Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burning Salt Water on YouTube, Inventor Waits for Prime Time [Update]
www.popularmechanics.com ^ | 01 July 2008 | By Daniel Tam-Claiborne

Posted on 07/02/2008 10:11:37 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
He's also working on a cancer cure using his RF enegy machine. I pray to God that he finds one or both of his devices a success!.............
1 posted on 07/02/2008 10:11:38 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Kanzius and Roy hope that the increasing focus on the environment will enable them to get funding to continue their research.

See, right there is where it all goes wrong. The way it's supposed to work is that increasing focus on PROFITS will enable them to get funding to continue their research.

People love to make profits. If no one is funding this, then it's probably going to become a federally subsidized wealth redistribution scheme.

2 posted on 07/02/2008 10:16:33 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; tx_eggman

First we burn up all our corn, then we burn up all our water...

how the hell will we make whiskey?!?!?


3 posted on 07/02/2008 10:17:16 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Am I missing something here? If you have the electrical power in the car to produce the radio waves, why not just skip the water part and connect it to an electric motor to drive the wheels?


4 posted on 07/02/2008 10:17:57 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Nobody is claiming that you get more energy out than you put in," he says.

Acknowledging the First Law of Thermodynamics is a good place to start with this kind of thing.

Now between figuring out how much energy in vs. out, and showing this is a suitable form of hydrolysis, then maybe we'll finally nab two problems: simple hydrogen production (for fuel cell use), and desalination (for drinking water).

5 posted on 07/02/2008 10:18:35 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wow Saline Air!
That would really help you non oceanside allergy prone people, ya think.


6 posted on 07/02/2008 10:18:47 AM PDT by Global2010 (OKIE DOKIE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

you can also pop corn with cellphones :p


7 posted on 07/02/2008 10:19:42 AM PDT by steveo (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Oh, that’s just soooooo old fashioned!...............


8 posted on 07/02/2008 10:20:16 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

Finally, a sane and refreshing thought in the energy debate.


9 posted on 07/02/2008 10:20:38 AM PDT by Sender (Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
"If you have the electrical power in the car"

You're assumption is bad.

10 posted on 07/02/2008 10:25:17 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sender; tx_eggman
Finally, a sane and refreshing thought in the energy debate.

I'll drink to that!
11 posted on 07/02/2008 10:25:58 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Yep.Watts are watts. It’s going to use the same amount of power to crack the water, which will be less than you can get from the hydrogen produced.


12 posted on 07/02/2008 10:25:58 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Al Gore claims to have found a way to control the weather.


13 posted on 07/02/2008 10:27:42 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Obama claims to have found a way to control Algore.............


14 posted on 07/02/2008 10:32:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

There may be instances when it is preferable to carry around hydrogen as an energy source as opposed to carrying around batteries or batteries + water.


15 posted on 07/02/2008 10:37:42 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; All

Please Red stop with this nonsense!


16 posted on 07/02/2008 10:39:43 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Which kind of engine do you want in your vehicle if your are living in International Falls in the middle of winter? One that runs on batteries or one that runs on a tankful of hydrogen?


17 posted on 07/02/2008 10:40:48 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Another high-tech snake oil salesman whose success depends on the communist-wrecked public education system turning out gullible dupes.


18 posted on 07/02/2008 10:41:18 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

You’ve got to shuck a lot of oysters to find a pearl.............


19 posted on 07/02/2008 10:48:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

The energy released in a hydrogen/oxygen reaction is greater?

Actually internal combustion is more efficient than chemical/battery power, that’s the only reason.

But it seems to me that using the energy from batteries to power the radio system would be rather... expensive. Having used many HF radios, I say that most radios aren’t that efficient. You input a large amount of power into the finals and toward the antenna but the coupling isn’t 100% efficient, so you lose energy. Oh well. (No such thing as perpetual motion!)


20 posted on 07/02/2008 10:52:29 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson