Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick J. Buchanan's Know-Nothing History
NY Sun ^ | June 11, 2008 | ADAM KIRSCH

Posted on 06/13/2008 10:06:48 AM PDT by forkinsocket

Patrick J. Buchanan's new contribution to the flourishing genre of World War II revisionism, should appear in the same season as Nicholson Baker's "Human Smoke." Never has there been such a clear demonstration of the way ideological extremes tend to converge.

Messrs. Baker and Buchanan probably could not stand to be in the same room for five minutes. The former is to the left of most Democrats, the latter to the right of most Republicans. When they look back to the 1930s, Mr. Baker's role models are the Quakers and pacifists who believed it was better to lie down for Hitler than take up arms to fight him; Mr. Buchanan's are the isolationists who believed that Nazi Germany was a necessary bulwark against the real menace, godless communism. But the net result of their lucubrations is the same. Both men have written books arguing that World War II, far from being "the good war" of myth, was an unnecessary folly that Britain and America should never have engaged in. And both have zeroed in on Winston Churchill as the war's true villain — an immoral, hypocritical, bloodthirsty braggart whose fame is a hoax on posterity.

But where Mr. Baker's book can be, and in most quarters has been, dismissed as the ignorant blundering of a novelist who wandered far out of his depth, Mr. Buchanan's book is more dangerous. For Mr. Buchanan, a former speechwriter in the Nixon and Reagan White Houses, was once a notable presence in mainstream American politics.

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: adamkirsch; bookreview; buchanan; coughlinjunior; dayofreckoning; franzliebkind; humansmoke; mullahpat; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorksun; nicholsonbaker; pages; patbuchanan; patrickbuchanan; patrickjbuchanan; pitchforkpat; stateofemergency; thedeathofthewest; theunnecessarywar; unitedkingdom; winstonchurchill; worldwareleven; worldwartwo; wwii
.
1 posted on 06/13/2008 10:06:48 AM PDT by forkinsocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Reminds me of LaRouche. All that education and he comes up sucking his thumb.


2 posted on 06/13/2008 10:11:58 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Teach your child to be an American. Take him out of public school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

PB wrote an article a decade ago for Chronicles magazine about the Civil War which was full of errors (more than 50 in about eight pages). He’s not a serious historian.


3 posted on 06/13/2008 10:14:00 AM PDT by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Reminds me of LaRouche. All that education and he comes up sucking his thumb.
lol...
Smart but not wise?
4 posted on 06/13/2008 10:15:03 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Pat has turned into one of those Paleocons who blames jews for all of the US’s foreign policy problems.


5 posted on 06/13/2008 10:18:30 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Mr. Buchanan, a former speechwriter in the Nixon and Reagan White Houses, was once a notable presence in mainstream American politics.

PB had only the briefest period in the mainstream, when he was co-host of CNN's then top rated Crossfire. Success destroyed him, however.

6 posted on 06/13/2008 10:22:33 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

All of history is writ to fit the times; when the times change, it is rewritten.


7 posted on 06/13/2008 10:22:34 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Reminds me of Franz Liebkind.
8 posted on 06/13/2008 10:26:10 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Reads more like a review of Buchanan rather than a review of the book.


9 posted on 06/13/2008 10:26:35 AM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

What an embarrassment. There he goes again; we should have a GOP collection plate for his full and complete retirement - silence.


10 posted on 06/13/2008 10:38:15 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Pat Buchanan jumped the shark a long time ago. His bilious nonsense isn't even credible in the post 9/11 age. The isolationists too were against America's entering the war after Pearl Harbor. I guess one 9/11 isn't enough for Buchanan that America should fight its enemies over there rather than here at home.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 06/13/2008 11:16:56 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

In Buchanan’s book he’s confused Chamberlain for Churchill at least three times. And the premise of his book that Hitler was not out for conquest is pure bullshit. (Guess he never read Mein Kampf. My mother lived it!)
He’s been hanging out too long with Chrissy “oops I peed my pants” Matthews and Herr Olbermeister too long.
Progressive friends will warp your mind.


12 posted on 06/13/2008 11:28:58 AM PDT by griswold3 (Al qaeda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Olbermeister ??? Make thet UNTERmeister???LOL,,,


13 posted on 06/13/2008 11:32:06 AM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Churchill understood that it was better for England to fight against Germany's long-run domination of Western Europe than to fight against the Soviet Union's short-run domination of Eastern and Central Europe.
14 posted on 06/13/2008 12:12:07 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson