Meet the women who won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly

Daily Mail ^ | 21 November 2007 | NATASHA COURTENAY-SMITH and MORAG TURNER

[MD_Willington_1976]

...only if they were chipper shredded and buried beneath a tree in a park !!

[reagan_fanatic]

It never fails to amaze me just how shallow and self-absorbed some human beings can be.

[Walkingfeather]

Thought child sacrifice ended with the worship of baal. Guess not.

[Bon mots]

Skanks.
Must be a shortage of ten-foot poles.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

The end result of this argument, of course, is that no more people should be born and humanity should willingly go extinct. As technology grows ever more powerful and the ability of small groups to wreak devastation increases, I expect some environmental extremists to stop worrying about the "willingly" part. Environmental terrorism aimed at exterminating large numbers of human beings is going to be a fact of life in the 21st century.

[Bigg Red]

21 November 2007????

[FormerACLUmember]

The bizarre Global Warmism Cult version of the sterile, intentionally infertile Shaker Sect from 200 years prior. And just as equally doomed to extinction. History of course repeats itself.

[petitfour]

Out of our 9 children, I can’t recall any of them throwing poop though I do remember our oldest trying to change her own diaper once. She smeared poop on quite a bit of stuff. We were not happy in the least. But throwing poo??? Nah. :) Maybe I shouldn’t speak too soon. Our youngest likes to throw just about everything . . . and he gets nothing but encouragement from our oldest boys.

[Operation_Shock_N_Awe]

beat me to it. Mayhaps she could fertilize some trees.

[Ditto]

Like the Global Warming Cult, The Shakers also believed in communal property and that the world would end in their lifetime.

Cults change names, but there is nothing new in what they preach. It's all been done before.

[Dianna]

This is what some of these organizations are about, removing humans (except themselves or they’d commit suicide for the environment)from the earth.

We never hear about them killing themselves so as to eliminate their own carbon footprint. I guess that's because they're so darn special and important, and we need them to stick around and instruct us all on how to live.

[TexasRepublic]

Sometimes extinction is a good thing.

[fella]

Hmmmmm, .......... First time I’ve heard of a self-pruning family-tree. Dead branches I’ve seen, but self-pruning?