax-payers class-action suit against the reckless cynical opportunists responsible for hyping the anthropogenic GW hoax and causing so much mayhem here and around the world.
The main culprits have already been identified:
UK Watchdog finds [Channel 4 - The Great Global Warming Swindle] documentary was unfair to scientists but did not mislead viewers.
One of the scientists who filed the original complaint (Carl Wunsch) is from MIT - an important point in this mix, in light of what one of his MIT collegues (Kerry Emanuel) had to say, which I am copying and pasting below this excerpted preface:
..Channel 4 will still claim victory because the ultimate verdict on __a separate complaint about accuracy__, which contained 131 specific points and ran to 270 pages, will find that it did not breach the regulators broadcasting code and did not materially mislead viewers. ..
..The IPCC, King and other scientists including __Dr Carl Wunsch, a climate expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology__, complained to the regulator over the way they were represented. ...
..After the broadcast, Wunsch said the programme was masquerading as a science documentary when it should be regarded as a political polemic and was as close to pure propaganda as anything since world war two.
[[[ My interjection: That’s pretty funny in light of the fact that Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth, was determined by a UK court to be one-sided ‘extremist’ political propaganda and unfit to be shown to school children without disclaimers and equal time from ‘the other side’ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2047988/posts?page=8#8 ]]]
Wunsch claimed he had been duped into appearing and his comments had been misleadingly edited.
The Ofcom ruling is expected to find that Wunsch was misled about the tone and content of the programme, __but that his views were accurately represented within it__. .. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jul/19/channel4.climatechange
Now here is Kerry Emanuel of MIT (who made these remarks months and months ago):
.. The evolution of the scientific debate about anthropogenic [man-caused] climate change illustrates both the value of skepticism and the pitfalls of partisanship. .. Scientists are most effective when they provide sound, impartial advice, but their reputation for impartiality is severely compromised by the shocking lack of political diversity among American academics, who suffer from the kind of group-think that develops in cloistered cultures.
Until this profound and well documented intellectual homogeneity changes, scientists will be suspected of constituting a leftist think tank.
On the left, an argument emerged urging fellow scientists to deliberately exaggerate their findings so as to galvanize an apathetic public...
Conservatives have usually been strong supporters of nuclear power. .. Had it not been for green opposition, the United States today might derive most of its electricity from nuclear power, as does France; thus the environmentalists must accept a large measure of responsibility for todays most critical environmental problem. ~ Kerry Emanuel - MIT http://bostonreview.net/BR32.1/emanuel.html
*
Is Emanuels collegue, Carl Wunsch, one of those scientists on the left who was involved in deliberately exaggerating the science?
And from what I can determine, the Rev. Houghton may be another one of the scientists (mentioned by Kerry Emanuel above) who was involved in deliberately misleading / manipulating people. He even admits it:
The Reverend Sir John Houghton, former head of the UK Meteorological Office, Publisher of Al Gores book on GW and Former Co-Chair of the IPCC said:
Unless we announce disasters, no one will listen.
He then proceeds to do just that:
.. human induced global warming is a weapon of mass destruction at least as dangerous as chemical, nuclear or biological weapons that kills more people than terrorism.
~ John Houghton Monday July 28, 2003 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93466,00.html
*
James Hansen of NASA is another:
Hansen has long employed stagecraft http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDk2YjVlYTYzZjZkNTRhZWU2NGNkNzcwYTMzMmFlNGQ= for political gain. On June 23, 1988, he delivered his testimony in an unusually toasty hearing room.
Why was it so warm?
As then-Sen. Tim Wirth (D., Colo.), told ABCs Frontline: We went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right, so that the air conditioning wasnt working inside the room . . . it was really hot. June 27, 2008, 7:00 a.m. http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjQ2YTllODZiOTA0N2E2MTIzODQwNjUzMjQwYjI2MDI=
*
More first-hand admissions:
We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we may have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. ~ Stephen Schneider (leading advocate of the global warming theory) (in interview for Discover magazine, Oct 1989)
*
[Therefore] I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound. As the IPCC leadership has seen no wrong in Dr. Trenberths actions and have retained him as a Lead Author for the AR4, I have decided to no longer participate in the IPCC AR4. ~ Sincerely, Chris Landsea
Expert leaves IPCC 17 January, 2005, Resignation letter http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/science_policy_general/000318chris_landsea_leaves.html
*
The climate modelers have been cheating for so long its almost become respectable (Richard Kerr, discussing adjustments in climate models, Science 1997)
*
Personally, I think that these men (along with others like Al Gore), bear a large responsibility for the suffering and nightmares they have inflicted on adults and children around the world.
Here is merely the latest fallout, among the many examples Ive read about, from such reckless behavior:
Climate Change Delusion Driving Boy to Kill Himself http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23992448-5007146,00.html
Hopefully more mature, cooler heads will prevail so that this madness may end.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2047988/posts?page=9#9
Good point. And I already have an idea what I’ll use to replace the crosses. Unfortunately, one editor already sent me some editing requests for the book, so I’m not sure how long until I can find time to “color” some more. ;)
(I truly had my idea before I returned to the thread and saw the one you’d posted. I just don’t move as quickly as you do.)
FredZarguna pointed out that the crosses were out of place, so I replaced them with something more appropriate. If you refresh the page, the new (and improved, I hope) image should appear. The full-size image at the link has been updated, too.
(NOW I need to quit “coloring” and get back to my edits.) ;)
Love it!
Nice touch....hanging around their necks. LOL! May the mercury spill on their skirts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.