Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy Crisis Has Its Roots In Reaganism [megabarf alert, finish your dinner before reading]
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 2008-07-08 | Richard Cohen

Posted on 07/07/2008 5:53:58 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Perusing the Sunday newspapers with plagiaristic intent, I come across an article about who's responsible for the current energy debacle.

Politicians are mentioned along with the amazingly shortsighted auto executives and the oil industry itself. Names — lots of names — are dropped, everyone from the current Bush to the previous Bush to Clinton.

But not a mention of the culprit-in-chief, Ronald Wilson Reagan — still, after all these years, the Teflon president.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: carter2; carterjr; carterredux; democrats; energy; environment; oil; reagan; stupidsocialists
It is not my intention to pummel the late Mr. Reagan for what he did or did not do back in the 1980s. It is my intention, though, to suggest that Reaganism — to which all Republicans now swear allegiance — has outlived its very short usefulness and ought to be junked.
1 posted on 07/07/2008 5:53:59 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

It is the monstrous stupidity of liberals like Mr. Cohen and their friendly RINOs that has put much of the potential energy output of this nation off-limits. Private enterprise can’t do its great work when moronic liberals make illegal or too damned difficult much of the potential oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear production that we could be enjoying. The markets cannot respond properly to incentives when the libs and RINOs have tied up so many resources and blocked such important options.


2 posted on 07/07/2008 6:01:36 PM PDT by Enchante (OBAMA: "That's not the Wesley Clark I knew!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I’m getting tired of these Luddites getting all excited about the current price of oil, and getting all shivers over the examination of my carbon footprints.

They want globalization, they want big taxes to be spent on controlling freedom and liberty. It’s not about global warming or climate change.

It’s about warming up to big Global taxation, one world government, and changing the climate to accept a unified taxable system a.k.a. big brother.


3 posted on 07/07/2008 6:08:58 PM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Richard Cohen in IBD!?
I thought that ancient scatterbrained leftist had died.


4 posted on 07/07/2008 6:10:01 PM PDT by Nevermore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If you like $5/gal, Thank Congress. If you want $10, Vote Obama.

Pray for W and Our Troops


5 posted on 07/07/2008 6:14:13 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Just another surly socialist.

Forgets and if not,resents,the men who protect his rights to be a butthead.


6 posted on 07/07/2008 6:14:56 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Misera contribuens plebs!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

We should send Mr. Cohen to Planet Gore.


7 posted on 07/07/2008 6:16:06 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("Facts are stubborn things." –Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shineon

Forget about taxing energy. Just come right out with it and tax all money. Every time money is used tax it. It would be more honest. If it’s spent, tax it. If it’s saved tax it. If it’s lost or gained, tax it.

Oh, that’s the way the system already works. Never mind.


8 posted on 07/07/2008 6:19:51 PM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Most of his [Carter’s] dire predictions — “It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century” — have generally come true, although not quite as soon or calamitously as he warned. The pity of it all is that in American politics, being right is beside the point.

Well, of course he was correct... The Democrats made certain of that by blocking drilling.

I don’t see in this piece why the writer thinks Reagan is to blame for the energy crisis. The only clue he gives is his view that Reagan did not push thru an energy policy. But that’s kinda hard to blame on Reagan since Carter, Bush, Clinton, and Bush did not do so either, by his own admission. And the reality is that Reagan did propose an energy program. He pushed for more drilling on public lands, just as both Bushes did. It was only Carter and Clinton who had no energy policy.


9 posted on 07/07/2008 6:24:02 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Cohen is a moron. Conservation as the hallmark of energy policy is doomed to failure and is the sign of a weak mind as they don’t WANT to make the really *tough* energy policy decisions.

Why? Because we all know what it means to conserve. Some conserve more than others because of smaller incomes. Some conserve more than others because of *larger* incomes. They know what it means to pennypinch and they are glad to do it.

Some conserve more than others because they like to feel good. Using a gallon of gas less a month make them feel good because they are saving the earth. Sort of like the feeling one gets when getting your car’s oil changed.

The bottom line is we ALL know what it means to conserve and CHOOSE whether to do it or not. Having the president of the United States tell us to put on a sweater and turn down the thermostat is the height of moronimity and shows what the Democrat Party really thinks of your intelligence.


10 posted on 07/07/2008 6:29:14 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Barack Hussein Obama=Jimmy Carter Part Deux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
How can the "energy crisis" have its roots in Reaganism when it began in Nixon's term? Oh yes, I remember the odd-even gas rationing and the no gas on Sundays rules, and year round "daylight savings time" forcing my elementary school to start and end a half hour later. Reagan was just a second term governor on the west coast in those days. I also remember these big billboards. They had a photo of the earth, with a gas gauge with under a quarter-tank on it, and the large caption, "What then?" A couple of years later, the same image, this time with the gauge smack on the "E" and the caption "What now?" Out high school debate topic was solar the energy. The affirmative, that it was viable and should be promoted, won. After all, practical solar energy was just around the corner in 1979. Reagan wasn't even elected yet. Now, whatever Reagan did or didn't do, he didn't invade Sweden, Red China, India, South Africa, Japan or Germany. All of these countries, or companies within these countries, have sufficient incentive to come up with a magic bullet if there was one. They don't need our permission. Indeed, places like Iceland have used their natural resources to their advantage, and France and Japan have not been shy about using nukes to power their energy-resource shy nations. Considering the article was in Investors Business Daily, it is long on invective and short on facts. Reagan wasn't just about laissez-faire. He was about undoing the damage done by Jimmy Carter, whose dire prophecies came through because he was so good at creating conditions friendly to bad things. The Windfall profits tax moved oil OUT of this country and made it scarcer. Our current problems with oil are occurring almost two decades after Reagan left office, and even though the price of fuel has never been higher, it is much, MUCH better to have it a bit more expensive and to actyually have it available. The Carter scheme of cutting back just created a panic mode, and OPEC was always able to further push output down, when they wanted to (though there was spot cheating).

The author of this piece acts like he didn't even live through Jimmy Carter. I did.
11 posted on 07/07/2008 6:31:00 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Yes, let’s abolish Reaganism and return to what preceded it, namely high gas prices and rationing.


12 posted on 07/07/2008 6:40:05 PM PDT by eclecticEel (men who believe deeply in something, even wrong, usually triumph over men who believe in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If we all wore sweaters and drove 55 like Carter suggested, we would all be saved now.


13 posted on 07/07/2008 7:01:31 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; ...
"We should send Mr. Cohen to Planet Gore. "

He may not be up to it.

 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

14 posted on 07/07/2008 7:42:13 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

btt


15 posted on 07/07/2008 7:54:21 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson