Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE HIGH COURT'S SUPREME CLOWN["Kennedy is the court's...worst justice."]
NYPOST ^ | 07/01/08 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 07/01/2008 4:27:22 AM PDT by coffee260

WHY did the Founders bother toiling in the summer heat of Philadelphia in 1787 writing a Constitution when they could have relied on the consciences of Supreme Court justices like Anthony Kennedy instead?

Kennedy is the court's most important swing vote and its worst justice. Whatever else you think of them, a Justice Antonin Scalia or Ruth Bader Ginsburg has a consistent judicial philosophy - while Kennedy expects the nation to bend to his moral whimsy. With apologies to Louis XIV, Kennedy might as well declare la constitution, c'est moi!

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: godsinblack; impeachkennedy; judicialactivism; judiciary; justicekennedy; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2008 4:27:22 AM PDT by coffee260
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Stevens is the worst. Kennedy is the most schizophrenically embarrassing.


2 posted on 07/01/2008 4:32:43 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

What the hell does the man stand for? He’s all over the map. At least you always know how a Ginsburg will vote.


3 posted on 07/01/2008 4:35:21 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

A clown? Yes...a clown. In a role that requires no clowns. As to being the worst...I’d put RBG ahead of him for that distinction, IMO.


4 posted on 07/01/2008 4:44:47 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Well..he is almost 90..that could explain a lot!


5 posted on 07/01/2008 4:47:17 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

Kennedy is almost 90?!?


6 posted on 07/01/2008 4:48:34 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

I just looked him up—born 1936. 72 as in 72 virgins.


7 posted on 07/01/2008 4:50:00 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
He's not the worst, but he is the second most disappointing justice now on the bench. The first, of course, is Souter. The sad part is that Kennedy has dramatically increased his leftward drift the last 4-5 years or so. To think we should have six solid conservatives, but only have four is disgusting.
8 posted on 07/01/2008 4:51:21 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

I think he must choose like I did when I took business law. In the cases I studied I wanted to see a party win because it was the “right thing” but unfortunately that party was on the wrong side of the law.


9 posted on 07/01/2008 4:51:30 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

When Hamilton backed up the Continental currency, our word meant something. Now, we have no uniform standard of law, it is at the whimsey of a court that has no conviction to the Constitution.


10 posted on 07/01/2008 5:19:45 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Bolshecrat, where patriotism is replacing the stars in the flag with hammers and sickles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Stevens is the worst. Kennedy is the most schizophrenically embarrassing.

Where would you rank Ginsburg and Souter? Or can't they be the worst because they are more incompetent than wrong-minded (Ginsburg is both)?

11 posted on 07/01/2008 5:28:00 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I have had this discussion before, only about which state has the worst U.S. Senators. My two, Durbin and Osama will give any other two a run for the money and they are contending with the likes of Schumer/Clinton, Kennedy/Kerry.


12 posted on 07/01/2008 5:57:56 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

The Court jester is not funny.


13 posted on 07/01/2008 6:06:37 AM PDT by RoadTest ( Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. But he spake of the temple of his body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Senators? I’ll stack my two against yours (Kennedy/Kerry). Kennedy’s done a lot of long term damage, over several decades. I’ll grant you, though, that Obama’s got potential and a base to build on!


14 posted on 07/01/2008 6:34:42 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

If by worst - you mean mean & evil, maybe Illinois wins (er ....looses), but if by worst you mean STUPID - then I think Washington State, with Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell win HANDS DOWN!!!


15 posted on 07/01/2008 6:55:23 AM PDT by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
I have a real problem with people who attack Kennedy while giving a pass to Stevens and Souter - to say nothing of Ginsburg and Breyer, who at least were named by Clinton and therefore have an excuse of sorts.

At least Kennedy is right as often as the Court as a whole is right. The others I mention would have to vastly improve to be as accurate as a stopped clock.

Likewise, I have a real problem when people want to attack the oil companies for the high price of gas - yet the gas stations are, obviously, the place where the price of gas is the lowest - you try to buy gas anywhere else, they'll just go to the gas station for the gas, and charge you for the trouble.


16 posted on 07/01/2008 7:07:22 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Stevens respects the 4th Amendment.


17 posted on 07/01/2008 7:07:36 AM PDT by Natchez Hawk (DB Cooper posted here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

At least Stevens and the crew are consistent. The only thing you will find in the middle of the road is Justice Kennedy and road kill, and both are equally worthy of our respect.


18 posted on 07/01/2008 7:54:18 AM PDT by Texas Federalist (Jindal for VP '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
With apologies to Louis XIV, Kennedy might as well declare la constitution, c'est moi! (The Constitution, It Is Me1)
Don't blame me for Kennedy. I voted for my RINO so we'd keep the US House of Reps. And if we still had the majority in the House and ...Tom Delay, we could do something about this horse's ass and other Fed Judges who make up the law as they go along.

oops, my bad I forgot. Tom Delay did once mention looking into doing something about these 'gods in Black', i.e.: Impeachment, and got b*tch-sl*pped by almost everyone for 'threatening them and their independence'. Creating an 'atmosphere of fear' or some similar nonsense and putting all the Judges lives in danger.

Of course we'd still need the senate to find them guilty and kick them out, but that ain't my fault either - I voted for Alan Keyes (thanks IL GOP, ya boneheaded criminals).

btw, When the heck is Tom Delay going to trial for all his (cough) crimes? Sometime this decade I presume.

19 posted on 07/01/2008 7:58:37 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984; BillF
The sad part is that Kennedy has dramatically increased his leftward drift the last 4-5 years or so.

Kennedy is a huge admirer of O'Connor. When she left, he all but promised to replace her.

What actually happened on Scotus is O'Connor resigned, Kennedy replaced her and Roberts replaced Kennedy leaving the place status quo. In a way, O'Connor never left.

20 posted on 07/01/2008 8:27:56 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson