Posted on 07/20/2008 9:07:44 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
Conservatism and being pro-infanticide are incompatible.
Mandated by law, from a list of government authorized vendors.
Do not play the victim role. When John McCain will be elected President you Purists will be even more irrelevant than you are now.
© 2007 UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
With all due respect to Jim Robinson... If we solely supported folks that met his strict definition of a good conservative, our ranks in congress would be so marginal, it’d be laugjable... He’s a strict conservative, and that’s fine, but it’s no way to decide how to vote on a state-wide election, let alone a national election... Just MHO
I'm sure that Jim will consider changing his stance on Romney given your reasoned description of his political knowhow.
The same old handful of folks, disrupting every thread... That’s why I set up a separate VP poll thread, to see just how big their numbers are... Guess what, they were loud there too, but each person’s vote counted once, and Mitt came out really well among FReepers
Yet you have no problem with the constant stream of spam and lies from the *omneybots ?
And I do take liberal con-men with a record of destruction trying to destroy my party and pave the way for the absolute takeover of the government by the rodents to be personal. I’m sorry you don’t particularly give a hang, but given your handle, it’s fairly blatant.
When Obama is elected you RINOs will refuse to blame McCain or yourselves for the loss.
Tancredo was paid off.
You are just projecting it seems, calling others such names.
Your false statements reflect poorly upon you, FreeRepublic,
and Romney.
Well given that the *omneybots were pinged to the thread...
I’m sure California Freepers loved it when the MittNittWitts trashed conservative Congressman Duncan Hunter...
LOL!
You amuse me!
Where’s the proof! C’mon give me SOMETHING!
People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Shall we expose the hyposcrisy for you racially enlightened southern Christians, TENNESSEE Nana?
Sure..
As evidenced by Mitt’s getting 55 percent of Very Conservative voters in California.
He doesn’t have to, and that wasn’t the point, but you knew that, didn’t you? It was q respectful disagreement. Thanks for trying to take things out of context
As evidenced by Mitt claiming to get 55 percent of self-described Very Conservative voters in California.
Follow the money.
How may are inactive or dead and still carried on the rolls?
There have been black Mormons since 1832, two years after the “Mormon Church” was founded.
And except for one or two, those black mormons before 1978 were considered "unworthy" for full membership that included receiving the mormon priesthood....Who was it that was trying to accuse ME of spin, seven?
A self-described “Very Conservative” individual in the San Francisco Bay area is somebody who supports the Marxist wing of Communist politics as opposed to the Stalinist wing.
Marxists for Mitt !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.