Posted on 06/17/2008 1:23:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
This is our Boston tea Party.
The Associated Press wants to levy a $12.50 and up license fee (aka extortion fee) on any blogger who quotes more than 4 words from one of their propaganda pieces. This is an outrageous attempt to control the blogosphere and free speech itself. To hell with their license fee and to hell with the AP. Any AP article that gets posted to FR will be jettisoned into the harbor posthaste.
Please do not post any AP material to FR excerpted or not.
If AP quotes a source directly, those direct quotes should be used for free.
So, the obvious and very simple answer is to post AP articles using DU or Daily Kos as the source reference. That would be a fun lawsuit. ;)
Then set up your contracts that way. If you don't, then don't complain. Or are you saying that the government should prevent you from having the right to set up your contract that way?
Meanwhile, the Associated Press has set up their licensing how they want...and it's FR's right not to comply. But it's not right to steal their product against their license.
If I recite an AP article out loud in a public square how is that different than posting the same here?
I hope that's true.The fact they ask us to pay for four words and have your "license" revoked if you say anything they don't like, is the problem.
Now, that is correct.
(IANAL, so I can only offer my layman's understanding....)
Of course, reciting it aloud has been found to be illegal...and so has posting it here...but whether they are legally identical or not, I don't know.
When there's a fee, yes.
Those of us who wish to refute it.
It's too bad FRhas been forced to surrender.
10-4
Maybe they got tired of having their own words used against them. :)
When a newspaper gets the story from AP feed, they are not "buying the story"...they are licensing the use of the story under specific terms. That doesn't mean the ownership transfers or that they can do anything they want with it.
“Patrol every site,”
Nope, just sites they want to shut down.
LATimes allows DU to excerpt or post full articles, but not FR.
Look back in time and see what Stalin did. These are Stalinist tactics.
AP to Bloggers: We’re Not Trying To Sue You
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2032640/posts?page=1
The “4 words” concept is a little ignorant on their part:
“President Bush meets with Pope.”
How many different ways can you say that?
That said, it looks like AP is backing off a little.
“The AP won’t be able to enforce this. “
No, they’ll focus on one site at a time, with Kos and DU last, and FR and LGF first.
maybe with a few small outfits to be the very first, to work out the procedures and processes and get the courts in line.
Another thought...
If AP material isn’t allowed (and there’s lots of it), then you’ll probably have to make bloggers’ material a bit more acceptable on the main forum.
Please delete it.
I read much, but post little. How about get an estimate of what a legal challenge may cost and set up a fund for it. Get enough in the fund and quote “them” from here and back. I’ll give 50 bucks if I see a link on the frontpage.
AP is a newswire that all of the papers pick up stories from — there is no AP newspaper(s). You will find AP articles in almost every newspaper in the Country that is of any size as they use AP to fill their newspaper in additional to their local reporters.
This is just a throwdown on the run-up to the big Thursday meeting.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25200396/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.