Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wall-E doesn't say anything
LA Times ^ | 13 July 2008 | Charlotte Allen

Posted on 07/13/2008 6:24:04 AM PDT by shrinkermd

...I can understand where the conservatives are coming from, because liberal critics and pundits are treating "Wall-E" as a piece of G-rated schoolroom propaganda designed to drill into childish heads the duty to climb aboard the climate-alarmist, capitalist-bashing bandwagon. The most blatant example of this came from Frank Rich of the New York Times, who wrote, "At the end, [the kids in the audience] clapped their small hands. What they applauded was ... a gentle, if unmistakable, summons to remake the world before time runs out." Gaagh -- give me Dirty Harry any day. The irony of all this is that if "Wall-E" is didactic, what it has to teach is profoundly conservative. For starters, the film never even goes near the climate-crusading vocabulary of "global warming," "carbon footprints" or even "green," which used to mean "verdant and lovely" but now means "twisty fluorescent lightbulbs." The crime of the humans who vacate Earth isn't failure to drive a Prius but strewing detritus. Conservatives detest litterbugs and other parasites who expect others to clean up after them. "Wall-E" champions hard work, faithfulness to duty and the fact that even a dreary job like garbage-collecting can be meaningful and fulfilling.

...In its portrayal of the overweight slobs on the spaceship, "Wall-E" isn't denigrating consumerism but passive dependency. Junk-food-fueled obesity correlates inversely with socioeconomic status, and it's those on the low end who the liberal welfare state tries to scoop up as permanent clients. "Wall-E" is also pro-life. When Eve shuts down after retrieving a green plant from Earth (she's literally in a "persistent vegetative state"), Wall-E doesn't decide she has a "right to die" so he can get rid of her; he carts her around tenderly and decks her with some still-functioning Christmas lights he has retrieved from human disposables.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservative; liberal; walle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
I have not seen the movie. But it does seem to inculcate a point of view not substantiated by empirical findings.
1 posted on 07/13/2008 6:24:04 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I have not seen the movie. But it does seem to inculcate a point of view not substantiated by empirical findings.

I have seen the movie and too many folks are using it as an excuse to bloviate. As far as its point of view goes, about the most it says is that the human species dirtied up the place where it lived and moved on to temporary environs while leaving behind machinery to clean it up before returning. This is more than can be said for most other species that will eat and reproduce until they run out of clean space and food and then move on. This movie is not heavy-handed environmentalist agit-prop.
2 posted on 07/13/2008 6:32:50 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; shrinkermd
This movie is not heavy-handed environmentalist agit-prop.

Ok...but is it "prop" of some sort? Is it, "didactic?"

Harry Callahan for adults is one thing. That may have a message too, for people who (should have) a handle on their morality and ethics.

But subtle messages , good or bad, with toonish characters for young 'skulls full of mush' concerns me in any format. Just too Brave New Worldish feelies for me.

3 posted on 07/13/2008 6:47:33 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

I saw the movie with my wife and we enjoyed it as mindless entertainment. Two impressions:
The earth is robust and will repair itself.
At the end of the movie, like the Jews in the wilderness, I gave those people about a week before they were screaming to go back into space.


4 posted on 07/13/2008 6:58:21 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: super7man

You thought it was mindless? A lot of thought went into it.


5 posted on 07/13/2008 6:59:44 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Tolkein once complained that too many people were reading too much into his Lord of the Rings books. He proclaimed “There’s a difference between allegory and applicability.” I have seen “Wall-e” and many different people can see in it many different things. As is the case with anything, it is what you take away from it. But this is for sure: to refuse to see this movie based on it’s hear-say, alleged politics will deny you the pleasure of this near masterpiece of a film. Go see it and take away from it what you will. You won’t regret it.

FYI, the director of the movie said in an interview that the humans are fat and helpless because he pictured them as being babies who had had all of their cares attended to for their entire lives. They are meant to look like helpless babies. Nothing more. GO SEE THIS FILM! YOU’LL LOVE IT!


6 posted on 07/13/2008 7:03:27 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
This is more than can be said for most other species that will eat and reproduce until they run out of clean space and food and then move on. This movie is not heavy-handed environmentalist agit-prop.

Ironically you actually just described how many of the Native Americans the environmental movement is so fond of actually lived.

7 posted on 07/13/2008 7:06:05 AM PDT by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: super7man; Borges
I gave those people about a week before they were screaming to go back into space.

The drawings on screen during the credits show that the Earth comes back to life, as do the people, who become active again and lose weight, they re-establish their relationship with Earth.

I thought it was a very good movie with a lot of talent, and thought, behind it.

8 posted on 07/13/2008 7:07:38 AM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
refuse to see this movie based on it’s hear-say, alleged politics will deny you the pleasure of this near masterpiece of a film. Go see it and take away from it what you will. You won’t regret it.

What you said, LOL!

9 posted on 07/13/2008 7:08:52 AM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
My 10YO son saw it at camp. He was only so-so on it. Kind of boring he said.
10 posted on 07/13/2008 7:14:55 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlapHappyPappy
. .many of the Native Americans the environmental movement is so fond of actually lived.

Ouch, bullsye, you win!

There's a poster I saw "How the west was really won", it was a bunch of "natives" sittin' around drinkin'.

11 posted on 07/13/2008 7:15:44 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

This was an EXCELLENT movie. Conservatives can view this film and conjure any number of liberal themes that may or may not be present, and I suspect Liberals could conjure up several real or imagined conservative themes.

This is, by far, Pixar’s best movie to date. It was a tehnical masterpiece and a heart-warming story. It will be a family classic for generations.

As someone else said, if you don’t see this movie based on someone else’s “much ado about nothing”, the only one you’ll be hurting is yourself.


12 posted on 07/13/2008 7:16:12 AM PDT by Egon ("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
If, and when, it comes on TV I will watch it. I do note the basic premise of the plot is people left to their own devices mankind become fat, dependent and destroy the environment with trash; hence, they need direction. This is an unsubstantiated belief common to environmentalism.

Human nature has changed, little, if at all, over time. Industrialization has been a boon to the average person. Technology, including medical, has given us a healthy rather than an unhealthy lifestyle. We pick up our trash in Douglas County, Minnesota. The environment up here is cleaner and better cared for than it was 40 years ago. Unlike you and the author of Wall-e, I hesitate to predict the future 800 years hence. That is the prudent approach which is a bedrock, conservative value.

13 posted on 07/13/2008 7:19:35 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SlapHappyPappy
Ironically you actually just described how many of the Native Americans the environmental movement is so fond of actually lived.

Yeah, heh, heh, heh.
14 posted on 07/13/2008 7:24:36 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Egon
I agree I like the movie. There's more propaganda in 90 minute of CNN News broadcasts. I didn't see it as explicit or overpowering.

Living in New Jersey, the "East Germany" of the United States, I'm very sensitive to the exposure my child gets to the ideas of the political left, but I didn't have a problem with this movie.

Mostly I found it to be harmless entertainment.

15 posted on 07/13/2008 7:30:12 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE - http://freenj.blogspot.com - RadioFree NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Reminds me of when the first Matrix came out, and people could interpret it either way.


16 posted on 07/13/2008 7:48:27 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Warning Spoilers!

My children and I saw it yesterday.

On the way home my eldest (13) said is that what you keep talking about? Those people who went on vacation while others clean up?

I pointed out to her, how the “ads” included elderly in hover-chairs going along so no one had to miss out on the “vacation” (don't leave us boomers out of the fun, or you can't go), we also discussed how after a while, none knew how to walk (everyone was in a hover chair) paid attention to where they were, or even if they were virtually talking to the person right next to them. she responded “I didn't know we had pool.” (a line from the movie)... we had lot more, but I hope you get the idea.

This was such a referendum on “boomers” it's a must buy as soon as it's available.

JM.02

17 posted on 07/13/2008 8:01:52 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

None = no one, sheesh!


18 posted on 07/13/2008 8:09:24 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
The movie is about:

- Relationships
- Fulfilling the purpose for which you were created.

The movie was well thought out and manifests those two themes very well. The "environmental" aspect of the movie is over-blown. It is merely the method to tell the story, and in the end the fact that the earth "needs" humans to fulfill its purpose is completely anti-environmental.

Everything in the movie fulfills the purpose for which it is created - with a great sense of duty. At first it is only the machines. They are so motivated by duty that it is only at the last moment that relationships hinder duty.

Eventually, the humans recognize their duty, and return to earth. In the process of that awakening, they realize that they have lost contact with each other by means of technolgy.

The final scenes make it clear that the environment needs human beings, fulfilling their duty of carrying for and working the ground.

Ultimately, the story-line is quite biblical.
19 posted on 07/13/2008 8:10:21 AM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Unlike you and the author of Wall-e, I hesitate to predict the future 800 years hence. That is the prudent approach which is a bedrock, conservative value.

Are you suggesting that any and all futurism (most science fiction) is left wing on general principle?
20 posted on 07/13/2008 8:18:49 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson