Posted on 07/17/2008 12:56:53 PM PDT by buccaneer81
its a beautiful thing, ne?
Muller, who is unemployed, said she was born with a leaky valve in her heart and has had four previous heart surgeries to treat it.
Nah, just tell them the police wouldn't have arrested the defendant if they weren't pretty sure he was guilty.
In California, it’s only $5/day, IIRC.
Didn’t work for me and I was on the trial for a month! Two weeks of paid JD and managed to squeeze in 40 hours a week of work the other two...
or that youre blessed with the ability to spot a guilty man just by looking at him
You’re absolutely right. The poster should not have made the inference that the woman was on ‘the public dole’. The poster should have characterized it properly and stated that the woman “was too selfish and had no respect for her own civic responsibility to be inconvenienced”. The poster might have also launched into how the woman was very willing to avail herself of the rights afforded her by our system of government but was unwilling to be personally invenienced when any of the responsibilities that goes along with those freedoms fell to her.
The woman admits that her medical appointment was just an excuse, she was just mad that it wasn’t a good enough excuse. After letting her self righteous anger overcome her she then made it painfully clear that no one had taught her that with freedoms come responsibility. She then decided that he middle of a court proceeding was the appropriate time to execrcise her right to free speech. As I taught my son early on, he has plenty of freedoms, he just needs to be sure he takes the responsibility for the outcome that goes along with them when chooses to exercise them. She actually had the nerve to act shocked when someone held her accountable for her actions. Thank goodness she wasn’t selected for the jury, her mistaken sense of entitlement with no responsibilty might have led her to make a poor decision which the rest of society would have to pay for.
I served on a petit jury twice here in my county. At the risk of sounding elitist, I will never break the law because the concept of a “jury of your peers” is bogus. I was absolutely stunned at the sheer stupidity of some of the individuals I served with.
I guess it would depend on whether the need to see the doctor was urgent. I have a feeling it wasn't.
We do seem to have a higher than normal population of twits that’s for sure. I’m not sure why that is other than the fact that Florida is a popular destination for people looking to escape reality.
Don’t speak openly about it, just have the two words written down on a business card. Show it to the prosecutor and you are on your way out the door.
Choosing jurors is serious business.
At the trial of my sister’s murderer, a bad one slipped through the selection process. It was an open-and-shut case of first degree premeditated murder, DNA evidence, video of the perp arriving at and leaving the scene of the crime, etc. This juror, who fit the descriptive used by the lady in this story, threatened to hang the jury and got the rest of them to hand down a second-degree conviction. A travesty.
Thank God another adjoining state had already convicted the animal on another first-degree rap and given him life without parole. He’ll rot there until he dies and faces a Judge who doesn’t make mistakes.
Why get out of it? Are you telling us you would be the kind of person you would not want on the jury if you were on trial? If that is what you're telling us, I'd be interested in why. Do you think you aren't smart enough or what?
By the way, if you really did do this, you are very lucky not to have been arrested.
I don’t understand people’s, esp. conservative’s, desire to get out of juries. It’s part of being in a republic. Yes, I think the “pay” is a waste. But why should juries be composed of people too stupid to get out of jury duty?
IMO, voir dire should be banned and the first 12 people who don’t have a clear conflict of interest with either the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, or defendents should be picked. No jacking jurors because a lawyer feels that juror won’t vote the way they want to.
The next day, as I walked up the court house steps to report again, I noticed the prosecutor in front of me talking to another lawyer. The following is an exact quote, as near as I can remember it.
“...they're not supposed to do that. I can tell you one thing. If I wanted to kill someone, I'd crawl a thousand miles on my hands and knees to do it in Etowah County.” (That's in Alabama.)
In other words, he was not at all happy. But he didn't prove to us that it was murder. The only thing we even debated was whether to find him guilty of manslaughter (there wasn't any doubt that he had done it, he admitted it). We didn't think a man should be punished for defending his family. Which is what he had done.
Stabbed the guy in the neck, and he bled out.
Jury duty is our right and our duty in a nation of laws. Just do it.
Sounds to me like you and your fellow jurors rendered the correct verdict.
Good for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.