Here you go:
Posted on 06/28/2008 4:25:45 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
Here is hard, irrefutable proof that the Obama campaign is engaged in a huge deceit related to what they are claiming is a copy of his birth certificate.
Notice on Obama's official site, his birth certificate says OHBM 1.1 in the lower left corner.
The original document displayed on the Daily KOS website says OHSM 1.1 in the lower left corner.
The million dollar question is: If the Daily KOS document was supplied by a Obama campaign staffer, as was reported, then how on earth can these two documents differ?
There may be a Hawaiian state agency or department with the initials 'OHBM', but I'm not aware of any.
The agency that you request a copy of a birth certificate from is the 'Office of Health Status Monitoring', OHSM.
The genie is out of the bottle now and it's impossible to "take back" the images. They are immortalized all over the web on different sites. Anyone can see this hard proof of skullduggery for themselves.
Note: Those who keep saying this is a distraction are missing a huge point here. It directly takes aim at Obama and his credibility. A bald-faced lie has been perpetrated on the American public. As far as this issue relates to Obama being a natural born citizen, I make no claims. But there sure has to be some reason for the deceit. Who knows where the trail will lead…
Here you go:
LOL! She still has some work to do!
This also means that according to the Muslim "faith", both candidate Obama and President Obama face the possibility of mandated assassination by any one of millions of the faithful across the fruited plain and the entire earth itself.....wherever he may roam.
If he doesn't deliver what his Muslim supporters demand (like yanking the troops out of Iraq) he better seriously beware.
ROP = RIP.
Leni
I’m hoping that this was posted as a joke and the punchline has something to do with a the birth certificate having a BM on it. :-)
1) on the animated GIF at the first link in post 13, I'd swear that I can see a faint round impression to the left of the one on the DeCosta certificate. It's most noticable in the in-between state between the two GIFs.
2) With that in mind, look at the extreme blow up on this post, especially in the area to the right of the Father's Name and above the reverse date stamp. Do you see horizontal lines along the vertical background pattern in the area where the faint embossment appears in the animation? Do those lines appear to form a circular pattern going up and to the left?
Is it just me? Have I been staring at these for two long or is there really something there?
-PJ
Thanks for pointing that out. When I looked at the “B” and compared with the “S” in Laser they do look slightly different though. It’s very hard to tell.
If all this is true and Obama is proven to be an illegal Kenyan in the US, will he be allowed to remain tne senator from IL, or will he be put on a plane to Nairobi?
Jambo Hussein.
see post 49 - I see the same thing as you
I don’t see it though I tried hard to find what you’re seeing.
See 17. FWIW.
If you open the image file from Kos in a text editor, the first line appears to show that the file was created or saved by Adobe CS3 Photoshop on a Mac on 6/12/08 at 08:42:36 hrs.
The DailyKos Diary on which it appears was first posted 2 minutes later on 6/12/08 at 8:44:37."
Buckhead is right. I might also mention that, beginning with the 24th byte in a JPG file, one can embed information hidden from view...except, of course in a text editor, or better still, a hex editor.
For example, I have a JPG of an old map. Looking inside the file, I found the author or copyright owner of the image, "Lead Technologies, Inc."
Yes, I did open the image in a hex editor, and I did see the information regarding Adobe Photoshop CS3, Mac OS 2.0, and the date stamp of the photo, all beginning at byte#144.
I also took a look inside the JPG posted on Obama's "Smears" website. Beginning with byte #24, I see the word, "Ducky," who I assume is the author of this altered file. And, yes, I see, the word, "Adobe," beginning at byte#43, but I do not see what identifies which version of Photoshop was used.
HOWEVER...
Looking earlier inside the Kos image, beginning with byte #24, You can see the word, "Exif," the Exif image format supported by almost all digital cameras!
What typically follows, "Exif," is the information about the shutter speed, flash condition, focal length, and other image information included in the photo image.
WTF? The Daily Kos image was pulled from a digital camera file, modified in Photoshop CS3 running under Mac OS 2.0, and subsequently saved on June 12, 2008 at 8:42am!
Stay tuned. I'm going to analyze thse with my EXIF Reader.
-PJ
I agree, they both look like “S”s to me.
-PJ
I was hoping that this entire thread was posted as a joke, but it's now apparent we've got a whole lotta Buckhead wannabes here.
Beyond stupid, this subject to focus on....makes Free Republic look like a band of total idiots.
See post 49...
Wait for all the pictures to load.
Study the green hatch marks above and slightly to the above right of the Jun 6 2007 date
You will see some of the green hatch marks have tiny little horizontal black marks (ripples) in them. You can see a curve of a circle by looking at the pattern of these black marks in the the green hatches. (pull you face away from the screen on your monitor)
You may need to save the image on your computer and zoom in on the area to see them better, but they are there and do form a partial circle. It looks like a very light embossed pattern of a seal.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.