Skip to comments.
Burning Salt Water on YouTube, Inventor Waits for Prime Time [Update]
www.popularmechanics.com ^
| 01 July 2008
| By Daniel Tam-Claiborne
Posted on 07/02/2008 10:11:37 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
He's also working on a cancer cure using his RF enegy machine. I pray to God that he finds one or both of his devices a success!.............
To: Red Badger
Kanzius and Roy hope that the increasing focus on the environment will enable them to get funding to continue their research. See, right there is where it all goes wrong. The way it's supposed to work is that increasing focus on PROFITS will enable them to get funding to continue their research.
People love to make profits. If no one is funding this, then it's probably going to become a federally subsidized wealth redistribution scheme.
2
posted on
07/02/2008 10:16:33 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Red Badger; tx_eggman
First we burn up all our corn, then we burn up all our water...
how the hell will we make whiskey?!?!?
3
posted on
07/02/2008 10:17:16 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
To: Red Badger
Am I missing something here? If you have the electrical power in the car to produce the radio waves, why not just skip the water part and connect it to an electric motor to drive the wheels?
To: Red Badger
"Nobody is claiming that you get more energy out than you put in," he says. Acknowledging the First Law of Thermodynamics is a good place to start with this kind of thing.
Now between figuring out how much energy in vs. out, and showing this is a suitable form of hydrolysis, then maybe we'll finally nab two problems: simple hydrogen production (for fuel cell use), and desalination (for drinking water).
5
posted on
07/02/2008 10:18:35 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
To: Red Badger
Wow Saline Air!
That would really help you non oceanside allergy prone people, ya think.
6
posted on
07/02/2008 10:18:47 AM PDT
by
Global2010
(OKIE DOKIE)
To: Red Badger
you can also pop corn with cellphones :p
7
posted on
07/02/2008 10:19:42 AM PDT
by
steveo
(Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
To: antiRepublicrat
Oh, that’s just soooooo old fashioned!...............
8
posted on
07/02/2008 10:20:16 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
To: SpinnerWebb
Finally, a sane and refreshing thought in the energy debate.
9
posted on
07/02/2008 10:20:38 AM PDT
by
Sender
(Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
To: antiRepublicrat
"If you have the electrical power in the car"You're assumption is bad.
10
posted on
07/02/2008 10:25:17 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: Sender; tx_eggman
Finally, a sane and refreshing thought in the energy debate.
I'll drink to that!
11
posted on
07/02/2008 10:25:58 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
To: antiRepublicrat
Yep.Watts are watts. It’s going to use the same amount of power to crack the water, which will be less than you can get from the hydrogen produced.
12
posted on
07/02/2008 10:25:58 AM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: Red Badger
Al Gore claims to have found a way to control the weather.
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Obama claims to have found a way to control Algore.............
14
posted on
07/02/2008 10:32:39 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
To: antiRepublicrat
There may be instances when it is preferable to carry around hydrogen as an energy source as opposed to carrying around batteries or batteries + water.
15
posted on
07/02/2008 10:37:42 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
(Ask me again tomorrow.)
To: Red Badger; All
Please Red stop with this nonsense!
16
posted on
07/02/2008 10:39:43 AM PDT
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: ltc8k6
Which kind of engine do you want in your vehicle if your are living in International Falls in the middle of winter? One that runs on batteries or one that runs on a tankful of hydrogen?
17
posted on
07/02/2008 10:40:48 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
(Ask me again tomorrow.)
To: Red Badger
Another high-tech snake oil salesman whose success depends on the communist-wrecked public education system turning out gullible dupes.
18
posted on
07/02/2008 10:41:18 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
To: truthguy
You’ve got to shuck a lot of oysters to find a pearl.............
19
posted on
07/02/2008 10:48:38 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
To: antiRepublicrat
The energy released in a hydrogen/oxygen reaction is greater?
Actually internal combustion is more efficient than chemical/battery power, that’s the only reason.
But it seems to me that using the energy from batteries to power the radio system would be rather... expensive. Having used many HF radios, I say that most radios aren’t that efficient. You input a large amount of power into the finals and toward the antenna but the coupling isn’t 100% efficient, so you lose energy. Oh well. (No such thing as perpetual motion!)
20
posted on
07/02/2008 10:52:29 AM PDT
by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson