Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Employers Fight Tough Measures on Immigration
New York Times ^ | 6 July 2008 | By JULIA PRESTON

Posted on 07/05/2008 6:02:02 PM PDT by shrinkermd

Under pressure from the toughest crackdown on illegal immigration in two decades, employers across the country are fighting back in state legislatures, the federal courts and city halls.

Business groups have resisted measures that would revoke the licenses of employers of illegal immigrants. They are proposing alternatives that would revise federal rules for verifying the identity documents of new hires and would expand programs to bring legal immigrant laborers.

Though the pushback is coming from both Democrats and Republicans, in many places it is reopening the rift over immigration that troubled the Republican Party last year. Businesses, generally Republican stalwarts, are standing up to others within the party who accuse them of undercutting border enforcement and jeopardizing American jobs by hiring illegal immigrants as cheap labor.

Employers in Arizona were stung by a law passed last year by the Republican-controlled Legislature that revokes the licenses of businesses caught twice with illegal immigrants. They won approval in this year’s session of a narrowing of that law making clear that it did not apply to workers hired before this year.

Last week, an Arizona employers’ group submitted more than 284,000 signatures — far more than needed — for a November ballot initiative that would make the 2007 law even friendlier to employers.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; employment; illegals; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Long article, focuses on Arizona and California.
1 posted on 07/05/2008 6:02:02 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

If they’re hiring illegals they should be tough guys behind bars.


2 posted on 07/05/2008 6:07:50 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Obama (Marxist), Manchuria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

This is leaning towards a national database. If the employers are presented with authentic (possibly stolen) papers, then they should not be held accountable. But then you’ll have employers falsifying documents, this happens alot in the construction industry.

I’m torn on this one. However KNOWINGLY hiring illegals, or a high percentage of illegals should be a no brainer, jail.


3 posted on 07/05/2008 6:10:24 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Short-term profit is more important than country. That seems to be what is getting us in trouble in many areas....short term profit is the holy grail.

Sooner or later though a bunch of short-terms end up to be a "long-term" and you find that the basis of your prosperity....America....is no longer a good foundation for profit.
4 posted on 07/05/2008 6:21:21 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
"Business groups have resisted measures that would revoke the licenses of employers of illegal immigrants. They are proposing alternatives that would revise federal rules for verifying the identity documents of new hires..."

These business groups should be arrested.

5 posted on 07/05/2008 6:28:21 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
However KNOWINGLY hiring illegals, or a high percentage of illegals should be a no brainer, jail.

Absolutely. Including propoents of amnesty for illegals. Following my logic, that puts McCain and President Bush in jail too.

6 posted on 07/05/2008 6:30:46 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd; All
"They are proposing alternatives that would revise federal rules for verifying the identity documents of new hires and would expand programs to bring legal immigrant laborers."

Illegal subsidize

Guest Worker

7 posted on 07/05/2008 6:35:02 PM PDT by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
It should run like this....employers (*all* employers) ask each and *every* individual they hire for one or more confirmatory documents proving one's right to live and work here (birth cert,green card.etc,etc).Failure to present such a document results in the person being forbidden from being hired.All documents submitted are sent to DC (the State Dept?...the INS?) to verify validity.If validity cannot be established within 30 business word is sent to the employer ordering that the employee be either suspended (without pay,benefits,unemployment compensation,etc) or fired.If a particular person's document can be verified after suspension or dismissal then the employee can be reinstated/rehired.If the document submitted is shown to be phony the case is turned over to the DOJ for prosecution.

No exceptions.

None!

8 posted on 07/05/2008 6:36:28 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The problem with the rat race is,even if you win you're still a rat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I want to be clear up front I didn’t read more than the first page of the article although I usually do before posting.

I own a small business in Tucson, Arizona and agree that there is a problem hiring illegals here. And that we need to stop that practice.

What I don’t like is making business owners responsible for border enforcement. If they can’t get here I can’t hire them. As far as I know I’ve never hired an illegal and I never will on purpose. As another insane obstacle here in Arizona (according to my employment agency) I can’t even inquire as to immigration status until AFTER I hire them. Then if they’re a member of some protected minority my company may get sued.

But there are people (insert well-known but unsayable group name here) that are crossing our borders that don’t want jobs; they want jihad and checking a federal database won’t keep them out.


9 posted on 07/05/2008 6:52:01 PM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Do I waste my time explaining? He had such trouble with my name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

more like competing and going belly up!


10 posted on 07/05/2008 7:07:45 PM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
This is leaning towards a national database.

I remember when I got out of college in 1985, and while looking for more lucrative employment, I was a restaurant manager. When The I-9 form came along in 1986, we were told that no illegal would be able to hide and no employer would be able to get away without penalty.

Yeah, right.

11 posted on 07/05/2008 7:19:35 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Short-term profit is more important than country. That seems to be what is getting us in trouble in many areas....short term profit is the holy grail.

Indeed.


12 posted on 07/05/2008 7:51:32 PM PDT by rdb3 (Upward, onward, beyond...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Lie about your employee’s immigration status.
Cheat, undercut your competitor’s costs with illegal immigration.
Steal the identity of an American.


13 posted on 07/05/2008 8:11:34 PM PDT by Haddit (A Hunter Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Good. Have them all sign up to complain. Then investigate and start jailing the CEOs.


14 posted on 07/05/2008 8:14:22 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

I’m from Wisconsin
Law here is 10 days to file new hire with the state including name, date of birth and social security
Also, you have to show picture id and s.s. card prior to being hired
Sounds simple enough to me

Those employers complaining just want to keep their costs down while the rest of us foot the bill.


15 posted on 07/05/2008 8:19:59 PM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG
Then if they’re a member of some protected minority my company may get sued.

"Hispanics" have no historical basis for protected status. They are not a race, they are a geographical group, an an ill-defined one at that. Brazilians, for example, are not Hispanic because they speak Portuguese. Spaniards, on the other hand, are even though they are on the opposite side of the Atlantic.

Any amnesty or guest worker program should bring with it a price that anyone admitted under such programs must agree to forgo "groupism" or legally defined "minority" status as a price of admission into a country which has never legally discriminated against them in anything remotely close to the legal discriminations against blacks and American Indians.

16 posted on 07/05/2008 8:35:28 PM PDT by Vigilanteman ((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Haddit

Supply and Demand.

If there really is a “shortage” of labor, employers will keep increasing wages, increasing benefits, and improving working conditions until the shortage abates.

Employers have not done that.

In 2007 America accepted 700,000 new citizens, 1.05 million legal residents (largely relatives of new citizens), and 500,000 temporary workers.

No serious person, no honest person, can look at numbers like that and claim there is a “labor shortage.”

This massive - and completely legal - influx of foreign labor has reduced the standard of living of tens of millions of home grown Americans.


17 posted on 07/05/2008 8:58:20 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

We have that requirement for reporting new hires in AZ too. They use that info to track child support evaders and other miscreants.

You’re going to foot the bill no matter what anyway. Any cost imposed on businesses in general gets passed on to the consumer. I WANT illegal aliens stopped at the border. I have to compete with companies that hire illegals through shady employment practices.

Any business that fails to control costs is destined to go out of business.

The federal government has abdicated their responsibility to protect us from this invasion. I don’t think it’s fair to make my business (14 employees including me) an enforcer of immigration law. I’ll do what I can to screen when I interview but it should be stopped AT THE BORDER!!!!


18 posted on 07/05/2008 9:01:26 PM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Do I waste my time explaining? He had such trouble with my name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

In 1992 I had the choice of violating every wage,labor.an tax law and staying in business but chose to close a 57 year old firm.

I want to see every employer if illegals in prison and fined the maximum.

It’s personal!!!


19 posted on 07/05/2008 9:14:37 PM PDT by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

These guys love the cheap labor, as long as the taxpayer foots the bill for everything else. Now they are in danger of getting caught and are squealing like stuck pigs. I have zero sympathy for these people.


20 posted on 07/05/2008 9:14:37 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson