Skip to comments.
Meet the women who won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly
Daily Mail ^
| 21 November 2007
| NATASHA COURTENAY-SMITH and MORAG TURNER
Posted on 06/23/2008 11:59:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Had Toni Vernelli gone ahead with her pregnancy ten years ago, she would know at first hand what it is like to cradle her own baby, to have a pair of innocent eyes gazing up at her with unconditional love, to feel a little hand slipping into hers - and a voice calling her Mummy.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: darwinaward; environment; envirowhackos; extinction; loonyleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: 2banana
...only if they were chipper shredded and buried beneath a tree in a park !!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It never fails to amaze me just how shallow and self-absorbed some human beings can be.
62
posted on
06/23/2008 1:25:32 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(This tagline is completely naked - STOP STARING!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thought child sacrifice ended with the worship of baal. Guess not.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Skanks.
Must be a shortage of ten-foot poles.
64
posted on
06/23/2008 1:32:54 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."
The end result of this argument, of course, is that no more people should be born and humanity should willingly go extinct. As technology grows ever more powerful and the ability of small groups to wreak devastation increases, I expect some environmental extremists to stop worrying about the "willingly" part. Environmental terrorism aimed at exterminating large numbers of human beings is going to be a fact of life in the 21st century.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
66
posted on
06/23/2008 1:40:31 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The bizarre Global Warmism Cult version of the sterile, intentionally infertile Shaker Sect from 200 years prior. And just as equally doomed to extinction. History of course repeats itself.
67
posted on
06/23/2008 1:41:44 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: Xenalyte
Out of our 9 children, I can’t recall any of them throwing poop though I do remember our oldest trying to change her own diaper once. She smeared poop on quite a bit of stuff. We were not happy in the least. But throwing poo??? Nah. :) Maybe I shouldn’t speak too soon. Our youngest likes to throw just about everything . . . and he gets nothing but encouragement from our oldest boys.
To: 2banana
beat me to it. Mayhaps she could fertilize some trees.
69
posted on
06/23/2008 1:47:55 PM PDT
by
Operation_Shock_N_Awe
(I'd rather be a conservative nut job than a liberal with no nuts and no job)
To: FormerACLUmember
Like the Global Warming Cult, The Shakers also believed in communal property and that the world would end in their lifetime.
Cults change names, but there is nothing new in what they preach. It's all been done before.
70
posted on
06/23/2008 2:02:02 PM PDT
by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
To: girlangler
This is what some of these organizations are about, removing humans (except themselves or theyd commit suicide for the environment)from the earth. We never hear about them killing themselves so as to eliminate their own carbon footprint. I guess that's because they're so darn special and important, and we need them to stick around and instruct us all on how to live.
71
posted on
06/23/2008 2:12:40 PM PDT
by
Dianna
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sometimes extinction is a good thing.
72
posted on
06/23/2008 3:33:18 PM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hmmmmm, .......... First time I’ve heard of a self-pruning family-tree. Dead branches I’ve seen, but self-pruning?
73
posted on
06/24/2008 8:50:41 AM PDT
by
fella
("...He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson