Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman gives judge earful, lands in jail (Jury Pool Member)
Star-Banner (Ocala, FL) ^ | July 15, 2008 | Suevon Lee

Posted on 07/17/2008 12:56:53 PM PDT by buccaneer81

Woman gives judge earful, lands in jail Obscene outburst nets Sarah Muller contempt charge in jury selection

By Suevon Lee Star-Banner

Published: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 6:30 a.m. Last Modified: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 5:35 a.m. OCALA — A Summerfield woman said she blurted without thinking a couple choice words for a county judge during jury selection at the Marion County Courthouse Monday morning—ones which had landed her in jail by the end of the day.

ALAN YOUNGBLOOD/STAR-BANNER Sarah E. Muller comments on her case during an interview at the Marion County Jail.

click to enlarge Judge R. James McCune, Jr. listens to attorneys in 2006 in Summerfield. Jannet Walsh/Star-Banner/File

“Sometimes I get upset and I say things,” Sarah E. Muller said during an interview with the Star-Banner at the Marion County Jail Booking Center late Monday afternoon. “I didn’t know I would go to jail for freedom of speech.”

Faced with the prospect of serving as a juror and upset that County Judge R. James McCune Jr. denied her request for dismissal, the 23-year-old insulted the presiding judge by calling him a two-syllable curse word—a crude term referring to the anus — within earshot of several of the other 178 potential jurors seated in the Jury Assembly Room.

When the judge asked Muller to clarify her remark, Muller repeated it. He charged her on the spot with direct criminal contempt of the court — a second-degree misdemeanor— and Muller was promptly handcuffed by a court bailiff and taken into custody.

At a hearing later in the afternoon, McCune sentenced Muller to three days in jail and ordered her to pay court costs and fines.

“I was very upset that my excuse that I needed to go to the doctor was not as good an excuse as a lie,” she said later, referring to the judge’s decision to dismiss a woman standing ahead of her in line. If that woman, Muller argued, could escape jury duty by claiming she did not speak English well, how come she couldn’t be removed for health reasons?

She had come to court alone that morning, she said, severely irritated that she had to spend money on gas getting there, rather than the clinic to apply for Social Security disability.

Muller, who is unemployed, said she was born with a leaky valve in her heart and has had four previous heart surgeries to treat it.

“I can’t waste my money on gas to come [to court] and be able to go to the doctor at the same time. Gas ain’t cheap,” she said.

Muller is even more broke than when she arrived at court: She owes the court $50 and the Public Defender’s Office $183 for the brief counsel Assistant Public Defender Hisham Shanawany provided at the hearing.

Muller was the first to hop in line to ask that she be excused by the judge following qualifications Monday morning.

She cited poor health and the need to visit a doctor.

Finding no urgency in her situation, McCune denied her request for dismissal and ordered her to take a seat with the rest of the jury pool.

That did not deter Muller, who re-entered the line and this time, threw in the claim that she was “a racist,” in efforts to cast herself as someone unable to be a fair and impartial juror.

“I just didn’t want to do jury duty. That’s the best excuse there was,” Muller said later.

McCune denied her dismissal once again, at which point Muller insulted him.

During the hearing, McCune called two witnesses to testify about the incident: Deputy Clerk of Court Tonja Leek-Snyder, who was seated beside McCune and witnessed the entire exchange, and bailiff Larry McLemore, who had arrested Muller.

“How in the world did you think that running your mouth in such a foul, profane way would be appropriate in court, of all places?” McCune asked Muller. “Did it even dawn on you that you were already here and you might as well make the most of it?”

Muller apologized to the judge as tears streamed down her face.

“I’m very sorry for calling you that. I did not know it was illegal, and I did not mean to cause disrespect,” she said.

Muller added that cursing was “a very bad habit” of hers and that she was feeling upset, sick, and very broke.

“I’m very poor, and I barely have any money at all,” she protested. “I do not appear to be sick, but I am internally sick.”

On her charge, Muller could have faced up to six months in prison and a $500 court fine.

Muller was sobbing as she was led away to be fingerprinted following the judge’s sentence. When she turned back to face the judge, who remained seated at the bench, his hand cupped in his chin, she asked: “Is there any bond for that?”

“No,” McCune replied.

“I really wasn’t trying to make him look like a fool,” Muller said later. “If anybody looked like a fool, it was me for saying it. But it don’t matter now, because he already put my ass in here,” she said.

As for advice to others trying to avoid jury duty who don’t want to end up in jail, she advised: “Don’t say any cuss words at all. Maybe even ‘damn’ will get you kicked out.”

Suevon Lee can be reached at suevon.lee@starbanner.com or 352-867-4065.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: contempt; judiciary; juryduty; jurypool; leakyvalve; sphincter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-144 next last
To: the_devils_advocate_666

its a beautiful thing, ne?


61 posted on 07/17/2008 1:34:24 PM PDT by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, people, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Any time a judge puts someone in jail without a trial they are in direct violation of the Constitution. But they do not care about the Constitution.
62 posted on 07/17/2008 1:35:02 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5
She was born with the leaky valves and has had 4 heart surgeries. She probably hasn't got long to live.

Muller, who is unemployed, said she was born with a leaky valve in her heart and has had four previous heart surgeries to treat it.

63 posted on 07/17/2008 1:36:00 PM PDT by flutters (God Bless The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Once you're in the courtroom, it's too late. They've got you hooked.

Nah, just tell them the police wouldn't have arrested the defendant if they weren't pretty sure he was guilty.

64 posted on 07/17/2008 1:36:24 PM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

In California, it’s only $5/day, IIRC.


65 posted on 07/17/2008 1:37:34 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Didn’t work for me and I was on the trial for a month! Two weeks of paid JD and managed to squeeze in 40 hours a week of work the other two...


66 posted on 07/17/2008 1:38:08 PM PDT by Axenolith (7-15-08 : Gasoline is an average $0.30/gallon in US 90% silver coinage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chesley
The only time I ever served on a jury (I've been called 3 times), it was a murder trial. We let the killer go. Sounded like self-defense to all 12 of us.

How much of a big smile did the prosecutor have on his face when your verdict was read to the Court? ;)
67 posted on 07/17/2008 1:38:33 PM PDT by mkjessup (Fred Phelps? It's HELL on the phone! It's for YOU! They say "COME ON DOWN!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

or that youre blessed with the ability to spot a guilty man just by looking at him


68 posted on 07/17/2008 1:40:02 PM PDT by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, people, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

You’re absolutely right. The poster should not have made the inference that the woman was on ‘the public dole’. The poster should have characterized it properly and stated that the woman “was too selfish and had no respect for her own civic responsibility to be inconvenienced”. The poster might have also launched into how the woman was very willing to avail herself of the rights afforded her by our system of government but was unwilling to be personally invenienced when any of the responsibilities that goes along with those freedoms fell to her.

The woman admits that her medical appointment was just an excuse, she was just mad that it wasn’t a good enough excuse. After letting her self righteous anger overcome her she then made it painfully clear that no one had taught her that with freedoms come responsibility. She then decided that he middle of a court proceeding was the appropriate time to execrcise her right to free speech. As I taught my son early on, he has plenty of freedoms, he just needs to be sure he takes the responsibility for the outcome that goes along with them when chooses to exercise them. She actually had the nerve to act shocked when someone held her accountable for her actions. Thank goodness she wasn’t selected for the jury, her mistaken sense of entitlement with no responsibilty might have led her to make a poor decision which the rest of society would have to pay for.


69 posted on 07/17/2008 1:41:19 PM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: chesley

I served on a petit jury twice here in my county. At the risk of sounding elitist, I will never break the law because the concept of a “jury of your peers” is bogus. I was absolutely stunned at the sheer stupidity of some of the individuals I served with.


70 posted on 07/17/2008 1:41:39 PM PDT by day10 (Rules cannot substitute for character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
“I was very upset that my excuse that I needed to go to the doctor was not as good an excuse as a lie,” she said later

I guess it would depend on whether the need to see the doctor was urgent. I have a feeling it wasn't.

71 posted on 07/17/2008 1:45:03 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

We do seem to have a higher than normal population of twits that’s for sure. I’m not sure why that is other than the fact that Florida is a popular destination for people looking to escape reality.


72 posted on 07/17/2008 1:45:53 PM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Don’t speak openly about it, just have the two words written down on a business card. Show it to the prosecutor and you are on your way out the door.


73 posted on 07/17/2008 1:47:55 PM PDT by ClayinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Choosing jurors is serious business.

At the trial of my sister’s murderer, a bad one slipped through the selection process. It was an open-and-shut case of first degree premeditated murder, DNA evidence, video of the perp arriving at and leaving the scene of the crime, etc. This juror, who fit the descriptive used by the lady in this story, threatened to hang the jury and got the rest of them to hand down a second-degree conviction. A travesty.

Thank God another adjoining state had already convicted the animal on another first-degree rap and given him life without parole. He’ll rot there until he dies and faces a Judge who doesn’t make mistakes.


74 posted on 07/17/2008 1:49:12 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Independent Party: The citizen-led campaign to save America - www.selfgovernment.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
I get out the old fashioned way. Just don’t show up.

Why get out of it? Are you telling us you would be the kind of person you would not want on the jury if you were on trial? If that is what you're telling us, I'd be interested in why. Do you think you aren't smart enough or what?

By the way, if you really did do this, you are very lucky not to have been arrested.

75 posted on 07/17/2008 1:50:40 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I don’t understand people’s, esp. conservative’s, desire to get out of juries. It’s part of being in a republic. Yes, I think the “pay” is a waste. But why should juries be composed of people too stupid to get out of jury duty?

IMO, voir dire should be banned and the first 12 people who don’t have a clear conflict of interest with either the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, or defendents should be picked. No jacking jurors because a lawyer feels that juror won’t vote the way they want to.


76 posted on 07/17/2008 1:50:56 PM PDT by jjm2111 (Are we going to have a Daily Dose of McCain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Fifty years or so ago, the son of an acquaintance of mine was in court for disturbing the peace with his noisy, muffler-less motorcycle. While the judge was admonishing him for his thoughtlessness, the judge passed gas in a window rattling way to which the young man responded “What? No muffler?” I don't know the outcome but the courtroom broke out in gales of laughter.
77 posted on 07/17/2008 1:52:48 PM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
They were very short of jurors that week, so they didn't release us.

The next day, as I walked up the court house steps to report again, I noticed the prosecutor in front of me talking to another lawyer. The following is an exact quote, as near as I can remember it.

“...they're not supposed to do that. I can tell you one thing. If I wanted to kill someone, I'd crawl a thousand miles on my hands and knees to do it in Etowah County.” (That's in Alabama.)

In other words, he was not at all happy. But he didn't prove to us that it was murder. The only thing we even debated was whether to find him guilty of manslaughter (there wasn't any doubt that he had done it, he admitted it). We didn't think a man should be punished for defending his family. Which is what he had done.

Stabbed the guy in the neck, and he bled out.

78 posted on 07/17/2008 1:53:29 PM PDT by chesley ( Ya can't make chick'n dumplin's outta chick'n feathers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Jury duty is our right and our duty in a nation of laws. Just do it.


79 posted on 07/17/2008 1:54:17 PM PDT by commonguymd (Freedom and individual liberty is for everyone, including the odd and weird people like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Sounds to me like you and your fellow jurors rendered the correct verdict.

Good for you.


80 posted on 07/17/2008 1:58:57 PM PDT by mkjessup (Fred Phelps? It's HELL on the phone! It's for YOU! They say "COME ON DOWN!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson