Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brady Campaign statement on Heller decision [choose your level of Barf]
Brady Campaign ^ | 6/26/08 | Paul Helmke

Posted on 06/26/2008 8:50:30 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe

Statement Of Brady President Paul Helmke On Supreme Court Second Amendment Ruling

Washington, D.C. - Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Center and Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, issued the following statement:

“Our fight to enact sensible gun laws will be undiminished by the Supreme Court’s decision in the Heller case. While we disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling, which strips the citizens of the District of Columbia of a law they strongly support, the decision clearly suggests that other gun laws are entirely consistent with the Constitution.

“For years, the gun lobby has used fear of government gun confiscation to thwart efforts to pass sensible gun laws, arguing that even modest gun laws will lead down the path to a complete ban on gun ownership. Now that the Court has struck down the District’s ban on handguns, while making it clear that the Constitution allows for reasonable restrictions on access to dangerous weapons, this ‘slippery slope’ argument is gone.

“The Court also rejected the absolutist misreading of the Second Amendment that some use to argue ‘any gun, any time for anyone,’ which many politicians have used as an excuse to do nothing about the scourge of gun violence in our country and to block passage of common sense gun laws. Lifesaving proposals such as requiring Brady background checks on all gun sales, limiting bulk sales of handguns, and strengthening the power of federal authorities to shut down corrupt gun dealers can now be debated on their merits without distractions of fear or ideology.

“The Heller decision, however, will most likely embolden criminal defendants, and ideological extremists, to file new legal attacks on existing gun laws. With the help of the Brady Center’s legal team, those attacks can, and must, be successfully resisted in the interest of public safety.

“After the Heller ruling, as before, approximately 80 Americans will continue to die from guns every day. Our weak or non-existent gun laws contribute to the thousands of senseless gun deaths and injuries in this country that occur each year. We must continue to fight for sensible gun laws to help protect our families and our communities.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; bradycampaign; bradycenter; bradywatch; guncontrol; heller; paulhelmke; rkba; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Posting this as a reminder to us all: the Heller ruling is positive, but it is only a starting point -- there is a lot of work still to be done. And the opponents of freedom are already figuring out how they can shift tactics to accomplish their diabolical goals.

Μολών λαβέ

1 posted on 06/26/2008 8:50:31 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
Enemy action ping.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

2 posted on 06/26/2008 8:53:11 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
...and ideological extremists...

I guess they mean people who believe in the constitution.

3 posted on 06/26/2008 8:53:12 AM PDT by realdifferent1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
One Liberal Judge away from erasing our 2nd Amendment Right to Keep & Bear Arms!

Maybe I won't have to hold my hose so tight when I vote MeCain by voting staight party ticket.

4 posted on 06/26/2008 8:54:29 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
The gun control groups are disappointed but they're not going to allow Heller to get in the way of their taking away our constitutional rights. The same liberals who demand abortions without legal limits insist guns must be tightly regulated by the government, no ifs ands or buts. What incredible hypocrisy!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 06/26/2008 8:55:50 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realdifferent1
"The Heller decision, however, will most likely embolden constitutionalists to file new legal attacks on existing gun laws. We can only hope.
6 posted on 06/26/2008 8:57:40 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

“approximately 80 Americans will continue to die from guns every day”

Stupid. How many die everyday from automobile accidents, DWI wrecks, heart failure from one too many cheeseburgers, lung cancer from smoking... These people are too stupid.


7 posted on 06/26/2008 8:58:06 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I have a question for the Brady Bunch.

How does it feel to have your arses handed to you like it was today?


8 posted on 06/26/2008 9:00:19 AM PDT by djf (I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
While we disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling, which strips the citizens of the District of Columbia of a law they strongly support restores the right of the people to keep and bear arms...
9 posted on 06/26/2008 9:00:27 AM PDT by HoosierHawk (Hypocrisy does not apply to liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I hope they panic when we get through with their attempts to run our lives.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

10 posted on 06/26/2008 9:01:02 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
which strips the citizens of the District of Columbia of a law they strongly support

How do they back up this statement?

11 posted on 06/26/2008 9:02:34 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoosierHawk
The people of DC were never asked if they wanted to be forcibly disarmed. No - the city government made that decision for them. Talk about your liberal high handed paternalism. To which the Brady Bunch naturally cottons.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

12 posted on 06/26/2008 9:02:54 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: djf
5-4 is a squeaker.
13 posted on 06/26/2008 9:03:20 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Stupid. How many die everyday from automobile accidents, DWI wrecks, heart failure from one too many cheeseburgers, lung cancer from smoking

... These people are too stupid.

Just like the 2A, the first part is a preamble, while the second part is the operative statement.

14 posted on 06/26/2008 9:03:34 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I fear that this not-very-useful idiot is right in a sense: I think this ruling might clarify the situation enough to embolden municipalities to think they can can craft new laws which would withstand a challenge. OTOH, public sentiment seems to have come out pretty strongly on the right[s] side on this one, so maybe the net effect on their thinking will be positive.


15 posted on 06/26/2008 9:03:43 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

All this is, is an “Open For Business” statement by the Brady Bunch. Their fear-mongering brings them big bucks I’m sure.


16 posted on 06/26/2008 9:04:17 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Barack Hussein Obama=Jimmy Carter II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The Heller decision, however, will most likely embolden ...ideological extremists, to file new legal attacks on existing gun laws.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAA. Seems to be calling 5 Supreme Court Justices "ideological extremists", hehehehehe.And the anti-gun fools will still donate their money to this vacuous movement! FOOLS!

Diane Feinstein said she was "viscerally affected by this decision".

I am viscerally affected by Diane Feinstein!

17 posted on 06/26/2008 9:04:25 AM PDT by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
ROFL! So I support the government's taking away my right to defend myself. I can just imagine the liberal reaction if we say people support personhood for the unborn. Watch them go ballistic!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

18 posted on 06/26/2008 9:04:39 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
How revealing that the only mention of "criminals" in this ridiculous press release is the fear that criminals will use the Supreme Court ruling to files new challenges to gun laws.

What planet do these people live on? It is certainly not the one where the rest of us live - the one on which criminals could not care less about gun laws. Why? Because they're criminals, you idiots!

But to the Brady Bunch, criminals are not responsible for crime. No, no, no: "...approximately 80 Americans will continue to die from guns every day." The guns that shoot themselves, I think they meant to say.

Seriously: is it possible to ridicule these people enough? I don't know the answer to that question, but I am willing to try.

19 posted on 06/26/2008 9:04:46 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Peace is Not The Question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

It’s enough to drive a stake through the heart of the “collective rights” interpretation.

As of today, that one has been put to bed - forever.


20 posted on 06/26/2008 9:06:40 AM PDT by djf (I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson