Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group seeks probe of CA congresswoman (California Rep. Laura Richardson)
A Professional News Organization Zone (APNOze) News Digest ^ | June 18, 2008 | News Writer

Posted on 06/18/2008 11:59:52 PM PDT by CutePuppy

I have read 2 "stories" from "A Professional News Organization Zone" and combined the "news" contained in them ("news" is "news" and, unlike "music" or "lyrics", cannot be "owned" by any "news" organization, even really big one like APNOze) without explicitly quoting the "stories". If there are things in this news account that APNOze thinks are different from their version of the news, they are welcome to provide correction to this story or their own account of same news.

Here's a basic digest of what happened:

A Washington watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics requested House Ethics Committee to investigate history of real estate loans defaults by California Representative Laura Richardson (D-CA).

James York, an investor who purchased her foreclosed house in May of 2008 for $388,000 at an auction held by Washington Mutual (WaMu) bank that provided the mortgage loan that Richardson defaulted on by failing to make timely payments, now claims that congresswoman used her influence as legislator to have WaMu and subsidiary to renege on the sale.

So York filed a lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court, seeking return of the house along with punitive damages. "They rescinded the notice of trustee sale and put it back in her name before even telling me. "It's not a difficult case. It's a valid sale," he said.

Laura Richardson purchased the house for something like $535,000 in January of 2007.

Richardson spokesman, William Marshall, declined comment. WaMu spokeswoman could not comment due to lack of authorization from Richardson.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: apmedia; apnews; apscam; california; congress; fightap; howtofight; howtofightap; laurarichardson; mediastupidity; wamu
You can find more details, if you care or very similar "news" on news.google.com or news.yahoo.com, http://www.breitbart.com/index.php?state=3|2|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0#0 or other such sources.

I appreciate your comments on the news. It's unfortunate that some APNOze affiliates (especially numerous small, struggling ones) will lose whatever click-based advertisement they might have had from links to these two stories.

1 posted on 06/18/2008 11:59:52 PM PDT by CutePuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
"WaMu spokeswoman could not comment due to lack of authorization from Richardson."

Send inquiries to Sen. Chrissy Dodd. He is VIP at WaMu.

yitbos

2 posted on 06/19/2008 12:22:06 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

These “deals” between WaMu and “selected” VIP Congress Critters -— displaying a criminal level of banking practices, was enough to finally convince me to withdraw all funds from WaMu....


3 posted on 06/19/2008 12:41:26 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat; bruinbirdman

You might mean Countrywide, which had Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad as their VIPs?

Quite interesting that, while Dems have been fiercely protecting and sponsoring Fannie Mae (of Raines, Gorelick and Johnson infamy, to name just a few) and Freddie Mac - just look at $300B bill now in Congress for their and mortgages “bailout”, they were pretty harsh over the years to both WaMu and Countrywide (and its CEO Angelo Mozilo) which led me to assume that they were Republican “shops” (I never cared to check their political donations) unlike, for instance, Citigroup or Goldman Sachs which were mostly Democrat donors.

So, at first, it was a little surprising to me when these stories recently broke about this entirely new Dems’ “culture of corruption”, starting with Johnson in the Obama campaign, involving WaMu and essentially bankrupt / insolvent Countrywide (bailed out by BoA with the blessings from Fed and Congress). It doesn’t surprise me now.


4 posted on 06/19/2008 1:01:12 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
"James York, an investor who purchased her foreclosed house in May of 2008 for $388,000 at an auction held by Washington Mutual (WaMu) bank that provided the mortgage loan that Richardson defaulted on by failing to make timely payments, now claims that congresswoman used her influence as legislator to have WaMu and subsidiary to renege on the sale.

Nope, I meant WaMu...... First for granting a loan to this Congress Critter whose credit rating must have been smaller that her shoe size - and THEN reneging on their foreclosure sale....

5 posted on 06/19/2008 1:06:42 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
"You might mean Countrywide"

Countrywide, WaMu, Century 21. Chairman of Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs is a VIP at all of them.

But, yes, I was thinking of Countrywide (8>)

yitbos

6 posted on 06/19/2008 1:40:05 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Why can’t democrats admit they are thieves and be done wioth it?


7 posted on 06/19/2008 2:22:52 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Wow! I never knew CREW went after Democrats.


8 posted on 06/19/2008 8:22:07 AM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
They already have - that's how they justify that rules and laws for "little people" as well as "the rich" don't apply to them. They are "the other white meat".
9 posted on 06/19/2008 11:18:52 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Just like ACLU, they may occasionally feel the need to "absolve" themselves from well-deserved reputation of partisanship for future bona fides on these matters.

Besides, she is getting to be an unmitigated embarrassment so they might want to have that out of the way as the prime "culture of corruption" symbol to hide "minor" infractions like Dodd and Conrad and other VIPs.

10 posted on 06/19/2008 11:26:54 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson