You should credit our Hawaiian Freeper who gave hers up unredacted.
There's an extraordinary amount of freeper teamwork going on here. But then, that's Freeperdom!
Leni
Well, I did credit DeCosta for providing a copy against which I obtained more evidence for my analyses..see my post, “Now, let’s compare apples to apples.”
BUT, keep in mind that well before her certificate was posted. I demonstrated fairly succintly that the text on the Obama image had been graphically altered, and to my knowledge none before me had done an analysis on the graphical anomalies of the Obama certificate.
The anomalies regarding the information itself are another issue entirely, since even if the Obama certificate had exactly the same into as the original, and even if it had the reversed seal and signature block, the question remains as to why did someone modify the original text and borders with a graphics program.
Certainly NOT to enhance the text!
The ONLY reason that comes to mind is one of hiding the truth — that some bit of information on the original would be damaging if released to the public.
Scanned images are supposed to be WYSIWYG, but someone deliberately changed the “What you get” part for somethiong more than just on a whim.